【摘要】：正改革開放之初,面對文學(xué)拘囿于政治牢籠的狀況,學(xué)界以文學(xué)"純"化、"審美"化、"主體"化作為知識策略(也就是"去政治化"),拯救文學(xué)于水生火熱之中,肯定了文學(xué)的自主性,功不可沒。然而,作為"策略"行為的"審美"、"美感"、"純化"不知不覺中卻形成了一種新型的"審美霸權(quán)"與"美感殖民",文學(xué)已然成為了"審美"單向度的存在,甚至諱言任何文學(xué)與外在的關(guān)聯(lián)。文學(xué)好不容易走出了"政治城",卻不小心又跌人了"審美自主城"。面對此種現(xiàn)狀,學(xué)界開始了對文學(xué)政治維度
[Abstract]:At the beginning of reform and opening up, in the face of the situation that literature is confined to political cages, the academic circles turn literature into "pure", "aesthetic" and "subject" as knowledge strategy (that is, "depoliticization"), and save literature in the hot water. Affirmed the autonomy of literature, the contribution can not be ignored. However, as the "aesthetic", "aesthetic feeling" and "purification" of "strategic" behavior, a new type of "aesthetic hegemony" and "aesthetic colonization" have been formed unconsciously, and literature has become the existence of "aesthetic" unidirectional degree. It is not even true that any literature is related to the outside. Literature is not easy to walk out of the "political city", but inadvertently fell to the "aesthetic autonomous city." In the face of this situation, the academic circles began to study the political dimension of literature.
【作者單位】： 河南師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)項目“布爾迪厄文藝思想與中國當(dāng)代文論建設(shè)”階段性成果,項目編號:12YJC751046
【分類號】：I0-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 陶東風(fēng);;文學(xué)公共領(lǐng)域的理想類型與應(yīng)然品格[J];東方叢刊;2008年04期

2 金生，

本文編號：2364707