本文選題：垂直性　切入點：嶺南園林　出處：《華南理工大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：本文中提到的“垂直性”是指園林建筑中二層及以上的樓所產生的垂直性發(fā)展的形式,也可以說是將園林建筑及其生活空間向高處發(fā)展的一個趨勢。之所以將其稱為“垂直性”,是因為大眾有一個普遍認同的觀點,那就是西方建筑是垂直性發(fā)展的,而東方建筑是平面性發(fā)展的。在園林著述中,嶺南園林的“垂直性”作為一個特征被很多學者提到,但亭臺樓閣在中國古典園林中一直是重要的組成元素,嶺南園林建筑的垂直性與江南北方園林中樓的垂直性區(qū)別是什么以及造成這種區(qū)別的原因是本文研究的關鍵內容。文章首先對嶺南園林與江南北方園林垂直性的發(fā)展過程進行分析。經過對比發(fā)現(xiàn),兩者在發(fā)展過程中“垂直性”的變化趨勢是基本相同的,也就是說垂直性的不同不在于“用或不用”的區(qū)別上,文章繼而對其“垂直性”的表現(xiàn)形式進行分析對比。通過對比發(fā)現(xiàn)嶺南園林與江南北方園林在“垂直性”的表現(xiàn)形式上有四點不同:嶺南園林觀景視點大多抬高至樓上,北方和江南園林多設在地面;嶺南園林的樓是連宇成片線性布置的,而北方和江南園林是“點狀”布置的樓;嶺南建筑的樓閣偏向公共性,北方和江南園林則偏重私密性;嶺南園林喜歡使用十幾米的高樓,而在江南和北方園林中則很少見。由此可以得出嶺南園林建筑的垂直性特征主要表現(xiàn)在以下幾個方面:1.景觀視點抬至高處;2.樓閣采用線性布置;3.樓閣使用偏向開放;4.嶺南園林善用高樓。接下來文章對嶺南建筑這種“垂直性”特征產生的原因進行了分析論證,得出以下幾個原因:1.用地面積制約;2.西方文化影響;3.商行園林影響;4.民居建筑影響。對嶺南園林建筑垂直性的研究的目的不僅僅在于探究歷史和過去,而是為了根植于嶺南建筑文化而對現(xiàn)代嶺南建筑設計進行指導。文章列舉了一個作者實際參與的項目——粵劇藝術博物館,并利用前文的研究內容對粵博館中的園林及建筑設計進行分析。在將“垂直性”應用于現(xiàn)代嶺南建筑的設計中時,會發(fā)現(xiàn)這種應用并不是刻意而為,而是對周邊環(huán)境的適應后自主產生的結果。這也從側面反映出這種建筑的“垂直性”是脫胎于嶺南獨特地域環(huán)境的園林特征。
[Abstract]:The "perpendicularity" referred to in this article refers to the form of vertical development generated by buildings of two stories or more in garden architecture. It can also be said that it is a trend to develop the garden architecture and its living space upwards. The reason why it is called "perpendicularity" is that there is a generally accepted view among the public that the western architecture develops vertically. In the garden works, the "perpendicularity" of the Lingnan garden has been mentioned by many scholars as a characteristic, but pavilions and pavilions have always been important elements in Chinese classical gardens. What is the difference between the verticality of Lingnan garden architecture and that of the middle tower in the north of the Yangtze river and the reasons for the difference are the key contents of this paper. Firstly, the vertical characteristics of the Lingnan garden and the northern garden of the Yangtze river are discussed in this paper. Analysis of the development process. The change trend of "perpendicularity" between the two is basically the same, that is to say, the difference of perpendicularity is not the difference between "using or not". The paper then analyzes and compares the expression forms of its "perpendicularity". Through the comparison, it is found that there are four differences in the expression of "perpendicularity" between the Lingnan garden and the northern garden of the Yangtze River: most of the views of the Lingnan garden are raised upstairs. Most of the gardens in the north and south of the Yangtze River are located on the ground, the buildings in the Lingnan gardens are linearly arranged by Lianyu, while the gardens in the north and the south of the Yangtze River are "dotted" buildings, the pavilions of the buildings in the south of the five ridges tend to be public, while the gardens in the north and the south of the Yangtze River are more private. Lingnan gardens like to use more than ten meters of tall buildings, The vertical characteristics of Lingnan landscape architecture are mainly shown in the following aspects: 1. The landscape view is raised to a high level 2. The pavilion adopts linear arrangement. 3. Pavilions use deviations. 4. Lingnan gardens make good use of tall buildings. Next, the article analyzes and demonstrates the causes of the "vertical" characteristics of Lingnan architecture. The following reasons are obtained: 1. The area of land is restricted. The influence of western culture is 3. The influence of commercial gardens and houses. The purpose of the research on the verticality of landscape architecture in Lingnan is not only to explore history and the past, It is to guide the modern Lingnan architectural design in order to be rooted in the Lingnan architectural culture. The article lists a project in which the author actually participates-the Museum of Cantonese Opera Art. And using the previous research content to analyze the garden and architectural design in Guangdong Museum. When applying "perpendicularity" to the design of modern Lingnan architecture, we will find that this application is not deliberate. It also reflects that the "perpendicularity" of this kind of architecture is the garden characteristic born out of the unique regional environment of Lingnan.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU986.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馮沛祖;廣州歷代私園史話(一)[J];廣東園林;2004年01期

2 馮沛祖;廣州歷代私園史話(二)[J];廣東園林;2004年02期

3 陸琦;;嶺南園林幾何形水庭[J];華南理工大學學報(社會科學版);2007年02期

4 劉賺;斯震;徐慧慧;;清代江南商人造園風格研究[J];華中建筑;2011年10期

5 吳慶洲;南漢遺跡藥洲園重建設計[J];華中建筑;1995年02期

6 梅靜;;“蘇城好,城里半園亭”——乾隆《姑蘇城圖》中園林用地規(guī)模及分布研究[J];中國建筑史論匯刊;2010年00期

7 石拓;程建軍;;漢代陶屋所反映的嶺南民居的變遷——試論“三間兩廊”的形成[J];建筑師;2013年03期

8 林源;;秦、漢復道、閣道與甬道建筑考[J];建筑師;2012年03期

9 張偉龍;;明清商品經濟發(fā)展背景下珠江三角洲城鎮(zhèn)城外街區(qū)的生長——以東莞縣城為中心[J];中國市場;2010年Z1期

10 王子今;馬振智;;秦漢“復道”考[J];文博;1984年03期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 李曉丹;17-18世紀中西建筑文化交流[D];天津大學;2004年

2 王瑜;外來建筑文化在嶺南的傳播及其影響研究[D];華南理工大學;2012年

相關碩士學位論文 前9條

1 陳哲舜;伍家園林[D];華南理工大學;2011年

2 孟憲軍;從嶺南園林看中外文化交流[D];暨南大學;2001年

3 戚宏;網師園的空間分析[D];同濟大學;2006年

4 彭丹;論清代廣州十三行商人對嶺南文化的貢獻[D];暨南大學;2006年

5 張偉龍;明清東莞城鎮(zhèn)地理初步研究[D];暨南大學;2010年

6 高媛;清代蘇州城市化進程中坊市風貌的演變及影響[D];蘇州大學;2013年

7 曹星渠;基于視覺感受的網師園中部景區(qū)空間量化分析及其啟示[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2013年

8 彭瑋卿;潘家園宅—清代廣州行商園林個案研究[D];華南理工大學;2009年

9 高劉濤;行商園林海山仙館研究[D];廣州大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1609413