本文選題：圖像化 + 語言文化��； 參考：《吉林大學》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】： 對視覺文化的研究一直都強調(diào)“圖像轉(zhuǎn)向”,即強調(diào)圖像本身是一個自足封閉的世界,它不需要指涉意義,自身就是一切,切斷了走向語言式深層探索的可能路途。波德里亞也指出圖像社會是一個“仿像”的社會,它與現(xiàn)實毫無關(guān)系。該理論容易把人引向?qū)D像化時代的誤解,即認為圖像化時代是完全切斷與語言文化的一切關(guān)系,是獨立自足的。 一方面,本文從理論層面探討了圖像化時代的后現(xiàn)代本質(zhì)——“圖像化”,即將一切東西圖像化、視覺化。圖像化的結(jié)果表現(xiàn)為兩個主要傾向:第一,消解“語言邏各斯”,代之以“后語言”。同時,把語言的多義性、任意性賦予語言,使它的意義外延。第二,圖像化改變關(guān)于文學的真實的概念,代之以“超現(xiàn)實”。 另一方面,本文從文學實踐的角度證明,圖像化使文學呈現(xiàn)出不同以往的樣貌,即文學的后現(xiàn)代性:(1)文學圖像化(2)文學的虛擬游戲(3)文學商品化。對于文學的后現(xiàn)代性表現(xiàn),國內(nèi)學者看法不一,有人認為這是文學喪失“自我”的表現(xiàn),文學在影像的排擠下走向終結(jié)。本文指出:圖像作為一種多維語言,在本質(zhì)上并不排斥文學的詩意,影像和文學一樣都在尋找人的詩意生存,即人的本真生活。 現(xiàn)代圖像出現(xiàn)了低質(zhì)化傾向,這是圖像化時代過分強調(diào)視覺表象的結(jié)果。在圖像化時代,文學為影像提供了精神資源和文化動力,把影像帶出低質(zhì)和媚俗的陰影;同時影像也為文學注入活力,使文學獲得審美再生。兩者互動共融,共同撐起文化的天空。
[Abstract]:The study of visual culture has always emphasized the "image turning", that is, the image itself is a self-contained and closed world, it does not need to refer to meaning, and itself is everything, cutting off the possible way to the deep exploration of language. Baudrillard also pointed out that image society is an "image society", it has nothing to do with reality. This theory can easily lead people to misunderstand the era of image, that is to say, the era of image is completely cut off all relations with language and culture, and it is independent and self-sufficient. On the one hand, this paper discusses the post-modern essence of the image age, that is, everything is visualized and visualized. There are two main tendencies in pictualization: first, to dispel "linguistic logos" and replace it with "post-language". At the same time, the polysemy and arbitrariness of language are given to language to denote its meaning. Secondly, picturesque changes the concept of literary reality and replaces it with surrealism. On the other hand, from the point of view of literary practice, this paper proves that image-oriented literature presents a different appearance than before, that is, the postmodernism of literature: 1) literary imagetization / 2) the virtual game of literature and the commercialization of literature. There are different views on the postmodernity of literature. Some people think that it is the manifestation of literature losing "self", and literature is pushed out of the image to the end. This paper points out that image, as a multi-dimensional language, does not reject the poetic meaning of literature in essence. Image and literature are all looking for the poetic existence of human beings, that is, the real life of human beings. Modern images tend to be of low quality, which is the result of excessive emphasis on visual representation in the image age. In the image age, literature provides the spiritual resources and cultural power for the image, and brings the image out of the shadow of low quality and vulgarity. At the same time, the image also infuses the vitality into the literature and makes the literature obtain aesthetic regeneration. The two interacts and melts together to support the cultural sky together.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：I022

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 杭迪;《W.J.T.米歇爾的圖像理論和視覺文化理論研究》[D];山東大學;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 明亮;“平面化”抉擇[D];華中師范大學;2008年

2 黃大鵬;解放與異化[D];南昌大學;2008年

3 唐彩云;電子媒介時代文學與圖像的共生關(guān)系研究[D];廣西師范大學;2010年

4 郭容蓉;中學語文教學內(nèi)容圖像化的影響及對策[D];中央民族大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1836893