【摘要】：正誰都沒想到,憋了一年的中國電影沒有火起來,而幾篇影評(píng)引發(fā)的公案卻火得一塌糊涂。先有影評(píng)人針對(duì)《長(zhǎng)城》拋出了差評(píng),樂視影業(yè)接招并過招,緊接著豆瓣電影和貓眼電影也卷入了風(fēng)浪之中,隨即幾家報(bào)紙的客戶端也加入進(jìn)來,甚至還有種種傳聞。一時(shí)間,圍繞影評(píng)的爭(zhēng)論炸開了鍋。一、網(wǎng)生代影評(píng)人的一場(chǎng)集體暴動(dòng)電影評(píng)論應(yīng)是一種自由的審美判斷行為,不能輕易俯就和屈從于市場(chǎng),拿一句時(shí)髦的話來講,電影評(píng)論不應(yīng)做市場(chǎng)的奴隸。最近的這場(chǎng)影評(píng)風(fēng)波,歸根到底是因?yàn)?br/>[Abstract]:No one expected that Chinese films, which had been suffocating for a year, had not caught fire, but several reviews had caused a complete uproar. A film critic threw a bad comment on the Great Wall, and Letv Pictures followed, followed by Douban and Cat Eye movies, followed by several newspaper clients, and even rumors. For a moment, the controversy over film criticism blew up. First, the film commentary of a collective riot should be a kind of free aesthetic judgment behavior, can not easily bow to the market and submit to the market, to take a fashionable word, film review should not be a slave to the market. In the final analysis, the latest controversy over film criticism was caused by
【作者單位】： 山西電影家協(xié)會(huì);
【分類號(hào)】：J905

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 峻冰;;中國電影評(píng)論的現(xiàn)狀及未來[J];電影文學(xué);2006年11期

2 李建強(qiáng);;需要什么樣的電影評(píng)論?[J];電影藝術(shù);2006年01期

3 胡泊;;當(dāng)下電影評(píng)論的迷失與建構(gòu)[J];新疆藝術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

4 王宜文;李t犵，

本文編號(hào)：2186702