【摘要】：著錄的《離騷圖》一書,有蕭云從原繪本與乾隆年間補(bǔ)繪本的差異,致使纂修者、纂修時(shí)間以及書名、卷數(shù)也都有差異,體現(xiàn)了四庫全書纂修的階段性特點(diǎn)。文淵閣《四庫全書》本與文津閣《四庫全書》本《曹子建集》,據(jù)以繕錄的不是同一個(gè)本子;文津閣本與明活字本相同處甚多,但也并不是簡單的照錄;今人《四庫提要辨證》用明活字本來評(píng)說文淵閣本的錯(cuò)誤,并不合適。宋晁補(bǔ)之《雞肋集》提要的模糊說法對(duì)后世造成了誤解。
[Abstract]:There is the difference between the original picture book of Xiao Yun and the supplementary picture book of Qianlong period, which leads to the difference of the editor, the compilation time, the title of the book and the number of volumes, which embodies the stage characteristic of the compilation of Siku book. The text of Wen Yuan Pavilion and Wen Jin GE < Si Kuquan] is not the same book on the basis of the collection of Cao Zijian, the text of Wenjin Pavilion is much the same as the movable text of Ming Dynasty, but it is not a simple record. It is not appropriate to use Ming movable word to comment on the mistakes of Wen Yuan Pavilion. Song Chao Buzhi "Ji Li Ji" the fuzzy statement of later generations caused misunderstanding.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：G256
，

本文編號(hào)：2279837