【摘要】：在中國古代類書發(fā)展史中,隋代類書占據(jù)了承上啟下的關(guān)鍵位置。而《編珠》作為現(xiàn)存隋代類書,雖然有所殘缺,卻具有獨(dú)特的歷史作用。然而自清代高士奇發(fā)現(xiàn)《編珠》殘卷之后,以四庫館臣為首的學(xué)界人士多認(rèn)為此書為偽作。因此,清代輯佚家并未對(duì)之加以充分利用,以致使其文獻(xiàn)價(jià)值不僅沒有得到充分挖掘與合理定位,甚至有學(xué)者對(duì)之避之唯恐不及。本文以辨別是書的真?zhèn)螢榛c(diǎn),從而對(duì)其編纂體例、所引詩賦類作品以及地記作品進(jìn)行考證,在考證中又以其獨(dú)有的文獻(xiàn)價(jià)值來證明該書的真實(shí)性。本文分緒論和正文兩部分,緒論介紹了《編珠》殘卷概況,包括學(xué)界對(duì)于《編珠》的評(píng)價(jià)認(rèn)識(shí)和研究成果,以及《編珠》所具有的校勘與輯佚價(jià)值,即本文選題意義與可行性。正文是本文的主體部分,首先對(duì)以四庫館臣為代表的質(zhì)疑《編珠》作偽說進(jìn)行了反駁。從理論方面看,由于“古書近出”現(xiàn)象以及避諱問題的人為因素存在,使得《編珠》這樣一部古書具有存在的可能性,而且其中涉及到的不諱“廣”字問題有可能是避諱未盡或者后人回改所致。從書目著錄方面看,四庫館臣認(rèn)為《宋志》最先著錄《編珠》,這個(gè)說法是有問題的。因?yàn)榻?jīng)查證,其前已有書目對(duì)其進(jìn)行著錄,而且卷數(shù)問題存異。從《編珠》內(nèi)容看,其中有可輯佚的文字條目,且出處為異書。并且,《編珠》所涉及的《樂府解題》一書理應(yīng)先于唐吳兢《樂府解題》。所以,從內(nèi)容價(jià)值上可以肯定《編珠》在當(dāng)時(shí)是存在的。從流傳與版本看,《編珠》重見于世之時(shí),發(fā)現(xiàn)者并非高士奇一人,傳抄者亦非一家。然今可見者,乃為高氏刊本。從作者來看,杜公瞻曾仕隋著作郎,亦具備編書條件。因此,四庫館臣稱《編珠》一書作偽未免有所疏失。其次,對(duì)該書的編纂體例進(jìn)行了分析。從門類劃分看,《編珠》體現(xiàn)了“天、地、人”三位合一的思想觀念,而這種排列順序是和中國古代社會(huì)意識(shí)形態(tài)及其系統(tǒng)化的思維方式相關(guān)的。從編纂體例看,因其前類書殘缺不全,未見全貌,故而難以比較。而其后的類書,如《北堂書鈔》、《初學(xué)記》等對(duì)其“互見”、“事對(duì)”等引文之法皆有參考,這更加證明了它在類書史上的作用不可替代。最后,對(duì)《編珠》所引的詩賦類作品和地記作品分別進(jìn)行了考證,從中梳理出了《編珠》獨(dú)有的引文條目:詩類計(jì)1條,賦類計(jì)15條,地記佚文30種,以及前人失輯的文字若干。通過這樣的梳理,不僅對(duì)《編珠》的引文方式有所認(rèn)識(shí),而且進(jìn)一步從內(nèi)容方面的文獻(xiàn)價(jià)值肯定了該書的真實(shí)性。
[Abstract]:In the history of ancient Chinese books, Sui Dynasty books occupied the key position. As an extant Sui Dynasty book, Zanzhu has a unique historical function, although it is incomplete. However, since Gao Shiqi discovered the remnant volume of the Book of Pearl in Qing Dynasty, scholars headed by Siku Guanchen considered it a pseudo. Therefore, the authors of the Qing Dynasty did not make full use of it, so that the value of its literature was not fully excavated and rationally located, and some scholars even avoided it. Based on the identification of the authenticity of the book, this paper makes textual research on its compilation style, the cited works of poetry and Fu and the works of the earth record, and proves the authenticity of the book with its unique literature value in the textual research. This paper is divided into two parts: introduction and main text. The introduction introduces the general situation of "compiling beads", including the academic circles' evaluation and research results, as well as the value of collation and collection, that is, the significance and feasibility of selecting the topic of this paper. The text is the main part of this paper. Theoretically, due to the phenomenon of "ancient books coming out" and the existence of human factors to avoid the problem, it is possible for such an ancient book, such as "compiling Pearl", to exist. And involved in the word "wide" question is likely to be taboo or later reform. As far as bibliographic description is concerned, Siku officials think that Song Zhi was the first cataloguing, which is questionable. Because it has been verified, it has been catalogued before, and the volume of the problem is different. From the content of the Pearl, there are some text items which can be collected, and the source is a different book. Besides, Yuefu's problem solving is supposed to precede Tang Wu's. Therefore, from the value of the content can be sure that the "Zanzhu" was there at that time. From the point of view of the spread and the edition, the discoverer is not a gauskey, nor is it a family. However, the present can be seen, is for the publication of the Gao. From the author's point of view, du Gongzhan had Sui works Lang, also has the compilation conditions. As a result, Siku officials said that the book was false. Secondly, the compilation style of the book is analyzed. According to the classification of categories, "compiling beads" embodies the idea of "heaven, earth and man", which is related to the ideology of ancient Chinese society and its systematic mode of thinking. From the compilation style, it is difficult to compare because its former books are incomplete and incomplete. However, the later class books, such as Beitang Book Notes, beginners' Notes, and so on, have references to the citations such as "seeing each other" and "matter to right", which proves that their role in the history of the class books cannot be replaced. Finally, the author makes a textual research on the poems and poems cited in the Book of Pearl, and finds out the unique citation entries of the Book of Pearl: 1 poem, 15 Fu, 30 lost works. As well as the predecessors lost the text of a number of. Through this sort of combing, not only the citation mode of "compiling Pearl" is recognized, but also the authenticity of the book is confirmed by the literature value of the content.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G256

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊娜;新舊類書的比較[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

2 楊賽;;《文章緣起》的真?zhèn)螁栴}[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

3 吳夏平;;論類書與唐代“j兝ㄌ迨盵J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

4 夏南強(qiáng);類書分類體系的發(fā)展演變[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

5 賀巷超;;淺議類書產(chǎn)生和存在的條件[J];圖書館理論與實(shí)踐;1993年04期

6 韓建立;;《藝文類聚》類目編排新探[J];圖書館理論與實(shí)踐;2009年07期

7 周生杰;;《太平御覽》目錄學(xué)思想初探[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期

8 喻意志;;唐宋樂府解題類典籍考辨[J];音樂研究;2011年02期

9 吳承學(xué);李曉紅;;任f 《文章緣起》考論[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2007年04期

10 劉正平;隋唐五代韻書、類書、總集的編纂與文化建設(shè)[J];西北成人教育學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鮑遠(yuǎn)航;《水經(jīng)注》文獻(xiàn)學(xué)文學(xué)研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2004年

2 韓建立;《藝文類聚》編纂研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王淑靜;馮琦與《經(jīng)濟(jì)類編》[D];山東師范大學(xué);2005年

2 徐亮;《四庫全書》西北文獻(xiàn)研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2424751