1.  Introduction 介紹

米迦勒波特鉆石模型是一種重要的分析工具，可以應(yīng)用于國家競爭優(yōu)勢分析。本文首先討論了金剛石模型的背景和影響。其次，對五個國家的商業(yè)銀行業(yè)進行分析，在六大因素的基礎(chǔ)上，對鉆石模型進行分析。然后，本文可以解釋如何說服力是波特的鉆石模型在解釋的特點和性能的主要行業(yè)的業(yè)務(wù)系統(tǒng)。在論文的最后，，鉆石模型的三個主要弱點進行了討論。也有許多不同種類的鉆石模型，如雙鉆石模型，廣義雙鉆石模型和九因素模型。然而，由于這些很容易安裝在結(jié)構(gòu)中，它們將不包含在本文中。Michael Porter Diamond Model is an important analysis tool which can be applied to analyze the national competitive advantages. Firstly, in this paper, the background and influences of Diamond Model will be discussed. Secondly, the commercial banking industry in five countries will be analyzed on the basis of the six broad factors of Diamond Model. And then this paper can explain how convincing is Porter’s Diamond Model in explaining the characteristics and performance of business systems of the major industry. In the end of the paper, three major weaknesses of Diamond Model will be discussed. There are also many different kinds of Diamond Models such as Double Diamond Model, Generalized Double Diamond Model and the Nine-factor Model. However, as these are easily fitted into the structure, they will not be contained in this paper. 

2.  A background to the Diamond Model and its influence鉆石模型的背景及其影響

Diamond Model was developed by an American economist Michael E Porter. It can be applied to analyze the theory of why particular industries become competitive in particular locations (Linden, 2012). According to Diamond Model, the integral competitive advantage of a country can be formed when all of its industries and products participate in international competition. And the key of the acquirement of competitive advantage lies in the integration of four basic elements and two subsidiary elements. These six broad factors incorporated into the Diamond Model and has become a key tool for the analysis of competitiveness (Vivienne, 2011). The four basic elements are factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, firm strategy, structure and rivalry. The two subsidiary elements are government and chance events. Porter created the Diamond Model on the basis of the four basic conditions. He considered that the firm of a nation can achieve success when the four conditions of certain industries or departments are at their best. Diamond Model is also a system which is strengthened by mutual promotion. As a result, the degree of function of any condition depends on the status of other conditions. 

1.  Introduction 3
2.  A background to the Diamond Model and its influence 3
3.  Factor conditions 4
3.1 Factor conditions in China 5
3.2 Factor conditions in US 5
3.3 Factor conditions in German 5
3.4 Factor conditions in Japan 5
3.5 Factor conditions in UK 6
4.  Demand Conditions 6
4.1 Demand conditions in China 6
4.2 Demand conditions in US 6
4.3 Demand conditions in German 7
4.4 Demand conditions in Japan 7
4.5 Demand conditions in UK 7
5.  Related and Supporting Industries 7
5.1 Related and supporting industries in China 8
5.2 Related and supporting industries in US 8
5.3 Related and supporting industries in German 8
5.4 Related and supporting industries in Japan 8
5.5 Related and supporting industries in UK 8
6.  Firm Strategy, Structure and Rivalry 9
6.1 Firm strategy, structure and rivalry in China 9
6.2 Firm strategy, structure and rivalry in US 9
6.3 Firm strategy, structure and rivalry in German 9
6.4 Firm strategy, structure and rivalry in Japan 10
6.5 Firm strategy, structure and rivalry in UK 10
7.  Government 10
8.  Chance events 11
9.  Diamond Model and Characteristics of National Business System 11
10.  Diamond Model and Performance of National Business System 12
10.1 Performance of National Business System in China 12
10.2 Performance of National Business System in US 13
10.3 Performance of National Business System in German 13
10.4 Performance of National Business System in Japan 13
10.5 Performance of National Business System in UK 14
11.  The weakness of Diamond Model 14
12.  Conclusion 15
13.  Referemces 15

12.  Conclusion總結(jié)

According to the above analysis, it can be seen that Porter’s Diamond Model can explain the characteristics and performance of national business systems. After analyzing the factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, firm strategy, structure and rivalry, government and chance events of commercial banking industry in the two nations, their national business systems can be compared and analyzed in detail. Although Diamond Model has some weaknesses and limitations, it can be replenished and developed by other theories. Analyzing the national business systems is significant for the countries to improve their certain industries.

13.  Referemces文獻

1. Akram, A. (2012). “Financial Performance of Palestinian Commercial Banks.” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(3), p. 21.
2. Benton, E. (2007). Commercial banking: the management of risk. John Wiley & Sons. P. 583.
3. Bakan, I. (2012). “Competitiveness of the industries based on the Porter’s Diamond Model: An empirical study.” International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 11(3), p. 441.
4. Chien, T. (2011). “Industry-specific competitiveness of a nation and its consequence on overseas marketing performance: Measurement construction and empirical study that follows porter's diamond model.” Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences, 32(03), p.605.
5. Chang, S. (2012). “Assessing market power in the U.S. commercial banking industry under deregulation.” Economic Modelling, 29(5), pp. 1558-1565.
6. Dunning, J. (1993). “Internationalizing Porter's Diamond.” MIR: Management International Review, 33(2-1), pp. 7-15.
7. Daly, D. (1993). “Porter's diamond and exchange rates.” Management International Review, 33(2), p. 119.
8. Dona, S. (2013). “Commercial Banks and Value Relevance of Derivative Disclosures after SFAS 133: Evidence from the USA.” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 16(1), p. 1.
9. Edwards, T. (2004). “Multinationals, Reverse Diffusion and National Business Systems.” MIR: Management International Review, 44(1), pp. 49-79.
10. Fulton, L. (2014). “Commercial banks.” San Diego Business Journal, 35(52), p. 62.
11. Joseph, F. (1979). “Problem and failed institutions in the commercial banking industry.” Contemporary studies in economic and financial analysis, 52(4), p. 287.
12. Jonathan, W. (1991). Essays on the commercial banking industry. UMI Dissertations Publishing. P. 1.
13. Jasper, J. (2014). “From typology to taxonomy: a configurational analysis of national business systems and their explanatory power.” Organization studies, 35(5), pp. 671-702.
14. Kincaid, B. (2005). Competitive advantage of clusters within lesser developed countries of the South Pacific: An empirical case study extending the Porter diamond model. UMI Dissertations Publishing.
15. Li, N. (2014). “Research on Employee Training of State-owned Commercial Banks---Industrial and Commercial Bank of China as an Example.” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(6), p. 33.
16. Linden, V. (2012). “Diamond model of integrated business.” International Journal of Systems Science, pp. 29 – 54.
17. Lundvall, B. (1999). “National Business Systems and National Systems of Innovation.” International Studies of Management & Organization, 29(2), pp. 60-77.
18. Lee, T. (2013). “Does financial regulation affect the profit efficiency and risk of banks? evidence from China's commercial banks.” The North American journal of economics and finance, 26(08), pp. 705-724.
19. Morgan, G. (2007). “National business systems research: Progress and prospects.” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(2), pp. 127-145.
20. Marquis, C. (2010). “Acquisitions as exaptation: the legacy of founding institutions in the U.S. commercial banking industry.” Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), p. 1441.
21. Ozgen, E. (2011). “Porter's diamond model and opportunity recognition: a cognitive perspective.” Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 17(2), p. 61.
22. Peter, K. (2009). “Analysis of competitiveness of Hungarian whether sector with Porter’s Diamond Model.” Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9(03), pp. 399-403.
23. Pan, H. (2013). “An Evaluation of the Sustainable Development Leverof Listed Commercial Banks in China.” Research in World Economy, 4(23), p. 38.
24. Paula, M. (2010). “Diane D'Erasmo; EVP and Regional President, Commercial Banking, HSBC Bank USA.” US Banker, 120(10), p. 46.
25. Qian, X. (2015). “Officials on boards and the prudential behavior of banks: Evidence from China's city commercial banks.” China Economic Review, 32(51), pp. 84-96.
26. Rajneesh, N. (1993). “Technology, international business and Porter's "diamond": Synthesizing a dynamic competitive development model.” Management International Review, 33(2), p. 85.
27. Simona, V. (2013). “Commercial Banks Performance 2008-2012.” Business, Management and Education, 11(2), pp. 189-208.
28. Sven, H. (2002). “National business systems and industry-specific competitiveness.” Organization studies, 23(5), pp. 711-736.
29. Vivienne, W. (2011). “Competitiveness Model—A Double Diamond.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(3), p. 280.
30. Xie, Y. (2011). “The Engineering of China Commercial Bank Operational Risk Measurement.” Systems Engineering Procedia, 1(19), pp. 330-336.

本文編號：40539