【摘要】：正誰都沒想到,憋了一年的中國電影沒有火起來,而幾篇影評引發(fā)的公案卻火得一塌糊涂。先有影評人針對《長城》拋出了差評,樂視影業(yè)接招并過招,緊接著豆瓣電影和貓眼電影也卷入了風(fēng)浪之中,隨即幾家報紙的客戶端也加入進來,甚至還有種種傳聞。一時間,圍繞影評的爭論炸開了鍋。一、網(wǎng)生代影評人的一場集體暴動電影評論應(yīng)是一種自由的審美判斷行為,不能輕易俯就和屈從于市場,拿一句時髦的話來講,電影評論不應(yīng)做市場的奴隸。最近的這場影評風(fēng)波,歸根到底是因為
[Abstract]:No one expected that Chinese films, which had been suffocating for a year, had not caught fire, but several reviews had caused a complete uproar. A film critic threw a bad comment on the Great Wall, and Letv Pictures followed, followed by Douban and Cat Eye movies, followed by several newspaper clients, and even rumors. For a moment, the controversy over film criticism blew up. First, the film commentary of a collective riot should be a kind of free aesthetic judgment behavior, can not easily bow to the market and submit to the market, to take a fashionable word, film review should not be a slave to the market. In the final analysis, the latest controversy over film criticism was caused by
【作者單位】： 山西電影家協(xié)會;
【分類號】：J905

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 峻冰;;中國電影評論的現(xiàn)狀及未來[J];電影文學(xué);2006年11期

2 李建強;;需要什么樣的電影評論?[J];電影藝術(shù);2006年01期

3 胡泊;;當(dāng)下電影評論的迷失與建構(gòu)[J];新疆藝術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

4 王宜文;李t犵，

本文編號：2186702