本文關(guān)鍵詞： 曹操 氣出倡 樂(lè)舞百戲 公宴詩(shī)　出處：《中國(guó)典籍與文化》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：曹操《氣出倡》三首是模擬漢代古曲之作,古辭丟失,曲題難明。古今學(xué)人對(duì)曹操之作頗多誤解,如認(rèn)定為游仙之作,沒(méi)有積極意義,且與曹操"性不信天命""見(jiàn)欺神仙"之精神相悖。本文經(jīng)多方考索分析,以為曹操《氣出倡》并非求仙之作,而是描摹由"仙倡"表演的樂(lè)舞百戲,并對(duì)漢古曲《氣出》之題義作出蠡測(cè),其與漢代迎氣活動(dòng)密切相關(guān),類似于"月令迎氣樂(lè)"的樂(lè)舞表演。在此基礎(chǔ)上,聯(lián)系建安時(shí)期的公宴詩(shī)予以多方證明,《氣出倡》三首為"游宴"而非"游仙"。曹操本人在求仙態(tài)度方面并無(wú)矛盾之處。
[Abstract]:Cao Cao's three works are to imitate the ancient songs of the Han Dynasty. The ancient words are lost and the title is difficult to understand. Ancient and modern scholars have quite a lot of misunderstandings about the works of Cao Cao, such as the works of traveling immortals, there is no positive significance. And it is contrary to Cao Cao's spirit of "seeing and deceiving the Immortals". This article, by various textual research and analysis, thinks that Cao Cao is not seeking immortals, but depicting the music and dance operas performed by "immortals". It is closely related to the activities of welcoming Qi in the Han Dynasty, which is similar to the music and dance performance of "Yue Ling Ying Qi Yue". On this basis, it is proved by the public banquet poems in Jian'an period. The three songs are "banquets" rather than "immortals". Cao Cao himself has no contradiction in his attitude towards immortality.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：博士后基金面上項(xiàng)目一等資助“擬詩(shī)與中古詩(shī)學(xué)傳統(tǒng)的建構(gòu)與演進(jìn)”(2016M590056)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：J709.2
【正文快照】： 考之相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),《氣出倡》原為漢曲�！段倪x》卷一八馬融《長(zhǎng)笛賦序》有云:“有洛客舍逆旅,吹笛,為《氣出》《精列》相和�！崩钌谱⒁陡桎洝吩�:“《古相和歌》十八曲,《氣出》一,《精列》二�！段何涞奂酚小稓獬觥贰毒小范徘！�(1)《宋書·樂(lè)志》載錄曹操此曲,題作《，

本文編號(hào)：1474800