【摘要】：文藝與資本、市場(chǎng)之間的糾葛盤根錯(cuò)節(jié),端繁緒雜,迄今仍是文藝研究中尚未徹底厘清的重要課題。以馬克思主義藝術(shù)生產(chǎn)論為指導(dǎo),現(xiàn)代文藝觀念的發(fā)生與創(chuàng)作實(shí)踐的展開,資本的孕育與促動(dòng)具有決定性的意義。借助市場(chǎng)的平臺(tái)與力量,現(xiàn)代文藝的生產(chǎn)者與消費(fèi)者經(jīng)由審美愉悅的滿足而在感性力量上獲得空前深廣的解放,同時(shí)憑依托于資本市場(chǎng)的沙龍、雜志、講座、學(xué)科建制與網(wǎng)絡(luò)等為載體,文藝實(shí)踐從古典形態(tài)的寄身附庸性存在漸趨衍化為具有相對(duì)獨(dú)立性的,影響、介入甚至左右社會(huì)歷史進(jìn)程與價(jià)值取向生成的現(xiàn)代公共場(chǎng)域。文藝創(chuàng)作在審美質(zhì)地上量勝于質(zhì)、趣味低俗的亂象,在市場(chǎng)的推助下被凸顯與放大,但后者并非前者根本的、甚至真正的"元兇"。由于市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)自身具有的調(diào)節(jié)過濾機(jī)制和藝術(shù)消費(fèi)者積極主觀能動(dòng)性的發(fā)揮,現(xiàn)代文藝創(chuàng)作的藝術(shù)性和商品性一般會(huì)達(dá)至動(dòng)態(tài)平衡,我們并不需對(duì)市場(chǎng)之于文藝的傷害過于焦慮與擔(dān)憂。審美是資本主義機(jī)制提取并生發(fā)出的一套論證資本主義文化合法性、抑制異質(zhì)因素對(duì)資本抵抗的話語,以其為尺度貶斥市場(chǎng)語境下的藝術(shù)生產(chǎn),勢(shì)將自陷于以子之矛攻子之盾的失據(jù)窘境。資本高度集中運(yùn)作和新興媒介技術(shù)深度介入,令以個(gè)體精神與審美創(chuàng)造為特質(zhì)的現(xiàn)代文藝正遭受嚴(yán)重挑戰(zhàn),文學(xué)藝術(shù)實(shí)踐面臨深刻轉(zhuǎn)型。
[Abstract]:The dispute between literature and art and the capital and the market is an important subject that has not yet been completely clarified in the literature and art research. With the development of Marxist art production theory, the development of modern literature and art concept and the development of creative practice, the birth and actuation of capital is of decisive significance. With the help of the platform and power of the market, the producers and consumers of the modern art and art obtain an unprecedented and extensive liberation through the satisfaction of the aesthetic pleasure, and at the same time, on the basis of the salon, the magazine, the lecture, the subject formation and the network, etc. of the capital market as the carrier, In the literature and art practice, there is a trend of the consignification of the classical form to the modern public field which has the relative independence, the influence, the intervention and even the historical process and the value orientation of the left and right society. The artistic creation in the aesthetic texture is superior to the quality and the taste of the vulgar, and is highlighted and amplified with the help of the market, but the latter is not the former and even the real "to be an accomplice". Because the market economy itself has the function of adjusting the filtering mechanism and the active subjective initiative of the art consumers, the artistry and the commodity property of the modern literary and art creation generally reach the dynamic balance, and we do not need to be too anxious and worried about the damage to the market to the literature and art. The aesthetic is a set of proof of the legitimacy of the capitalist culture which is extracted by the capitalist mechanism, and the discourse of the foreign factors on the capital's resistance is restrained. With the highly centralized operation of capital and the advanced intervention of the new media technology, the modern literature and art, which is characterized by the individual spirit and the aesthetic creation, are faced with serious challenges, and the literature and art practice is undergoing profound transformation.
【作者單位】： 華中師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)的中國(guó)形態(tài)”子課題階段性成果(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):11ZD078)
【分類號(hào)】：J114

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李靜;;劉益謙:資本市場(chǎng)與藝術(shù)市場(chǎng)是兩碼事[J];藝術(shù)與投資;2009年07期

2 曹葦舫;論藝術(shù)傳達(dá)的構(gòu)成與發(fā)生[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年06期

3 新泉 ,魯強(qiáng);弗洛伊德精神分析學(xué)說與文學(xué)——中山大學(xué)中文系部分師生“現(xiàn)代文藝思潮研討會(huì)”發(fā)言[J];文藝?yán)碚撆c批評(píng);1991年03期

4 胡家祥;浪漫主義是現(xiàn)代文藝的主潮[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1991年Z1期

5 張清民;四十年代:中國(guó)現(xiàn)代文藝?yán)碚撔螒B(tài)的確立[J];文藝?yán)碚撆c批評(píng);2001年04期

6 汪vパ，

本文編號(hào)：2522246