【摘要】：[目的 /意義]對(duì)不同學(xué)術(shù)社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)中不同學(xué)科用戶(hù)的文獻(xiàn)閱讀差異進(jìn)行分析,以了解在不同學(xué)術(shù)社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的學(xué)科分布情況,掌握在不同學(xué)術(shù)社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的學(xué)科研究熱點(diǎn)。[方法 /過(guò)程]通過(guò)Altmetric.com獲取24個(gè)學(xué)科的4 800篇熱點(diǎn)文獻(xiàn),利用爬蟲(chóng)采集這些文獻(xiàn)在Mendeley和Research Gate的被閱讀次數(shù),再對(duì)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行內(nèi)容分析,得到關(guān)鍵詞,最后對(duì)比分析不同學(xué)術(shù)社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)中文獻(xiàn)閱讀差異以及學(xué)科關(guān)注熱點(diǎn)的一致性。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]不同學(xué)科的讀者身份、讀者所屬領(lǐng)域具有顯著差異,Research Gate中的文獻(xiàn)閱讀次數(shù)普遍高于Mendeley,且社會(huì)科學(xué)等軟學(xué)科的文獻(xiàn)閱讀相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)更為明顯,而物理學(xué)等硬學(xué)科的文獻(xiàn)閱讀相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)較低。Mendeley和Research Gate在地球與地理科學(xué)、化學(xué)和環(huán)境科學(xué)等學(xué)科中的關(guān)注熱點(diǎn)具有較高的一致性,而物理學(xué)等部分學(xué)科中的關(guān)注熱點(diǎn)表現(xiàn)出較低的一致性。
[Abstract]:Objective / significance: to analyze the literature reading differences of users in different academic social networks in order to understand the distribution of subjects in different academic social networks and to grasp the research hot spots in different academic social networks. [methods / process] 4,800 hot papers of 24 subjects were obtained by Altmetric.com, and the reading times of these papers in Mendeley and Research Gate were collected by using reptiles, and then the contents of the literatures were analyzed and the keywords were obtained. Finally, the differences of literature reading and the consistency of academic hot spots in different academic social networks are compared and analyzed. [results / conclusion] there are significant differences in readers' identity in different disciplines. The reading times of literature in Gate are generally higher than those in Mendeley.And the relative advantages of literature reading in soft subjects such as social sciences are more obvious. However, the relative advantages of literature reading in physics and other hard subjects are relatively low. Mendeley and Research Gate have a high consistency in the hot spots of interest in earth and geography, chemistry and environmental sciences, etc. However, the focus of attention in some disciplines such as physics shows low consistency.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)信息資源研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目“我國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)信息化推進(jìn)與保障機(jī)制研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):15JJD870001) 武漢大學(xué)“351人才計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目”研究成果之一
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G252.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張希平;;關(guān)于圖書(shū)館與社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)的設(shè)想[J];普洱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

2 李金波;;社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)在高校圖書(shū)館服務(wù)中的應(yīng)用研究[J];圖書(shū)館論壇;2012年06期

3 姚向陽(yáng);江蓉星;許霞;;社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)的用戶(hù)行為和發(fā)展特點(diǎn)對(duì)圖書(shū)館與讀者互動(dòng)的啟示[J];四川圖書(shū)館學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

4 張?jiān)掠?王e，

本文編號(hào)：2174002