【摘要】：通過對大陸2000年至2010年145篇比較教育學博士學位論文中隨機抽取的30篇論文的研究方法進行實證分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)存在以下問題:在態(tài)度上,研究方法意識淡薄;在認識上,混淆了研究策略與研究方法;在論證中,偏重于二手資料,原始證據(jù)不足;在質(zhì)量上,研究結(jié)果缺乏檢測。針對比較教育學研究論文的實際情況,給出以下對策:增強整體方法論意識,提高研究方法課程的有效性;確立原始資料優(yōu)先原則;運用三角驗證檢測研究結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:Based on the empirical analysis of 30 papers randomly selected from 145 doctoral dissertation in comparative education from 2000 to 2010 in mainland China, it is found that the following problems exist: the consciousness of research methods is weak in attitude, and the awareness of research methods is weak in cognition. It confuses the research strategy with the research method; in the argumentation, it pays more attention to the second-hand data, the original evidence is insufficient; in the quality, the research result lacks the examination. In view of the actual situation of comparative education research papers, the following countermeasures are put forward: enhancing the awareness of overall methodology, improving the effectiveness of the course of research methods, establishing the principle of primacy of raw data, and applying triangle verification to test the results of research.
【作者單位】： 東北師范大學國際與比較教育研究所;
【基金】：中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費專項資金資助(項目名稱:教師職前培養(yǎng)階段理論與實踐關(guān)系研究,項目編號:10SSXP125)
【分類號】：G643

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙Z，

本文編號：2149077