【摘要】：宗白華是現(xiàn)代著名的美學(xué)大師,關(guān)于他的研究論著已經(jīng)相當(dāng)豐富,尤其是他的意境理論,已經(jīng)達(dá)到一定的高度和深度。但他關(guān)于藝術(shù)境界的思考,卻很少有人關(guān)注,這是因?yàn)樽诎兹A的文章中常常出現(xiàn)兩者混用的情況,而大多數(shù)的學(xué)者在闡述時往往將藝術(shù)境界等同于意境。這在某種程度上造成了對藝術(shù)境界內(nèi)涵的遮蔽,也不利于我們進(jìn)一步深入了解宗白華的美學(xué)思想。所以本文通過對文本的細(xì)讀,試圖對藝術(shù)境界的內(nèi)涵予以梳理和概括,并分析闡釋其獨(dú)特價(jià)值。文章的基本內(nèi)容與思路如下:導(dǎo)論部分首先指出了宗白華文章中常出現(xiàn)境界與意境混用的現(xiàn)象;然后梳理了宗白華藝術(shù)境界觀的研究現(xiàn)狀,并對論文選題的意義和價(jià)值進(jìn)行了分析;最后指出了本文的側(cè)重點(diǎn)與創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第一章:首先對境界的概念進(jìn)行了梳理,在此基礎(chǔ)上對宗白華藝術(shù)境界的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了概括。指出在宗白華看來,藝術(shù)境界是藝術(shù)家以整個的心靈為背景,從情感的體驗(yàn)出發(fā),通過一定的藝術(shù)形式,凝鑄于特定意象中的對于生命、人生、宇宙真理與價(jià)值的體悟和深思。它具有主體論、創(chuàng)作論和價(jià)值論三個層面的內(nèi)涵。第二章:分析論述了宗白華關(guān)于藝術(shù)境界的具體見解,主要從藝術(shù)境界的構(gòu)成、呈現(xiàn)和追求三個方面對其境界觀進(jìn)行闡發(fā)。第一節(jié),“藝術(shù)境界的構(gòu)成”,從創(chuàng)作主體的角度論述藝術(shù)境界的構(gòu)成因素。宗白華認(rèn)為藝術(shù)境界的創(chuàng)造需要藝術(shù)家有一顆赤子之心,同時也要有曠達(dá)的胸襟和非凡的直覺體悟能力。第二節(jié),“藝術(shù)境界的呈現(xiàn)”,從藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作的角度指出藝術(shù)手法對于藝術(shù)境界創(chuàng)造的重要性。宗白華對虛實(shí)相生、觀照法、空間組織法等都有獨(dú)到的見解。第三,“藝術(shù)境界的追求”,從價(jià)值論的角度指出藝術(shù)創(chuàng)造應(yīng)當(dāng)追求境界。宗白華認(rèn)為藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作有寫實(shí)、傳神、妙悟三重境界;禪境是中國藝術(shù)的理想境界,也是最高境界。第三章:分析了宗白華藝術(shù)境界觀的思想淵源。第一節(jié),“中國傳統(tǒng)文化的影響”,分別從《周易》的“生生之德”和“無往不復(fù)”、老莊的“道”和“虛”以及禪宗的“妙悟”三個方面來闡述傳統(tǒng)文化對宗白華的影響。第二節(jié),“西方人文意識的浸潤”,分別從叔本華的同情說以及柏格森的生命創(chuàng)化論兩個方面來論述對宗白華的影響。第四章:是對宗白華藝術(shù)境界觀的評價(jià)。第一節(jié),“宗白華藝術(shù)境界觀的意義”,分別從藝術(shù)主體、創(chuàng)作與批評等方面來肯定其價(jià)值。第二節(jié),“宗白華藝術(shù)境界觀的啟示”,從現(xiàn)實(shí)角度指出藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作需要藝術(shù)家既要涵養(yǎng)心靈與人格,同時也要提升藝術(shù)素質(zhì)。結(jié)語:在充分肯定宗白華藝術(shù)境界觀價(jià)值的同時,也指出其具有一定的局限性,有一定的烏托邦色彩。
[Abstract]:Zong Baihua is a famous aesthetic master in modern times. His research works have been quite abundant, especially his artistic conception theory, which has reached a certain height and depth. However, few people pay attention to his thinking about the artistic realm, which is because Zong Baihua's articles often mix the two, and most scholars often equate artistic realm with artistic conception. To a certain extent, this has resulted in the obscuring of artistic realm connotation, and is not conducive to our further understanding of Zong Baihua's aesthetic thought. So this paper tries to sort out and generalize the connotation of artistic realm by reading the text carefully, and analyze and explain its unique value. The basic contents and ideas of the article are as follows: in the introduction part, the author first points out the phenomenon of the mixed use of realm and artistic conception in Zong Baihua's article, and then combs the current research situation of the artistic realm view of Zong Baihua. The significance and value of this paper are analyzed, and the emphasis and innovation of this paper are pointed out. Chapter one: firstly, the concept of realm is combed, and then the connotation of Zong Baihua's artistic realm is summarized. According to Zong Baihua, the artistic realm is the understanding and reflection of the life, truth and value of the universe, which is based on the whole mind, from the experience of emotion and through a certain artistic form. It has the connotation of subject theory, creation theory and value theory. In the second chapter, the author analyzes Zong Baihua's views on artistic realm, mainly from three aspects: the constitution, presentation and pursuit of artistic realm. The first section, "the composition of artistic realm", discusses the composing factors of artistic realm from the angle of creation subject. Zong Baihua believes that the creation of artistic realm requires the artist to have a naked heart, but also to have a broad-minded mind and an extraordinary ability to intuitively realize. The second section, "the presentation of artistic realm", points out the importance of artistic technique to artistic realm creation from the angle of artistic creation. Zong Baihua has unique views on the existence of void and reality, the law of observation and the law of the organization of space. Third, the pursuit of artistic realm, from the point of view of value, art creation should pursue realm. Zong Baihua believes that artistic creation has realistic, vivid, and wonderful understanding of the triple realm; Zen is the ideal state of Chinese art, but also the highest state. The third chapter analyzes the ideological origin of Zong Baihua's view of artistic realm. The first section, "the influence of Chinese traditional culture", expounds the influence of traditional culture on Zong Baihua from three aspects respectively: "morality of living" and "never going back" in the Book of changes, "Tao" and "deficiency" of Laozhuang and "Miao Wu" of Zen Buddhism. The second section, the infiltration of western humanistic consciousness, discusses the influence on Zong Baihua from Schopenhauer's theory of sympathy and Bergson's theory of life creation. Chapter four: the evaluation of Zong Baihua's artistic realm. The first section, "the significance of Zong Baihua's artistic realm", affirms its value from the aspects of art subject, creation and criticism. The second section, "the enlightenment of Zong Baihua's view of artistic realm", points out that the artistic creation needs the artists not only to cultivate their soul and personality, but also to improve their artistic quality. Conclusion: while fully affirming the value of Zong Baihua's artistic realm, it also points out its limitations and utopia.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：J01

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邵振國;;試論境界說及其質(zhì)性[J];當(dāng)代文壇;2015年01期

2 顧春花;;宗白華關(guān)于文藝形式的研究[J];上饒師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

3 張澤鴻;;“德國經(jīng)驗(yàn)”與“中國問題”——宗白華與現(xiàn)代中國藝術(shù)學(xué)演進(jìn)之考察[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2013年12期

4 李春青;;略論“意境說”的理論歸屬問題——兼談中國文論話語建構(gòu)的可能路徑[J];文學(xué)評論;2013年05期

5 金雅;;“人生藝術(shù)化”:學(xué)術(shù)路徑與理論啟思[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2013年02期

6 胡家祥;;宗白華所講的“藝境”辨識[J];江淮論壇;2009年03期

7 毛宣國;;宗白華的美學(xué):為人生的美學(xué)[J];美與時代(下半月);2009年05期

8 田智祥;;人格境界的追求:宗白華意境理論的核心[J];名作欣賞;2009年10期

9 張澤鴻;吳家榮;;論宗白華的妙悟美學(xué)體系[J];美與時代;2007年07期

10 歐陽文風(fēng);周秋良;;感悟詩學(xué)現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型之可能性及其意義——以王國維、宗白華的詩學(xué)探索為例[J];文學(xué)評論;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 田智祥;宗白華的精神人格與美學(xué)之路[D];山東師范大學(xué);2009年

2 王進(jìn)進(jìn);宗白華美學(xué)思想述評[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 郝赫;宗白華藝術(shù)形式美學(xué)思想研究[D];浙江理工大學(xué);2015年

2 賀肖鵬;宗白華中國畫理論研究[D];河北大學(xué);2014年

3 孫雪峰;天人合一：宗白華美學(xué)的詩意追求[D];牡丹江師范學(xué)院;2014年

4 韓君君;宗白華美學(xué)中的“生命觀”研究[D];山西師范大學(xué);2013年

5 智小平;宗白華美學(xué)思想的生命觀[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2010年

6 張美萍;宗白華“空靈”美學(xué)思想論[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

7 馬慧娜;宗白華美學(xué)的人格理想[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2007年

8 張愛武;宗白華生命美學(xué)研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：2273099