株行距配置對(duì)日光溫室黃瓜光合作用及產(chǎn)量的影響
本文選題:株行距配置 切入點(diǎn):光合作用 出處:《山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:為了實(shí)現(xiàn)日光溫室黃瓜(Cucumis sativus L.)生產(chǎn)中農(nóng)機(jī)與農(nóng)藝的結(jié)合,減輕勞動(dòng)強(qiáng)度,提高勞動(dòng)效率,本文以‘津綠30’為試材,設(shè)置株行距分別為22 cm×50 cm,120 cm(T1);26 cm×50 cm,120 cm(T2);30 cm×50 cm,120 cm(T3)3個(gè)處理,以當(dāng)前常規(guī)行株距配置31 cm×50 cm,70 cm為對(duì)照(CK),研究株行距配置對(duì)黃瓜光合作用、碳代謝、生長(zhǎng)量、產(chǎn)量及品質(zhì)的影響。主要結(jié)果如下:1.行距相同時(shí),隨著株距的減小和種植密度的增加,植株各層次葉片的葉面積和光量子通量密度(PFD)逐漸增加。單位土地面積上T2和T3的葉面積多明顯小于CK,而T1與CK差異不顯著。2.各時(shí)期光合速率(Pn)均以第4葉最高,第1葉和8葉其次,第12葉最低。不同株行距配置黃瓜葉片的Pn日變化規(guī)律基本相同,均呈單峰曲線型,高峰出現(xiàn)在13:00左右。各處理日光溫室黃瓜的光飽和點(diǎn)差異不大,而T3的光補(bǔ)償點(diǎn)明顯大于CK。與CK相比,T1的表觀量子效率(AQY)較大,而T2、T3變化較小。3.隨著單位面積株數(shù)的減少,黃瓜功能葉片的核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶(RuBPCase)和Rubisco活性酶(RCA)活性趨于增大;加大行距可促進(jìn)黃瓜葉片有機(jī)碳的轉(zhuǎn)化和糖的積累。4.T1、T2、T3日光溫室黃瓜的發(fā)病率和病情指數(shù)均顯著低于CK,說(shuō)明增加大行距可明顯減輕病害發(fā)生。黃瓜單位面積土地上的葉面積和干物質(zhì)量隨著種植密度的減小而減小,與CK相比,T2和T3的葉/瓜較小,而T1變化不大。T1處理的黃瓜產(chǎn)量與CK差異不顯著,而T2和T3的明顯低于CK。5.隨著單位面積株數(shù)的減少,黃瓜果實(shí)中的可溶性糖、蛋白、氨基酸和Vc含量多趨于增加,T1與CK差異不大?梢(jiàn),在單位面積株數(shù)相同條件下,增加行距減小株距對(duì)黃瓜產(chǎn)量和品質(zhì)影響不大,可在產(chǎn)量和品質(zhì)不受影響的前提下實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)械化操作。
[Abstract]:In order to realize Cucumis sativus L.The combination of agricultural machinery and agronomy in production can lighten the labor intensity and improve the labor efficiency. In this paper, 'Jinlu 30' was used as the test material, and the plant row spacing was 22 cm 脳 50 cm / kg 120 cm ~ (-1) and 26 cm 脳 50 cm ~ (-1) ~ (26 cm 脳 50 cm ~ (-1) ~ 120 cm ~ (-1) C ~ (2)) ~ (30 cm 脳 50 cm ~ (-1) ~ (120) cm ~ (T3)), respectively.The effects of row spacing on photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, growth, yield and quality of cucumber were studied.The main results are as follows: 1.With the decrease of plant spacing and the increase of plant density, the leaf area and light quantum flux density (PFDs) of leaves at all levels of the plant increased with the same row spacing.The leaf area of T2 and T3 on unit land area was much smaller than that of CK, but there was no significant difference between T1 and CK.The photosynthetic rate (PN) was the highest in the 4th leaf, followed by the first leaf and the eighth leaf, and the lowest in the 12th leaf.The rule of PN diurnal variation of cucumber leaves with different plant spacing was basically the same, and all of them showed a single peak curve, and the peak appeared at about 13:00.The light saturation point of cucumber in solar greenhouse was not different, but the light compensation point of T3 was significantly higher than that of CK.Compared with CK, the apparent quantum efficiency of T 1 is higher than that of CK, while the change of T 2 T 3 is smaller. 3.With the decrease of the number of plants per unit area, the activities of rubus carboxylase (RuBPC) and Rubisco activity enzyme (rca) in cucumber functional leaves tended to increase.Increasing row spacing could promote the conversion of organic carbon in cucumber leaves and the accumulation of sugar. 4. The incidence and disease index of cucumber in solar greenhouse were significantly lower than that in CK.The leaf area and dry matter mass of cucumber per unit area decreased with the decrease of planting density, and the leaf / melon ratio of T _ 2 and T _ 3 was smaller than that of CK, while the yield of cucumber treated with T1 was not significantly different from CK, but the yield of T _ 2 and T _ 3 was significantly lower than CK, and that of T _ 2 and T _ 3 was significantly lower than that of CK.With the decrease of plant number per unit area, the contents of soluble sugar, protein, amino acid and VC in cucumber fruit tended to increase.Therefore, under the same number of plants per unit area, increasing row spacing and decreasing plant spacing had little effect on yield and quality of cucumber, and mechanized operation could be realized on the premise that yield and quality were not affected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:S626;S642.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉哲;;阜新地區(qū)花生全程機(jī)械化生產(chǎn)優(yōu)勢(shì)分析[J];農(nóng)機(jī)使用與維修;2016年04期
2 張景平;;水稻全程機(jī)械化操作技術(shù)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程技術(shù);2016年08期
3 羅錫文;廖娟;胡煉;臧英;周志艷;;提高農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械化水平促進(jìn)農(nóng)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期
4 盧秉福;韓衛(wèi)平;朱明;;農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械化發(fā)展水平評(píng)價(jià)方法比較[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年16期
5 李小朋;王術(shù);黃元財(cái);賈寶艷;王巖;曾群云;;株行距配置對(duì)齊穗期粳稻冠層結(jié)構(gòu)及產(chǎn)量的影響[J];應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2015年11期
6 朱金城;陶洪斌;盛耀輝;高英波;楊利華;張文英;王璞;;品種、空間布局及種植密度對(duì)春玉米冠層結(jié)構(gòu)、物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)及產(chǎn)量的影響[J];玉米科學(xué);2015年02期
7 王欣悅;劉愛(ài)玉;鄒茜;向鳳玲;歐陽(yáng)燕莎;;栽培措施對(duì)棉花短季直播群體冠層結(jié)構(gòu)和光合作用的影響[J];作物研究;2015年02期
8 王玉梅;劉子凡;黃潔;陳太就;;株行距配置對(duì)木薯生物量和產(chǎn)量性狀的影響[J];南方農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2014年08期
9 張東升;韓碩;王旗;劉軍;張偉;張立禎;劉建國(guó);;棗棉間作條件下棉花密度對(duì)棉花光合特性及產(chǎn)量影響[J];棉花學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期
10 王崢;宋洪衛(wèi);張炳軍;宋文博;李冰;孫明磊;景文東;賀國(guó)強(qiáng);;種植密度對(duì)烤煙葉片光合特性·葉綠素?zé)晒馓匦约爱a(chǎn)質(zhì)量的影響[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2014年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 毛麗麗;種植密度和縮節(jié)安對(duì)麥套棉花生長(zhǎng)和產(chǎn)量形成的研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年
2 錢(qián)婷婷;日光溫室黃瓜群體冠層結(jié)構(gòu)特征分析與參數(shù)化模型構(gòu)建[D];上海交通大學(xué);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 李小朋;株行距配置對(duì)不同穗型水稻冠層結(jié)構(gòu)、抗倒性及產(chǎn)量的影響[D];沈陽(yáng)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2016年
2 李建峰;機(jī)采模式下株行距配置對(duì)棉花冠層特征及成鈴特性的影響[D];石河子大學(xué);2016年
3 高仁才;田間配置對(duì)玉豆系統(tǒng)光環(huán)境、光能利用和產(chǎn)量的影響研究[D];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年
4 謝飛;種植密度和間作時(shí)期對(duì)甜瓜/向日葵間作系統(tǒng)光能利用效率的影響[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
5 蘭宏亮;東北春玉米密度對(duì)根系質(zhì)量的影響與化學(xué)調(diào)控機(jī)理研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2011年
6 王會(huì)民;栽植密度對(duì)不同株型水稻光能利用影響的研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2010年
7 楊穎穎;不同肥料處理對(duì)小麥冠層結(jié)構(gòu)影響及形態(tài)模擬模型構(gòu)建[D];河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2008年
8 杜震宇;不同株行距配置對(duì)水稻生長(zhǎng)發(fā)育的影響[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號(hào):1710090
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/1710090.html