1.0Introduction介紹

1.1A brief introduction on the issues of ‘objectivity’“客觀(guān)性”問(wèn)題簡(jiǎn)介
大多數(shù)科學(xué)家都認(rèn)為“客觀(guān)性”的概念是研究自然界或社會(huì)中的“客觀(guān)性”的基本原理。隨著科技與經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，“客觀(guān)性”已成為更重要的認(rèn)知方式。有些科學(xué)家還認(rèn)為客觀(guān)性是西方文化史上最精彩的成就或成就。然而，，在最近幾年，在某些領(lǐng)域，人們一直在對(duì)客觀(guān)存在的客觀(guān)性進(jìn)行質(zhì)疑，而這一點(diǎn)被人們所指責(zé)，這是一個(gè)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)被強(qiáng)大的人所使用的目標(biāo)。雖然對(duì)客觀(guān)性的關(guān)注也在持續(xù)，但其關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)卻比以前少了一些�？陀^(guān)性在自然科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)中都很高，但也有人認(rèn)為客觀(guān)性在過(guò)去的社會(huì)學(xué)中并不重要。社會(huì)科學(xué)的批評(píng)家們提出了許多問(wèn)題。一些問(wèn)題將在本文中討論。
Most scientists have considered the concept of ‘objectivity’ as their fundamental principle in studying something on nature or on society. ‘Objectivity’ has become the more important than other knowing styles with the development of technology and economy. Some scientists also think of objectivity as the most wonderful success or accomplishment in the history of Western culture. However, in recent years, objectivity has been doubted in some areas, which has been accused of being used by the powerful people to reach certain goals for a long time. Although the attention on objectivity is also continuous, the focus on it has become a little less than before in the scientific feeds. The status of objectivity has been very high in both the natural and physical sciences, but some people also argue that objectivity is not as important in social science as in the past. There are many issues that have been put forward by the critics in the social sciences. Some of the issues will be discussed in the paper.   

1.2The meaning of ‘objectivity'

There are many various definition and ideas on objectivity. The word ‘objectivity’ is now used by people in some confusing ways. At present, the word meaning of objectivity consists several aspects, such as the metaphysical, moral and methodological respects, which has created some issues in itself (Charles, 1969). In order to offer some discussion on the issues of setting up objectivity in the social sciences, the essay will try to describe the true meaning of objectivity and the meaning of it to the people who employ it. This explanation is very important in preventing the readers from becoming lost in the peripatetic which means the Labyrinth of fraudulent ‘chimeras', mythical, positivist-like and foundationalist. This paper will help readers to avoid the wrong interpretations by expounding the illusive terms, which will also provide an insightful analysis on the history of it, such as the origin of the usage of ‘objectivity’, the ending of it and the present status of it. After clarifying the tight relationship between objectivity and subjectivity, the paper will analyze some necessary problems in setting up objectivity owing to the rejection of the value-free studies on society-culture and the usage of the concept of Paradigms (Christos, 1995). In the essay, the critical tradition and the consensual validation will also be employed as the methods to solve the issues of objectivity. Although objectivity tends to loss the battle in epistemology and the theory of standpoint displays one of the most intense arguments against objectivity. The concise overview on the meaning of objectivity discussions will offer a common consensus on the meaning of objectivity, which shows that the discussion is open as well and may be for the future.     

2.0The interpretation on the implication of ‘objectivity’

2.1The consensual definition of ‘objectivity’
2.3The dualism of objective-subjective 
3.0The views of Max Weber
3.1 The methods fail to offer objectivity to the study on social nature
3.2 The introduction of ‘relative objectivity’
3.3The achievement of objectivity in judgment
4.0The acquisition of objectivity 
4.1 The conceptualizations on objectivity of various theorists
4.2 The objectivity and the social liberation movement
5.0The adoption of the open ideological study
6.0Conclusion

7.0Reference

Charles, I., 1969, Objectivity: A Report on Social Science, Scientific Management, Pearson Prentice Hall, England.
Christos, E., 1995, “Introducing objectivity into social sciences”, International Journal of Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 46-52.
David, L., 1989, Study on objectivity, Mintel, London.
Davis, B., 1981, The Traditional Social Theories – Subjectivity and Objectivity, The Architectural Press, London.
Egan, D., 2002, “Reason and the Rationalization of Society”, International Journal of Contemporary Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 65-71.
Fitzsimmons, 2014, Objectivity: objectivity, subjectivity, relative objectivity McGraw-Hill International, NY.
Farrington, B., 2012, The interpretation on the implication of ‘objectivity’, Pearson, Oxford.
Girouard, M., 1984, Methodological study, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Gourvish, T.R., 1994, The ‘objectivity’ and ‘nature’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Greasley, A., 2013, Objectivity Researches, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Heizer, J., 2011, Objectivity and the issues on it, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Lockwood, A., 2012, Subjectivity versus objectivity, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Mansukhani, R., 1985, The Social Science Information Study, Euromonitor Publications, London.
Mince, U., 2010, Society development, Mintel, London.
Monckton, H.A., 1967, A History on relative objectivity, The Bodley Head, London.
Mass, 1970, The social development and sciences, Seven Dials Press, Welwyn Garden City. 
Ogards, J., 1972, Survey for the social scientists and the nature, HMSO, London.
Ojugo, C., 2010, Practice and feminist theories, Delmar, New York.
Polgase, P.K., 1988, The dualism of objective-subjective, Incontrol Publications, Ivybridge.
Pratten, J.D., 2003, “The changing nature of objectivity”, British Science Journal, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 252-62.
Panney, J.D., 2003, “Responding to demand: new types of objectivity”, Journal of science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 39-52.
Pattern, J.D., 2007, “The development of the modern social sciences”, International Journal of Contemporary science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 513-6.
Pantelidis, 2012, Objectivity in judgment, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
Shalver, M., 2012, Service Operations in massage and objectivity, Prentice Hall, England.
Steven, G., 1999, Work, The acquisition of objectivity, Routledge, London.
Timberg, M., 1999, Trends in objectivity and subjectivity, Mintel, London.
Van Weele, A.J., 2005,The objectivity and the social liberation, Thomson Learning, London.

本文編號(hào)：44474