麥克盧漢“媒介四定律”再探討:以電影和電視為例
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-03-29 06:08
【摘要】:正在傳播學(xué)界麥克盧漢一直是備受爭議的人物,即使在他如日中天的時(shí)候,對他的評價(jià)也是毀譽(yù)參半的!都~約先驅(qū)論壇報(bào)》曾把他譽(yù)為是"繼牛頓、達(dá)爾文、弗洛伊德、愛因斯坦和巴甫洛夫之后的最重要的思想家"。[1]但另一方面他的學(xué)說由于過分超前顯得離經(jīng)叛道,偏離實(shí)證主義研究方法和學(xué)術(shù)語言常規(guī),一直受到學(xué)院派正統(tǒng)人物的非議。
[Abstract]:McLuhan has always been a controversial figure in the communications world, and even when he was in the middle of the day, his assessment of him was mixed. The New York Herald Tribune once called him "after Newton, Darwin, Freud," the New York Herald Tribune called him "after Newton, Darwin, Freud," Einstein and Pavlov, the most important thinkers after. [1] on the other hand, his theory appeared to be out of line because of excessive advance, deviating from positivism research methods and academic linguistic norms. He has been criticized by the orthodox figures of the academies.
【作者單位】: 南京大學(xué)中國新文學(xué)研究中心;
【分類號】:J905
[Abstract]:McLuhan has always been a controversial figure in the communications world, and even when he was in the middle of the day, his assessment of him was mixed. The New York Herald Tribune once called him "after Newton, Darwin, Freud," the New York Herald Tribune called him "after Newton, Darwin, Freud," Einstein and Pavlov, the most important thinkers after. [1] on the other hand, his theory appeared to be out of line because of excessive advance, deviating from positivism research methods and academic linguistic norms. He has been criticized by the orthodox figures of the academies.
【作者單位】: 南京大學(xué)中國新文學(xué)研究中心;
【分類號】:J905
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 何道寬;媒介革命與學(xué)習(xí)革命——麥克盧漢媒介理論批評[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2000年05期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬煒;;麥克盧漢“媒介四定律”再探討:以電影和電視為例[J];中國圖書評論;2016年04期
2 李林容;李s,
本文編號:2449224
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/dianyingdianshilunwen/2449224.html
教材專著