目的論理論下的《牡丹亭》兩譯本的文化負(fù)載詞對比分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-12-11 13:37
湯顯祖在1598年完成了《牡丹亭還魂記》的寫作。這本書一出來就轟動(dòng)當(dāng)時(shí)的文壇，“家傳戶誦，幾令《西廂》減價(jià)”（沈德符《顧曲雜言》）。作為古代四大名劇之一，《牡丹亭》以其優(yōu)美絢麗的文字表達(dá)，幽婉動(dòng)人的故事情節(jié)以及生動(dòng)形象的人物描寫在舞臺上經(jīng)久不衰。除了文學(xué)價(jià)值之外，《牡丹亭》還具有較高的文化價(jià)值。全劇共55出，包含了600多個(gè)文化意象，反映了中國古代歷史、社會(huì)、宗教、神話，具有濃厚的民族色彩，是研究古代文化的重要素材。因此，準(zhǔn)確的將源語的文化內(nèi)涵傳遞給目的語讀者，實(shí)現(xiàn)跨文化的交流，成為《牡丹亭》翻譯的重中之重。20世紀(jì)70年代德國的功能主義翻譯理論開辟了解決文化翻譯的新途徑。其核心理論目的論構(gòu)建了以目的法則為基礎(chǔ)的譯本翻譯和譯本評價(jià)體系。它認(rèn)為翻譯是一種有目的的跨文化的交際行為，譯者根據(jù)預(yù)期的目的決定所采用的翻譯策略和方法。因而，同一個(gè)原文會(huì)因不同的目的而產(chǎn)生不同的譯文和翻譯類型。在目的論中，目的文本好壞的評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不是等值而是充分發(fā)揮了譯者想要譯文發(fā)揮的作用。作者從目的論的視角分別對白之與汪榕培教授的《牡丹亭》的兩部英文全譯本進(jìn)行文化層次上的比較分析，深入研究了譯者的翻譯目的如何影響譯者...
【文章來源】：上海外國語大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁數(shù)】：59 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Previous Research in The Translation of The Peony Pavilion
1.2 Previous Research on The Skopos Theory
1.2.1 Background of The Skopos Theory in The Functionalism Frame
1.2.2 The Skopos Theory
1.2.3 The Skopos Theory in Literary Translation
Chapter Two The Peony Pavilion and Its English Translated versions
2.1 Introduction to Tang Xianzu and The Peony Pavilion
2.1.1 Tang Xianzu
2.1.2 The Peony Pavilion
2.1.3 Evaluation of The Peony Pavilion
2.2 Main Translated Versions of The Peony Pavilion
2.2.1 The History of English Translation for The Peony Pavillion
2.2.2 Cyril Birch’s Skopos and Translated Version
2.2.3 Wang Rongpei’s Skopos and His Translated Version
Chapter Three Comparative Study of the Translation of Culture-loaded Terms
3.1 Translation of Culture-loaded Terms in The Peony Pavilion from the Perspective of the Skopos Theory
3.1.1 Ecological Culture-loaded Terms
3.1.2 Social Culture-loaded Terms
3.1.3 Historical Culture-loaded Terms
3.1.4 Religious Culture-loaded Terms
3.2 The Application of The Skopos Theory in the Translation of The Peony Pavilion
3.2.1 The Addressee Involved in the Translation Process
3.2.2 The Strategies of the Translation from the Translator’s Skopos
Conclusion
Bibliography
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]《牡丹亭》的英譯及傳播[J]. 汪榕培. 外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 1999(06)
本文編號：3534776
【文章來源】：上海外國語大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁數(shù)】：59 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Previous Research in The Translation of The Peony Pavilion
1.2 Previous Research on The Skopos Theory
1.2.1 Background of The Skopos Theory in The Functionalism Frame
1.2.2 The Skopos Theory
1.2.3 The Skopos Theory in Literary Translation
Chapter Two The Peony Pavilion and Its English Translated versions
2.1 Introduction to Tang Xianzu and The Peony Pavilion
2.1.1 Tang Xianzu
2.1.2 The Peony Pavilion
2.1.3 Evaluation of The Peony Pavilion
2.2 Main Translated Versions of The Peony Pavilion
2.2.1 The History of English Translation for The Peony Pavillion
2.2.2 Cyril Birch’s Skopos and Translated Version
2.2.3 Wang Rongpei’s Skopos and His Translated Version
Chapter Three Comparative Study of the Translation of Culture-loaded Terms
3.1 Translation of Culture-loaded Terms in The Peony Pavilion from the Perspective of the Skopos Theory
3.1.1 Ecological Culture-loaded Terms
3.1.2 Social Culture-loaded Terms
3.1.3 Historical Culture-loaded Terms
3.1.4 Religious Culture-loaded Terms
3.2 The Application of The Skopos Theory in the Translation of The Peony Pavilion
3.2.1 The Addressee Involved in the Translation Process
3.2.2 The Strategies of the Translation from the Translator’s Skopos
Conclusion
Bibliography
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]《牡丹亭》的英譯及傳播[J]. 汪榕培. 外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 1999(06)
本文編號：3534776
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/3534776.html
教材專著
