【摘要】：本雅明所謂"現(xiàn)代信息社會""以機械復(fù)制為特點"的藝術(shù)是否還需要"創(chuàng)造"?后現(xiàn)代,生活審美化、審美生活化、文學(xué)與生活合一了,文學(xué)"創(chuàng)造"是否成了多余之物?這是人們所關(guān)切的問題。本雅明的所謂"機械復(fù)制",復(fù)制的不是創(chuàng)造本身,而只是創(chuàng)造出來的作品。"現(xiàn)代信息社會"的"機械復(fù)制"并不取消"創(chuàng)造"。至于后現(xiàn)代所謂生活審美化、審美生活化、文學(xué)與生活已經(jīng)合一,因此不需要再特別強調(diào)文學(xué)的"創(chuàng)造性",這也是一個假命題。其實,"文學(xué)與生活并未合一","藝術(shù)是生活的特異化",文學(xué)的"創(chuàng)造"仍然需要。
[Abstract]:Does Benjamin's art of "modern information society" characterized by mechanical reproduction still need to be "created"? Post-modern, aestheticized life, aesthetic life, literature and life in one, literature "creation" has become redundant? This is a matter of concern. Benjamin's so-called "mechanical reproduction" copies not the creation itself, but the created work. The "mechanical reproduction" of the "modern information society" does not cancel the "creation". As for the so-called aestheticization of life, aesthetic life, literature and life have been integrated, so it is no longer necessary to emphasize the "creativity" of literature, which is also a false proposition. In fact, "Literature and life are not in one", "Art is the special alienation of life", the "creation" of literature is still needed.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)院文學(xué)研究所;
【分類號】：I01
，

本文編號：2475206