【摘要】：通過對(duì)大陸2000年至2010年145篇比較教育學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文中隨機(jī)抽取的30篇論文的研究方法進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)存在以下問題:在態(tài)度上,研究方法意識(shí)淡薄;在認(rèn)識(shí)上,混淆了研究策略與研究方法;在論證中,偏重于二手資料,原始證據(jù)不足;在質(zhì)量上,研究結(jié)果缺乏檢測(cè)。針對(duì)比較教育學(xué)研究論文的實(shí)際情況,給出以下對(duì)策:增強(qiáng)整體方法論意識(shí),提高研究方法課程的有效性;確立原始資料優(yōu)先原則;運(yùn)用三角驗(yàn)證檢測(cè)研究結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:Based on the empirical analysis of 30 papers randomly selected from 145 doctoral dissertation in comparative education from 2000 to 2010 in mainland China, it is found that the following problems exist: the consciousness of research methods is weak in attitude, and the awareness of research methods is weak in cognition. It confuses the research strategy with the research method; in the argumentation, it pays more attention to the second-hand data, the original evidence is insufficient; in the quality, the research result lacks the examination. In view of the actual situation of comparative education research papers, the following countermeasures are put forward: enhancing the awareness of overall methodology, improving the effectiveness of the course of research methods, establishing the principle of primacy of raw data, and applying triangle verification to test the results of research.
【作者單位】： 東北師范大學(xué)國(guó)際與比較教育研究所;
【基金】：中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助(項(xiàng)目名稱:教師職前培養(yǎng)階段理論與實(shí)踐關(guān)系研究,項(xiàng)目編號(hào):10SSXP125)
【分類號(hào)】：G643

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙Z，

本文編號(hào)：2149077