本文選題：媚俗 + 先鋒�。� 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以藝術(shù)中媚俗與先鋒互仿現(xiàn)象為切入點(diǎn)，針對(duì)當(dāng)前媚俗與先鋒現(xiàn)象互仿研究，通過考察西方藝術(shù)史，以當(dāng)代哲學(xué)美學(xué)為思想指導(dǎo)，著重論述媚俗與先鋒互仿現(xiàn)象的原因，并對(duì)其產(chǎn)生的影響進(jìn)行論述。 本文采用歷史分析與邏輯推導(dǎo)相結(jié)合的方法，，在緒論部分著重考察媚俗與先鋒互仿現(xiàn)象的研究現(xiàn)狀，闡述本選題的意義及創(chuàng)新之處。全文共分三章： 第一章論述當(dāng)代藝術(shù)媚俗與先鋒互仿的表現(xiàn)。分別追溯了媚俗與先鋒的歷史源頭：媚俗指的是造假、模仿、廉價(jià)的大眾藝術(shù)，媚俗是對(duì)“美”的戲仿；而先鋒派最早來自于軍事、政治是一種不斷反叛甚至反叛自身的藝術(shù)，先鋒派是對(duì)“真”的戲仿，在此基礎(chǔ)之上媚俗與先鋒互仿得以可能，即媚俗模仿先鋒和先鋒模仿媚俗。 第二章具體分析了媚俗與先鋒互仿的三大原因。第一、日常生活審美化，藝術(shù)與生活的界限逐漸模糊。第二，大眾媒介手段的介入，大眾媒介創(chuàng)造了一種抹平的文化，在先鋒與媚俗的互仿中，藝術(shù)變得既不是先鋒也不是媚俗而是一種全面抹平的文化。第三、藝術(shù)與商業(yè)的結(jié)合是藝術(shù)走向市場(chǎng)，走向世俗化的過程。 第三章指出了媚俗與先鋒互仿的影響，即：藝術(shù)與非藝術(shù)界限的消失、藝術(shù)內(nèi)部界限的消失、雅俗界限的消失和真實(shí)與虛構(gòu)的界限的消失。闡明了當(dāng)代藝術(shù)中媚俗與先鋒互仿現(xiàn)象的影響。 結(jié)論部分總結(jié)全文，闡明對(duì)當(dāng)代藝術(shù)中媚俗與先鋒的探討有助于理解當(dāng)代藝術(shù)，揭示媚俗與先鋒互仿現(xiàn)象的存在本質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:Taking the phenomenon of the mutual imitation of kitsch and Avantgarde in art as the breakthrough point, this paper aims at the study of the mutual imitation of kitsch and vanguard, and through the investigation of the history of Western art and the thought of contemporary philosophy and aesthetics, focuses on the reasons of the phenomenon of the mutual imitation of kitsch and vanguard, and discusses its influence.
This paper adopts the method of combining historical analysis with logical deduction, and focuses on the research status of the phenomenon of kitsch and vanguard interaction in the introduction part, and expounds the significance and innovation of this topic. The full text is divided into three chapters:
The first chapter discusses the expression of the mutual imitation of the contemporary art of kitsch and Avantgarde. It traces back to the historical origins of kitsch and vanguard: kitsch refers to counterfeiting, imitation, cheap mass art, kitsch is parody of "beauty", and the avantgarde is first from the military, and the politics is a kind of constantly rebellious and even rebellious art, the avant-garde is the " On the basis of the parody of truth, it is possible that kitsch and vanguard can be imitated each other, that is, kitsch imitate vanguard and vanguard imitate vulgarity.
The second chapter concretely analyzes the three reasons for the mutual imitation of kitsch and vanguard. First, the beauty of daily life is beautified, and the boundary between art and life is gradually blurred. Second, the mass media means the intervention, the mass media creates a kind of smooth culture. In the avantgarde and kitsch, the art becomes neither vanguard nor kitsch but a comprehensive application. Flat culture. Third, the combination of art and commerce is the process of art going to the market and secularization.
The third chapter points out the influence of the mutual imitation of kitsch and Avantgarde, that is, the disappearance of the boundary between art and non art, the disappearance of the inner boundary of art, the disappearance of the boundary of elegance and vulgarity and the disappearance of the boundary between the real and the fictitious.
The conclusion summarizes the whole article, and expounds that the exploration of kitsch and vanguard in contemporary art helps to understand contemporary art and reveal the essence of the phenomenon of imitation between the vulgar and the vanguard.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：J0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 克萊門特·格林伯格;秦兆凱;;前衛(wèi)與媚俗[J];美術(shù)觀察;2007年05期

2 易英;全球化背景下的中國前衛(wèi)藝術(shù)[J];美術(shù)研究;2001年03期

3 何桂彥;;“新媚俗”繪畫的三種類型[J];美術(shù)研究;2008年01期

4 景凱旋;關(guān)于“刻奇”[J];書屋;2001年12期

5 何桂彥;;對(duì)新媚俗主義的批判[J];中國書畫;2007年07期

本文編號(hào)：2057270