發(fā)布時間：2018-01-06 16:27

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：由主體到本體——伽達默爾游戲理論研究　出處：《曲阜師范大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 游戲 藝術(shù) 表現(xiàn) 語言 節(jié)日慶祝

【摘要】： 本文從伽達默爾游戲理論的基本概念入手對其加以分析,指出該理論與傳統(tǒng)游戲理論的根本不同。傳統(tǒng)游戲觀認為,人是游戲的主體,人的一切行為無論是現(xiàn)實生活還是藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作都是為了實現(xiàn)人的自由。人的自由在主體性美學那里被賦予了至高無上的地位。伽達默爾對這一觀點進行了反駁,指出在游戲中游戲者已不再是游戲的主體,游戲者只是游戲的組成部分,或者說是游戲?qū)崿F(xiàn)自我表現(xiàn)的執(zhí)行者,自我表現(xiàn)則是游戲的本質(zhì)�；谶@一點,觀賞者被放到了十分重要的地位,游戲中如果缺少了觀者,游戲就失去了意義,如同一部文學作品如果缺少了讀者的閱讀跟擺在地上的石頭沒有任何區(qū)別。因此,接受者對藝術(shù)作品的閱讀欣賞成為藝術(shù)作品不可或缺之維,這種本體論思維模式是對主體性認識論的巨大超越。不僅如此,伽達默爾還指出,游戲就是構(gòu)成物,游戲經(jīng)過轉(zhuǎn)化成為藝術(shù),這一轉(zhuǎn)化后的游戲就是構(gòu)成物,即藝術(shù)。 本文還從伽達默爾游戲理論的表現(xiàn)入手闡明其理論對主體性美學的顛覆。主要從兩個方面闡述伽達默爾游戲理論的表現(xiàn)：語言游戲和節(jié)日慶祝�！墩胬砼c方法》對語言的理解及分析,不僅闡述了視域融合、時間距離、效果歷史等概念,更重要的是對語言游戲進行了獨特的解釋,認為語言游戲就是理解,本質(zhì)上是解釋者與文本之間的對話,在此游戲過程中,雙方所談事物本身達于語言�？梢�,在理解活動中人與文本不再處于對立狀態(tài),而是通過語言融為一體。這一點是對主體性美學所主張的主客二元對立的否定與批判。伽達默爾游戲理論的另一個表現(xiàn)即節(jié)日慶祝,體現(xiàn)在他的晚期著作《美的現(xiàn)實性》中,該著作不僅系統(tǒng)地闡述了游戲的基本特征,還對游戲的時間性作了具體的分析,賦予了節(jié)日慶祝不同于其它時間的特性。一般人認為游戲只表現(xiàn)于一定的空間,其實不然,它在時間上也有一定的表現(xiàn)。伽達默爾將時間分為空洞的時間和充實的時間,只有在充實的時間里,人們才會去欣賞、閱讀停留的瞬間,人們才能喪失自己的個體性而融入到作為整體的節(jié)慶游戲中。本文正是從大多研究者所忽略的游戲的時間性入手對伽達默爾的游戲理論展開進一步論述的。 在后現(xiàn)代語境下,伽達默爾游戲理論的精神日益彰顯出它特有的當代意義,它以本體論為出發(fā)點和落腳點,有助于我們更好地從美學角度探討如何掙脫物欲的束縛,真正促進人的全面和諧發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:This paper from the basic concept of Gadamer's game theory of the analysis, pointed out that the theory is fundamentally different and traditional game theory. The traditional view of the game, who is the subject of the game, all human behavior in real life and art creation is to realize people's freedom. The freedom of the people in the subjective aesthetic there is given the supreme position. Gadamer refutes this view, the game in the game is no longer the subject of the game, the player is just part of the game, or a game of self realization is performed, self-expression is the nature of the game. Based on this point, the viewer is on the very the important position of the game without the viewer, the game has no meaning, as a literary works without the readers in the stone with no What difference. Therefore, the recipients of the works of art appreciation of works of art become the indispensable dimension, the ontological thinking mode is of great understanding of transcendental subjectivity. Not only that, Gadamer also pointed out that the game is a game, transformed into art, this is the game after transformation components, i.e. art.
This paper starts with the theory of subjectivity aesthetics from the Gadamer game theory. Mainly expounds Gadamer's game theory from two aspects: language games and festivals. Truth and method > understanding and analysis of language, not only describes the fusion of horizons, time distance, effective history concept, more important is a unique interpretation of language game, that is to understand the essence of language game, is explained and the text of the dialogue, in the course of the game, both of which things themselves in language. Therefore, in understanding human activities with the text is no longer in a state of confrontation, but through language. This point is the subject of two opposite and negative criticism advocated in subjectivity aesthetics. Another aspect of Gadamer's game theory of holiday celebrations, reflected in his later works "beauty Reality ", the author expounds the basic characteristics of the game, the game time also made specific analysis, given the festival is different from other time. Most people think the game only in a certain space, in fact, it also has a certain performance in time. Gadamer will be divided into empty time and full time, only in full time, people will go to enjoy reading, stay the moment, people can lose his own individuality and into the festival game as a whole. This is the time ignored by most researchers from the game of Gadamer the game theory is further discussed.
In the post-modern context, the spirit of Gadamer's game theory is increasingly showing its unique contemporary significance. Taking ontology as its starting point and foothold, it helps us to better explore how to get rid of the constraints of material desires from an aesthetic point of view, and truly promote the all-round and harmonious development of human beings.

【學位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：I01

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張公善;海德格爾美學的歷史地位及當代意義[J];安徽大學學報;2003年03期

2 王業(yè)偉;;試論伽達默爾藝術(shù)作品時間性概念[J];國際關(guān)系學院學報;2008年02期

3 白雪;;伽達默爾詮釋學語言觀及其現(xiàn)代意義[J];廣西社會科學;2007年09期

4 徐岱;;審美者與游戲人——關(guān)于藝術(shù)精神的一種詮釋[J];杭州師范學院學報(社會科學版);2006年02期

5 谷鵬飛;;西方語境中的海德格爾審美現(xiàn)代性思想論析[J];陜西理工學院學報(社會科學版);2006年03期

6 肖建華,肖明華;歷史·游戲·真理——伽達默爾美學思想探新[J];柳州師專學報;2004年02期

7 戚雨村;索緒爾符號價值理論[J];外語研究;2001年02期

8 王峰;作為偶緣性的游戲——伽達默爾游戲觀解析[J];求是學刊;2004年05期

9 紀光欣;論伽達默爾哲學解釋學的語言觀[J];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2002年02期

10 劉昱;;理解與語言的共在[J];吉林師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 吳玉英;“詩意棲居”的美學之思[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1388649