本文選題：意識形態(tài)文論　切入點：文學審美意識形態(tài)　出處：《理論導刊》2017年11期

【摘要】：國內目前的意識形態(tài)文論建設存在這樣幾個問題:一是對經典作家的經典文本的詮釋還有待深入;二是對國外意識形態(tài)及文論思想的借鑒、批判存在不足;三是受西方學術觀念轉變影響,中國學界已開始把意識形態(tài)問題轉化為一個美學問題,但到目前為止,學界始終未能提出合理有效闡釋文學現象的意識形態(tài)批評模式。就第一個問題看,馬克思定性文學使用的概念是"意識形態(tài)的形式",直接使用"意識形態(tài)"定性文學的人是恩格斯,這一點應明確。就第二個問題看,意識形態(tài)文論建設雖然取得了實績,但還有深入研究的可能和必要。就第三個問題,應該認識到,形式是組織材料并賦予材料以意義的一種結構性功能或力量。從而,文學研究的基本思路應從特殊到一般,即從審美、形式到政治、意識形態(tài),而不是相反�？紤]到文學批評從根本上是一個實踐問題,這里只能提出一個大致的構想和框架,即作家創(chuàng)作過程中存在意識形態(tài)沖突、文本中及文本間存在意識形態(tài)沖突、文學接受過程中存在意識形態(tài)沖突。
[Abstract]:There are several problems in the construction of ideological literary theory in China: first, the interpretation of classical texts of classical writers remains to be deepened;Third, influenced by the change of western academic concepts, the Chinese academic circles have begun to turn the ideological problem into an aesthetic problem, but so far, the academic circles have not been able to put forward a rational and effective interpretation of literary phenomenon of ideological criticism model.As far as the first problem is concerned, the concept of Marx's use of qualitative literature is "the form of ideology", and the person who directly uses "ideology" to characterize literature is Engels, which should be made clear.From the second point of view, although the construction of ideological literary theory has made achievements, it is possible and necessary to further study it.With regard to the third question, it should be recognized that the form is a structural function or force that organizes and gives meaning to material.Thus, the basic thinking of literary research should be from special to general, from aesthetics, form to politics, ideology, and not vice versa.Considering that literary criticism is fundamentally a practical problem, we can only put forward a general conception and framework, that is, there are ideological conflicts in the process of writers' creation, and ideological conflicts in and between texts.There are ideological conflicts in the process of literary acceptance.
【作者單位】： 蘭州城市學院文史學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重點項目“新時期文藝理論建設與文藝批評研究”(12AZD012)
【分類號】：I0
，

本文編號：1718579