在歷史中艱難跋涉—從女性視角看蕭紅寫作
本文選題:蕭紅 + 女性; 參考:《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:作為一個(gè)極具個(gè)人特色的女作家,蕭紅研究一直是文學(xué)史上的一大熱點(diǎn)。從30年代以抗日作家的稱號(hào)震動(dòng)上海文壇,到40年代以女性之名頗惹爭(zhēng)議,及至建國后的沉寂,再到80年作為女性作家被發(fā)掘,蕭紅的身份問題一直是學(xué)界糾纏不休的焦點(diǎn)所在。由于時(shí)代變化,蕭紅的女性身份往往被簡(jiǎn)化為“政治立場(chǎng)”,從而取消了蕭紅的復(fù)雜性和豐富性,對(duì)文本的解讀也陷入去歷史化的弊端;谶@一問題,本文試圖回到歷史,貼近蕭紅創(chuàng)作的時(shí)代,帶著時(shí)代感去參看蕭紅知識(shí)分子立場(chǎng)和女性身份對(duì)蕭紅寫作的影響,并將蕭紅寫作中所呈現(xiàn)的“差異”重新置于時(shí)代語境中去觀看,嘗試?yán)砬迨捈t寫作和時(shí)代之間的關(guān)系。第一章主要通過對(duì)蕭紅抗戰(zhàn)前作品的梳理,尋找出一條蕭紅由“五四”走向“革命文學(xué)”的通路。從《跋涉》到《商市街》,再到《手》,蕭紅在創(chuàng)作中持續(xù)思考著“階級(jí)”與“自我”的關(guān)系問題,隨著時(shí)間的推進(jìn),她對(duì)“階級(jí)”與自我的問題的理解也在不斷加深。女性經(jīng)驗(yàn)作為蕭紅創(chuàng)作中極為重要的資源,也參與到其階級(jí)意識(shí)的建構(gòu)當(dāng)中,使這些作品呈現(xiàn)出獨(dú)特的個(gè)人特質(zhì)。第二章主要以《生死場(chǎng)》為切入點(diǎn),考察蕭紅寫作中女性與階級(jí)、民族國家之間的關(guān)系!渡缊(chǎng)》作為蕭紅最具影響力和爭(zhēng)議性的作品,不同時(shí)代話語對(duì)其進(jìn)行了形態(tài)各異的解釋,女性、階級(jí)、民族國家話語的纏繞給《生死場(chǎng)》帶來了復(fù)雜性和豐富性。在《生死場(chǎng)》中,蕭紅以其女性獨(dú)特的視角,以有差異的性別經(jīng)驗(yàn)書寫了日本侵略前后鄉(xiāng)村、都市不同的社會(huì)景觀,為我們展示了性別、階級(jí)、民族國家在不同的場(chǎng)景中的互動(dòng)關(guān)系。第三章主要討論作為女性的蕭紅對(duì)抗戰(zhàn)的獨(dú)特思考以及這份思考在蕭紅的作品中是如何呈現(xiàn)的。蕭紅抗戰(zhàn)之后的寫作與主流抗戰(zhàn)作品之間的差異主要來自于她的女性視角。女性的敏感和弱者的處境使她更愿意從弱者的視角去觀看,書寫戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。她以《呼蘭河傳》表達(dá)了思念鄉(xiāng)土的情緒,同時(shí)又不失批判的眼光去觀看作為民族主體的中國人,關(guān)注弱勢(shì)的國民如何在殘酷的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中生活下去的問題。無論哪一種書寫都是同改造中國,建設(shè)新中國的美好愿景聯(lián)系在一起的。
[Abstract]:As a woman writer with personal characteristics, Xiao Hong has always been a hot spot in literary history.From the 1930s when the title of anti-Japanese writer shocked the literary world in Shanghai, to the 1940s in the name of women rather controversial, to the silence after the founding of the people's Republic of China, to 80 years as a female writer was discovered,Xiao Hong's identity has always been the focus of academic entanglement.Because of the change of times, Xiao Hong's female identity is often simplified as "political stand", thus canceling the complexity and richness of Xiao Hong, and the interpretation of the text is also trapped in the drawback of dehistorization.Based on this problem, this paper attempts to return to history, close to the era of Xiao Hong's creation, and take the sense of the times to see the influence of the intellectual position and female identity of Xiao Hong on Xiao Hong's writing.And put the difference in Xiao Hong's writing to the context of the times to try to clarify the relationship between the writing and the times.In the first chapter, by combing Xiao Hong's works before the War of Resistance against Japan, we find a path from the May 4th Movement to the Revolutionary Literature.From "trudging" to "Shang Shi Street" and then to "hand", Xiao Hong is constantly thinking about the relationship between "class" and "self" in his works. With the development of time, her understanding of "class" and "self" is also deepening.As an extremely important resource in Xiao Hong's creation, female experience also takes part in the construction of his class consciousness, which makes these works show unique personal characteristics.The second chapter focuses on the relationship between women, class and nation-state in Xiao Hong's writing. Life and death Field is the most influential and controversial work of Xiao Hong.The discourse of different times explains it in different forms. The intertwining of the discourse of women, classes and nation-states brings complexity and richness to the field of life and death.In "the Field of Life and death", Xiao Hong, from her unique female perspective, writes about the different social landscapes of the countryside and the city before and after the Japanese invasion with different gender experiences, which shows us the gender and class.The interaction of nation-state in different scenes.The third chapter mainly discusses Xiao Hong's unique thinking about the War of Resistance against Japan as a female and how this thought is presented in the works of Xiao Hong.The difference between Xiao Hong's writing after the War of Resistance and the mainstream works mainly comes from her female perspective.The sensitivity of women and the situation of the weak make her more willing to watch and write war from the perspective of the weak.She expressed her yearning for the native land with the biography of the Hulan River, and at the same time she looked at the Chinese as the main body of the nation without losing a critical eye, and paid attention to the problem of how the weak people lived in the cruel war.Either writing is linked to the vision of transforming China and building a new China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:I207.42
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張未民;;說說蕭紅,說說李澤厚——兼說“為生活立心”[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2011年05期
2 葛浩文;張莉;;“持久力”和“親切感”——兩代研究者關(guān)于蕭紅的對(duì)談[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2011年05期
3 徐坤;;蕭紅:凄絕的叛逆[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2011年05期
4 張莉;;一個(gè)作家的重生——關(guān)于蕭紅的當(dāng)代文學(xué)影響力[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2011年05期
5 王小妮;;蕭紅寫了兩部生死場(chǎng)——作家被時(shí)代浸襲與原態(tài)寫作的回歸[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2011年05期
6 劉森;;漂泊與皈依:論蕭紅在流亡中對(duì)“家”的悖論書寫[J];長春工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期
7 陳樹萍;再返《生死場(chǎng)》——評(píng)劉禾《文本、批評(píng)與民族國家文學(xué)》[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期
8 陳思和;啟蒙視角下的民間悲劇:《生死場(chǎng)》[J];天津師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期
9 摩羅;《生死場(chǎng)》的文本斷裂及蕭紅的文學(xué)貢獻(xiàn)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2003年10期
10 艾曉明;戲劇性諷刺──論蕭紅小說文體的獨(dú)特素質(zhì)[J];中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)研究叢刊;2002年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 周翔;“遷徙”與“封閉”的時(shí)空敘述[D];北京大學(xué);2013年
2 張新璐;女性經(jīng)驗(yàn):寫于“家”“國”的邊緣[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年
3 李梅艷;行進(jìn)中的自我尋找—論蕭紅[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年
4 項(xiàng)遠(yuǎn);蕭紅新論[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年
5 李瑋慧;現(xiàn)代女作家的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)書寫(1931-1945)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號(hào):1762226
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/1762226.html