發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-04 10:09

【摘要】：紫花苜蓿是一種多年生的豆科牧草,具有較高的營(yíng)養(yǎng)價(jià)值,但土壤的鹽漬化嚴(yán)重制約了紫花苜蓿的產(chǎn)量。采用常規(guī)育種方法對(duì)它們進(jìn)行種質(zhì)改良不僅周期長(zhǎng)而且成效低。隨著現(xiàn)代分子生物學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,利用基因工程技術(shù)改良紫花苜蓿耐鹽性成為紫花苜蓿改良育種的主要方式。本文在高效的紫花苜蓿再生體系的基礎(chǔ)上,以子葉節(jié)為外植體,通過(guò)農(nóng)桿菌介導(dǎo)法將擬南芥基因SOS1-SOS2-SOS3導(dǎo)入到紫花苜�！鞍枌稹敝�,經(jīng)篩選獲得了轉(zhuǎn)基因陽(yáng)性植株,并對(duì)其進(jìn)行抗逆性鑒定。主要研究結(jié)果如下:(1)經(jīng)PCR檢測(cè)、除草劑抗性篩選和RT-PCR鑒定,證明外源基因已整合到紫花苜蓿的基因組中,共獲得12株轉(zhuǎn)基因陽(yáng)性植株,陽(yáng)性率為80%。(2)以轉(zhuǎn)基因和野生型植株為材料進(jìn)行盆栽耐鹽性鑒定,分別用100、200和300 mmol/L的NaCl溶液處理植株,脅迫6 d后,進(jìn)行耐鹽指標(biāo)的測(cè)定,結(jié)果如下:轉(zhuǎn)基因和野生型植株之間的表型存在明顯差異,即野生型植株葉片明顯變黃,并且出現(xiàn)萎蔫和枯萎跡象。在不同鹽濃度處理下,所有植株的株高均有所增長(zhǎng),但在100和200 mmol/L的NaCl處理下,轉(zhuǎn)基因植株的長(zhǎng)勢(shì)顯著高于野生型植株。測(cè)定鹽脅迫下各植株的生理生化指標(biāo)。結(jié)果表明:隨著處理時(shí)間的增加,所有植株的葉綠素含量均呈先上升后下降的趨勢(shì),且野生型植株葉綠素含量均低于轉(zhuǎn)基因植株;在100和200 mmol/L的NaCl處理下,轉(zhuǎn)基因植株的細(xì)胞膜透性、SOD活性和Pro含量的增加量均小于野生型植株,而POD、CAT活性和可溶性糖含量的增加量均大于野生型;各植株中MDA含量均下降,且野生型植株下降的更為明顯。通過(guò)測(cè)定處理前后轉(zhuǎn)基因和野生型植株根系中的Na+和K+含量。結(jié)果表明:處理后,轉(zhuǎn)基因植株根系中Na+的積累比野生型植株少,而K+的吸收多于野生型植株。說(shuō)明:當(dāng)在100和200 mmol/L的NaCl處理下,轉(zhuǎn)基因植株發(fā)揮SOS途徑的作用,促進(jìn)Na+外排,減輕了 Na+離子對(duì)植物細(xì)胞的毒害,提高了紫花苜蓿的耐鹽性。而在300 mmol/L的NaCl處理下,轉(zhuǎn)基因和野生型植株的耐鹽指標(biāo)差異不明顯。(3)以轉(zhuǎn)基因和野生型植株為材料進(jìn)行水培抗旱性鑒定。分別用5%、10%和20%的PEG 6000處理植株,脅迫5 d后,進(jìn)行抗旱指標(biāo)的測(cè)定。結(jié)果如下:在5%和10%PEG濃度脅迫下,各植株的SOD、POD活性和葉綠素、可溶性糖含量均呈現(xiàn)下降趨勢(shì),且野生型植株下降更為明顯;各植株的CAT活性均增加,且轉(zhuǎn)基因植株的CAT活性增加顯著;轉(zhuǎn)基因植株中的MDA和Pro的增加量均低于野生型植株。說(shuō)明:在5%和10%的PEG脅迫下,轉(zhuǎn)基因植株的生理指標(biāo)變化明顯,抗旱性有所提高,而在20%PEG脅迫下,二者差異不大。
[Abstract]:Alfalfa is a perennial leguminous forage with high nutritional value, but soil salinization seriously restricts the yield of alfalfa. Using conventional breeding methods to improve their germplasm not only has a long period but also has low effectiveness. With the development of modern molecular biology technology, using genetic engineering technology to improve alfalfa salt tolerance has become the main way of alfalfa breeding. On the basis of efficient regeneration system of alfalfa and cotyledon node as explant, Arabidopsis thaliana gene SOS1-SOS2-SOS3 was introduced into Algonquin of alfalfa by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and transgenic positive plants were obtained by screening. And its resistance to stress was identified. The main results are as follows: (1) after PCR detection, herbicide resistance screening and RT-PCR identification, it was proved that the exogenous gene had been integrated into the genome of alfalfa, and 12 transgenic plants were obtained. The positive rate was 80. (2) transgenic and wild-type plants were used to identify the salt tolerance of potted plants. The plants were treated with 100200 and 300 mmol/L NaCl solution respectively. After 6 days of stress, the salt tolerance indexes were determined. The results were as follows: the phenotypes of transgenic and wild-type plants were significantly different, that is, the leaves of wild-type plants turned yellow, and showed signs of wilting and wilting. Under different salt concentrations, the plant height of all plants increased, but the growth of transgenic plants was significantly higher than that of wild-type plants under 100 and 200 mmol/L NaCl treatment. Physiological and biochemical indexes of plants under salt stress were measured. The results showed that the chlorophyll content of all plants increased first and then decreased with the increase of treatment time, and the chlorophyll content of wild type plants was lower than that of transgenic plants, and under 100 and 200 mmol/L NaCl treatment, the chlorophyll content of wild type plants was lower than that of transgenic plants. Sod activity and Pro content of cell membrane permeability of transgenic plants were lower than those of wild type plants, but the increase of POD,CAT activity and soluble sugar content were higher than that of wild type, and MDA content in all plants decreased. The wild-type plants decreased more obviously. The contents of Na and K in the roots of transgenic and wild type plants were determined before and after treatment. The results showed that the accumulation of Na in the roots of transgenic plants was less than that of wild-type plants, and the absorption of K was more than that of wild-type plants. The results showed that when treated with 100 and 200 mmol/L NaCl, the transgenic plants played the role of SOS pathway, promoted Na efflux, alleviated the toxicity of Na ion to plant cells, and improved the salt tolerance of alfalfa. However, there was no significant difference in salt tolerance between transgenic and wild type plants treated with 300 mmol/L NaCl. (3) the drought resistance of transgenic and wild type plants was identified by hydroponics. The plants were treated with 10% and 20% PEG 6000, respectively, and drought resistance indexes were determined after 5 days of stress. The results were as follows: under 5% and 10%PEG concentration stress, the SOD,POD activity, chlorophyll, soluble sugar content of each plant showed a downward trend, and the wild-type plant decreased more obviously, and the CAT activity of each plant increased. The CAT activity of transgenic plants increased significantly, and the increase of MDA and Pro in transgenic plants was lower than that in wild-type plants. The results showed that under the stress of 5% and 10% of PEG, the physiological indexes of transgenic plants were obviously changed, and the drought resistance of transgenic plants was improved, but under 20%PEG stress, the difference between them was not significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧夏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：S541.9;Q943.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金太成;孟大偉;王悅;楊麗萍;;利用AH1基因的遺傳轉(zhuǎn)化改良紫花苜蓿耐鹽性[J];分子植物育種;2016年07期

2 趙宣;韓霽昌;王歡元;張揚(yáng);;鹽漬土改良技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2016年08期

3 胡興旺;金杭霞;朱丹華;;植物抗旱耐鹽機(jī)理的研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2015年24期

4 薛曉鋒;周巖;陳亞?wèn)|;陶燁;陳燕繪;;超聲波輔助農(nóng)桿菌介導(dǎo)SeNHX1基因轉(zhuǎn)化紫花苜蓿的研究[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2014年18期

5 馬風(fēng)勇;石曉霞;許興;李占清;朱永興;;擬南芥SOS基因家族與植物耐鹽性研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2013年21期

6 劉瑩;才華;劉晶;柏錫;紀(jì)巍;朱延明;;GsCRCK基因轉(zhuǎn)化農(nóng)菁1號(hào)苜蓿及其耐鹽性分析[J];草業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

7 馬玉花;;植物耐鹽分子機(jī)理研究進(jìn)展[J];湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2013年02期

8 張立全;牛一丁;郝金鳳;哈斯阿古拉;;通過(guò)花粉管通道法導(dǎo)入紅樹(shù)總DNA獲得耐鹽紫花苜蓿T_0代植株及其RAPD驗(yàn)證[J];草業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

9 郭慧琴;任衛(wèi)波;徐柱;王蜜;陳立波;;紫花苜蓿轉(zhuǎn)基因研究進(jìn)展[J];核農(nóng)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

10 牛一丁;霍朝霞;哈斯阿古拉;張立全;扈廷茂;;紫花苜�；ǚ酃芡ǖ婪ㄞD(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)初探[J];中國(guó)草地學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 包愛(ài)科;王鎖民;;超表達(dá)植物H+-PPase基因提高紫花苜蓿的抗逆性[A];第三屆中國(guó)苜蓿發(fā)展大會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張立全;利用轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)創(chuàng)建紫花苜蓿耐鹽新種質(zhì)的研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

2 金太成;大豆DREB基因GmDREB1改良紫花苜蓿耐鹽性的研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年

3 李進(jìn)軍;紫花苜蓿轉(zhuǎn)基因體系的建立及轉(zhuǎn)檸檬酸合酶基因?qū)ζ浼?xì)胞耐鋁性的影響[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年

4 呂素蓮;轉(zhuǎn)betA和TsVP基因提高棉花耐鹽、抗旱性的研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李海青;轉(zhuǎn)堿篷和鹽角草總DNA的耐鹽紫花苜蓿的選育[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2015年

2 苗璐;農(nóng)桿菌介導(dǎo)抗菌肽Rev4基因的紫花苜蓿遺傳轉(zhuǎn)化體系的建立[D];吉林師范大學(xué);2015年

3 王紅俊;9種冷季型草坪草耐鹽性、抗旱性及坪用性研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

4 李會(huì)文;苜蓿耐鹽多基因遺傳轉(zhuǎn)化研究[D];寧夏大學(xué);2013年

5 王超;農(nóng)桿菌介導(dǎo)的堿蓬液泡膜H~+-ATPases基因轉(zhuǎn)化苜蓿的研究[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

6 陳靜;農(nóng)桿菌介導(dǎo)小麥鐵蛋白基因轉(zhuǎn)化煙草及抗逆性研究[D];河南工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

7 毛秀紅;苜蓿耐鹽的基因工程改良研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

8 霍朝霞;擬南芥DREB1A基因轉(zhuǎn)化紫花苜蓿的研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2008年

9 肖荷霞;苜蓿轉(zhuǎn)化再生體系的建立及LEA_3基因研究[D];河北大學(xué);2005年

10 高大玉;Mant基因?qū)朊藁ɑ蚪M的研究[D];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2221772