本文選題：PubMed數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) + 撤銷(xiāo)論文��； 參考：《中國(guó)科技期刊研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：【目的】分析PubMed數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)中因不同原因撤銷(xiāo)的我國(guó)論文的文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)特征以及凈化效果�！痉椒ā渴占�2005—2014年P(guān)ubMed因不同原因而撤銷(xiāo)的我國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)論文的地區(qū)、期刊分布情況;分析撤銷(xiāo)論文數(shù)量隨時(shí)間的變化趨勢(shì)以及撤銷(xiāo)論文的撤銷(xiāo)時(shí)滯和凈化效果�！窘Y(jié)果】共檢索到撤銷(xiāo)的中國(guó)論文370篇,撤銷(xiāo)原因中,剽竊類(lèi)型最多,錯(cuò)誤次之,其次為重復(fù)發(fā)表、學(xué)術(shù)道德問(wèn)題。因錯(cuò)誤和學(xué)術(shù)不端撤銷(xiāo)的論文數(shù)量逐年增長(zhǎng)。湖北、上海、北京、山東、江蘇、浙江、廣東、臺(tái)灣、黑龍江、陜西、重慶顯示度比較高。期刊的分布比較分散,表現(xiàn)規(guī)律不明顯。各種類(lèi)型凈化時(shí)間成本均衡。除其他類(lèi)型外,各種類(lèi)型論文撤銷(xiāo)后學(xué)術(shù)凈化效果顯著�！窘Y(jié)論】揭示了我國(guó)生物醫(yī)學(xué)類(lèi)論文撤銷(xiāo)的主要原因及不同原因撤銷(xiāo)論文的凈化效果。建議編輯、期刊、數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)出版商應(yīng)當(dāng)規(guī)范和完善撤銷(xiāo)聲明和撤銷(xiāo)原因的標(biāo)注,避免引用撤銷(xiāo)后的論文,共同凈化學(xué)術(shù)環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:[objective] to analyze the bibliometrics characteristics and purifying effect of Chinese papers withdrawn for different reasons in PubMed database. [methods] to collect the distribution of journals in PubMed from 2005 to 2014. This paper analyzes the trend of the number of revocation papers over time, and the time lag and purification effect of revocation papers. [results] 370 Chinese papers were retrieved. Among the reasons for revocation, plagiarism is the most, error is the second, and repeat publication is the second. The question of academic morality The number of papers cancelled due to errors and academic misconduct has increased year by year. Hubei, Shanghai, Beijing, Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Taiwan, Heilongjiang, Shaanxi, Chongqing show a high degree. The distribution of periodicals is scattered, and the law of expression is not obvious. All types of purification time cost equilibrium. Among other types, the academic purification effect of various kinds of papers is remarkable. [conclusion] the main reasons of revocation of biomedical papers in China and the purifying effect of different reasons are revealed. It is suggested that editors, journal publishers and database publishers should standardize and improve the labeling of revocation statements and reasons for revocation, avoid quoting papers after revocation, and jointly purify the academic environment.
【作者單位】： 新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學(xué)院期刊社《眼科新進(jìn)展》編輯部;河南省科技期刊研究中心;
【基金】：新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學(xué)院科技期刊與科研績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究培育基地項(xiàng)目
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G353.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王金泉;;基于PubMed數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)的高血壓護(hù)理研究熱點(diǎn)分析[J];山西醫(yī)藥雜志(下半月刊);2013年06期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2116391