【摘要】：加拿大人文科學(xué)領(lǐng)域最杰出的學(xué)者——諾斯洛普·弗萊，在其經(jīng)典的文學(xué)批評理論建立過程中，大量運用了人類學(xué)、歷史學(xué)、心理學(xué)等學(xué)科知識，這種跨學(xué)科的創(chuàng)新研究，拓寬了傳統(tǒng)的文學(xué)批評理論視域，從而，形成了一種大文化觀的文學(xué)批評視野，人們后來通常把這種批評理論稱之為“文學(xué)人類學(xué)批評”。追溯弗萊“文學(xué)人類學(xué)”理論的形成過程，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，弗萊最早的文學(xué)人類學(xué)思想來源其自身的原始情結(jié)，其次在于其作為一位人類學(xué)家對自然的關(guān)注，在此基礎(chǔ)上，弗萊通過對大量具體的文學(xué)作家作品及文學(xué)現(xiàn)象的分析，結(jié)合“退后看”的方法，形成了一種總體的文學(xué)觀念；隨后，在總體的文學(xué)觀中，弗萊尋覓到了文學(xué)的神話“原型”，歸納出了文學(xué)發(fā)展史中的典型模式；進而通過對典型模式的總結(jié)，發(fā)現(xiàn)了文學(xué)對自然的模仿及文學(xué)發(fā)展過程中與自然循環(huán)規(guī)律的相似之處，這一理論的形成過程中，始終滲透著文學(xué)批評與人類學(xué)知識的交匯，由此形成了弗萊獨特的文學(xué)人類學(xué)思想。我們知道，文學(xué)人類學(xué)是20世紀中國人文學(xué)界富于創(chuàng)新力的新興學(xué)科，弗萊正是這一學(xué)科的奠基者之一，弗萊文學(xué)人類學(xué)思想的形成過程研究，不僅能使我們對這位文學(xué)批評家及其文學(xué)批評理論有更全面的認識，還能充實我們的文學(xué)人類學(xué)知識，使我們更全面的認識文學(xué)人類學(xué)這一學(xué)科的真實內(nèi)涵，從而進一步把握和理解這一學(xué)科的歷史發(fā)展過程，揭示人類生活及文化在文學(xué)中的關(guān)聯(lián)和作用。同時，，為文藝學(xué)乃至整個人文社會科學(xué)研究提供一種創(chuàng)新的理論范式及綜合性的研究方法。
[Abstract]:Northrop Frye, one of the most outstanding scholars in the field of human sciences in Canada, used a great deal of knowledge of anthropology, history, psychology and other disciplines in the course of establishing his classical literary criticism theory. It broadens the field of view of traditional literary criticism theory, and thus forms a kind of literary criticism field of view of broad cultural view, which is usually called "literary anthropological criticism" later. Tracing back to the formation of Frye's Theory of Literary Anthropology, we find that Frye's earliest thought of literary anthropology originated from his own primitive complex, followed by his concern for nature as an anthropologist, and on this basis, Through the analysis of a large number of concrete literary writers' works and literary phenomena, Frye formed a general literary concept by combining the method of "looking back". Later, in the overall view of literature, Frye found the myth of literature "archetypes", and summed up the typical model in the history of literature development; Through summarizing the typical models, the author finds out the similarities between literary imitation of nature and the law of natural circulation in the process of literary development. The formation of this theory always permeates the intersection of literary criticism and anthropological knowledge. As a result, Frye's unique thought of literary anthropology was formed. As we know, literary anthropology is a new and innovative discipline in the 20th century in Chinese humanities field. Frye is one of the founders of this discipline, and the formation process of Frye's thought of literary anthropology is studied. Not only can we have a more comprehensive understanding of this literary critic and his theory of literary criticism, but also can enrich our knowledge of literary anthropology, so that we can more comprehensively understand the true connotation of the subject of literary anthropology. So as to further grasp and understand the historical development process of this subject, reveal the relationship and role of human life and culture in literature. At the same time, it provides an innovative theoretical paradigm and comprehensive research method for literary and art studies and even the whole humanities and social sciences.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I06

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜昌忠;論弗萊的三種語言模式[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年03期

2 華翔;;富于想象力的遠見:弗萊思想的啟示之光[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年02期

3 王寧;弗萊:當代文化批評的先驅(qū)者[J];外國文學(xué);2001年03期

4 杜佳;;對弗萊《批評的解剖》文學(xué)循環(huán)觀的探源[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2007年06期

5 喻琴;;弗萊和伊瑟爾的文學(xué)人類學(xué)思想之比較[J];理論月刊;2008年03期

6 喻琴;;多維視野中的弗萊理論研究[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2008年02期

7 王爽;;缺失與創(chuàng)造——《批評的解剖》的歷史局限及其理論價值[J];青年教師學(xué)報;2007年06期

8 徐新建;文學(xué)人類學(xué):中西交流中的兼容與發(fā)展[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;2001年04期

9 彭兆榮;邊界不設(shè)防:人類學(xué)與文學(xué)研究[J];文藝研究;1997年01期

10 賀麗;;諾思洛普·弗萊國內(nèi)外研究綜述[J];湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期

本文編號：2460042