�？思{與蘇童小說(shuō)時(shí)間觀之比較
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-15 14:13
【摘要】： 時(shí)間自覺(jué)是現(xiàn)代小說(shuō)的重要標(biāo)志,因此,時(shí)間問(wèn)題日趨成為學(xué)界新的研究方向和討論熱點(diǎn)。美國(guó)著名作家福克納便是時(shí)間意識(shí)極為強(qiáng)烈的一位作家,時(shí)間意識(shí)在他的小說(shuō)中有著明顯的體現(xiàn)。曾在多種公開(kāi)場(chǎng)合聲稱自己深受�？思{影響的中國(guó)作家蘇童,在學(xué)習(xí)了福克納“約克納帕塔法”地域描寫(xiě)的同時(shí),也潛移默化地接受了生存于這片土地上的形形色色的人們的時(shí)間觀念。本文擬用比較文學(xué)平行研究的方法,透視�？思{和蘇童兩位作家作品中的時(shí)間意識(shí)及其產(chǎn)生的現(xiàn)實(shí)淵源,在比較文本創(chuàng)作的同與不同過(guò)程中,審視中西方文學(xué)的互動(dòng)與差異。 本文分為四章,第一章從創(chuàng)作主題方面闡釋兩位作家各自作品中體現(xiàn)出的時(shí)間觀念;第二章從作品人物角度分析兩位作家小說(shuō)中的時(shí)間意識(shí);第三章從敘述角度對(duì)兩位作家文本的時(shí)間問(wèn)題進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的探究;第四章則從養(yǎng)育兩位作家的不同南方世界,揭示他們各自時(shí)間觀的趨同性和差異性。從而得出這樣的結(jié)論:兩位作家都拒絕了時(shí)間的線性發(fā)展,給時(shí)間斬首,時(shí)間只存在于“過(guò)去——現(xiàn)在”兩個(gè)維度;不同的是�？思{時(shí)間觀是“現(xiàn)在指向過(guò)去”,蘇童時(shí)間觀則是“過(guò)去指向現(xiàn)在”。因此,福克納作品表面上離生活很近,但氣質(zhì)上離生活很遠(yuǎn),具有某種哲學(xué)永恒的味道;蘇童作品表面上離生活很遠(yuǎn),但氣質(zhì)上卻離生活很近,表現(xiàn)了人類生存的窘迫。
[Abstract]:Time consciousness is an important symbol of modern novel. Therefore, time problem has become a new research direction and discussion hot spot in academic circles. William Faulkner, a famous American writer, is a writer with a strong consciousness of time, which is clearly reflected in his novels. Su Tong, a Chinese writer who once claimed to be deeply influenced by Faulkner on many public occasions, studied Faulkner's regional description of Yorknapata at the same time. It also imperceptibly accepted the idea of time for all kinds of people who lived on this land. Using the method of parallel study of comparative literature, this paper explores the time consciousness and its origin in Faulkner's and Su Tong's works, and examines the interaction and difference between Chinese and western literature in the process of the similarities and differences in the creation of comparative texts. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter explains the concept of time embodied in the two writers' works from the point of view of the creation theme, the second chapter analyzes the time consciousness of the two writers' novels from the point of view of the characters in the works. The third chapter explores the time of the two writers' texts from the perspective of narration, and the fourth chapter reveals the convergence and difference of their respective views of time from the perspective of nurturing the different southern world of the two writers. As a result, the two writers rejected the linear development of time, beheaded time, time exists only in the past-present two dimensions; The difference is that Faulkner's view of time is "now pointing to the past", while Su Tong's view of time is "past pointing to the present". Therefore, Faulkner's works are close to life on the surface, but they are far from life in temperament and have some kind of eternal taste of philosophy. Su Tong's works are far away from life on the surface, but close to life in temperament, which shows the embarrassment of human existence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：I106.4;I0-03
本文編號(hào)：2458218
[Abstract]:Time consciousness is an important symbol of modern novel. Therefore, time problem has become a new research direction and discussion hot spot in academic circles. William Faulkner, a famous American writer, is a writer with a strong consciousness of time, which is clearly reflected in his novels. Su Tong, a Chinese writer who once claimed to be deeply influenced by Faulkner on many public occasions, studied Faulkner's regional description of Yorknapata at the same time. It also imperceptibly accepted the idea of time for all kinds of people who lived on this land. Using the method of parallel study of comparative literature, this paper explores the time consciousness and its origin in Faulkner's and Su Tong's works, and examines the interaction and difference between Chinese and western literature in the process of the similarities and differences in the creation of comparative texts. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter explains the concept of time embodied in the two writers' works from the point of view of the creation theme, the second chapter analyzes the time consciousness of the two writers' novels from the point of view of the characters in the works. The third chapter explores the time of the two writers' texts from the perspective of narration, and the fourth chapter reveals the convergence and difference of their respective views of time from the perspective of nurturing the different southern world of the two writers. As a result, the two writers rejected the linear development of time, beheaded time, time exists only in the past-present two dimensions; The difference is that Faulkner's view of time is "now pointing to the past", while Su Tong's view of time is "past pointing to the present". Therefore, Faulkner's works are close to life on the surface, but they are far from life in temperament and have some kind of eternal taste of philosophy. Su Tong's works are far away from life on the surface, but close to life in temperament, which shows the embarrassment of human existence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：I106.4;I0-03
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李婷婷;蘇童小說(shuō)創(chuàng)作中的兒童視角[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2458218
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2458218.html
教材專著
