發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-12 21:24

  本文選題：狂歡化　切入點(diǎn)：巴赫金　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本論文以巴赫金提出的狂歡化理論為核心,試圖探尋狂歡化理論產(chǎn)生的歷史淵源,闡明狂歡化理論的基本特征和意義,考察狂歡化理論在當(dāng)代西方的發(fā)展以及在中國(guó)的接受情況。本論文的正文部分共分為四章: 第一章“狂歡化溯源”,對(duì)巴赫金提出的狂歡化理論進(jìn)行了理論溯源�！癱arnivalesque”(狂歡化)一詞來(lái)源于“carnival”(狂歡節(jié))�！癱arnival”一詞是在基督教誕生之后出現(xiàn)的,但狂歡節(jié)作為一種文化現(xiàn)象,早在古希臘羅馬時(shí)期就存在�？駳g化理論在西方具有深厚的理論基礎(chǔ),從古希臘羅馬,中世紀(jì),文藝復(fù)興及浪漫主義時(shí)期直到19世紀(jì),不同時(shí)期的人們都關(guān)注這種文化現(xiàn)象,并逐漸形成狂歡理論的全民性、顛覆性、烏托邦理想等基本特征。 第二章“巴赫金的狂歡化理論”,著重探討了巴赫金的狂歡化理論的基本內(nèi)涵、特征和意義。巴赫金不僅揭示狂歡化蘊(yùn)含的文化意義,而且還將狂歡化作為一個(gè)文學(xué)批評(píng)術(shù)語(yǔ)提出來(lái),將它作為小說(shuō)文體的一種重要特征,并用它來(lái)分析具體的小說(shuō)文本。巴赫金認(rèn)為狂歡節(jié)的各種儀式和世界感受在文學(xué)作品中的體現(xiàn)即為“狂歡化”。 第三章“狂歡化理論在西方的發(fā)展”,在巴赫金之后,當(dāng)代西方學(xué)者對(duì)狂歡化理論的運(yùn)用和發(fā)展,主要表現(xiàn)在兩個(gè)方面:一方面是將“狂歡”作為小說(shuō)文本的一種特征繼續(xù)加以研究,以米蘭·昆德拉為代表;另一方面是將其作為后現(xiàn)代文化重要特征之一加以研究,約翰·菲斯克為代表。后來(lái)學(xué)者對(duì)狂歡化理論繼承的同時(shí),由于歷史時(shí)代環(huán)境的變化,他們各自理論中也都呈現(xiàn)出一些新的特點(diǎn),如民間文化的詼諧轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楹蟋F(xiàn)代的幽默,全民的狂歡變?yōu)閭�(gè)人的狂歡,廣場(chǎng)節(jié)慶的狂歡變?yōu)槿粘Ｉ畹目駳g。這些新特點(diǎn)也可以說(shuō)是狂歡化理論在新時(shí)期發(fā)展的結(jié)果。 第四章“狂歡化理論在中國(guó)的接受”,主要考察狂歡化理論在中國(guó)的接受和變異的情況。本章首先介紹了狂歡的相關(guān)理論在中國(guó)的譯介,并力圖指出中國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)這一理論接受和理解過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題。其次,狂歡化理論在中國(guó)批評(píng)領(lǐng)域的運(yùn)用主要表現(xiàn)在兩個(gè)方面,一方面是運(yùn)用狂歡化理論分析具體文學(xué)文本,另一方面是分析中國(guó)當(dāng)下的文化現(xiàn)象�？駳g化理論在中國(guó)的運(yùn)用存在著理論與文學(xué)和文化脫節(jié)的情況。由于對(duì)狂歡化理論的理解不夠透徹,加上中國(guó)文學(xué)文化的獨(dú)特性,在運(yùn)用中多少存在著一些牽強(qiáng)附會(huì)。
[Abstract]:Based on Bakhtin's carnival theory, this paper attempts to explore the historical origin of carnival theory and clarify the basic characteristics and significance of carnival theory. The main body of this thesis is divided into four chapters:. The first chapter, "Carnival tracing to the Source", traces the theoretical origin of Bakhtin's carnival theory. The word "carnivalesque" comes from "carnival" (Carnival). "carnival" appears after the birth of Christianity, but Carnival is a cultural phenomenon. The carnival theory has a deep theoretical foundation in the West, from ancient Greece to Rome, the Middle Ages, Renaissance and Romanticism until 19th century, people in different periods pay attention to this kind of cultural phenomenon. And gradually formed the carnival theory of the whole people, subversive, utopian ideals and other basic characteristics. The second chapter, "Bakhtin's Carnival Theory", focuses on the basic connotation, characteristics and significance of Bakhtin's carnival theory. In addition, the carnival was put forward as a literary criticism term, and it was regarded as an important feature of the style of the novel. Bakhtin thinks that all kinds of ceremonies and world feelings of carnival are "carnival" in literary works. Chapter three, "the Development of Carnival Theory in the West", after Bakhtin, the contemporary western scholars apply and develop the carnival theory. There are two main aspects: on the one hand, we continue to study Carnival as a feature of the novel text, represented by Milan Kundera, and on the other hand, we study it as one of the important features of postmodern culture. John Fiske is the representative. Later, when scholars inherited the carnival theory, due to the changes in the historical environment, their respective theories also showed some new characteristics, such as the humor of folk culture turned into post-modern humor. The carnival of the whole people becomes the individual carnival, the carnival of the square festival becomes the carnival of daily life, these new characteristics can also be said to be the result of the development of the carnival theory in the new period. Chapter 4th, "reception of Carnival Theory in China", mainly examines the reception and variation of carnival theory in China. This chapter first introduces the translation and introduction of carnival theory in China. Secondly, the application of carnival theory in the field of Chinese criticism is mainly manifested in two aspects, on the one hand, the use of carnival theory to analyze specific literary texts. On the other hand, it analyzes the current cultural phenomena in China. There is a disconnection between theory and literature and culture in the application of carnival theory in China. Due to the lack of thorough understanding of carnival theory and the uniqueness of Chinese literature and culture, There are some far-fetched meetings in use.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 ;“文學(xué)理論新概念新術(shù)語(yǔ)”辭條選登(五)[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);1988年04期

2 張素玫;對(duì)話與狂歡:巴赫金與中國(guó)當(dāng)代文學(xué)批評(píng)[J];當(dāng)代文壇;2005年05期

3 張志忠;從狂歡到救贖:世紀(jì)之交的文革敘述[J];當(dāng)代作家評(píng)論;2001年04期

4 吳承篤;;巴赫金的狂歡化理論對(duì)當(dāng)代大眾文化的啟示[J];東疆學(xué)刊;2006年01期

5 王寧;巴赫金之于“文化研究”的意義[J];俄羅斯文藝;2002年02期

6 李兆林;巴赫金論民間狂歡節(jié)笑文化和拉伯雷的創(chuàng)作初探[J];俄羅斯文藝;1998年04期

7 程正民;狂歡式的思維和藝術(shù)思維[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

8 夏忠憲;《紅樓夢(mèng)》與狂歡化、民間詼諧文化[J];紅樓夢(mèng)學(xué)刊;1999年03期

9 修倜;“狂歡化”理論與喜劇意識(shí)——巴赫金的啟示[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1603346