20世紀(jì)80年代,認(rèn)知語言學(xué)興起并獲得廣泛關(guān)注。與之前的結(jié)構(gòu)主義語言學(xué),功能語言學(xué)和轉(zhuǎn)換生成語法相比,認(rèn)知語言學(xué)最大的特點(diǎn)在于其對于語言意義本身的研究。認(rèn)知語言學(xué)范疇之下的隱喻理論,轉(zhuǎn)喻理論,意象圖示,以及原型范疇等理論在語義研究領(lǐng)域都具有極強(qiáng)解釋力。多義研究聚焦詞語意義的研究。因此,多義研究與認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的研究具有異曲同工之妙。這樣的相似性為認(rèn)知語言學(xué)研究與多義研究的結(jié)合提供了基礎(chǔ)。本文選取三個空間介詞in,on和at作為研究對象,首先通過研究分析獲取了三個介詞的原型空間意義,并畫出三個介詞各自在空間域上的意象圖示;然后,以隱喻理論作為理論指導(dǎo),分別分析它們在時間域,方式域,狀態(tài)域,社會關(guān)系域以及其他域的用法,并在這個過程中總結(jié)三個介詞各自用法的異同之處。本文從三個介詞空間域的用法出發(fā),通過隱喻理論將其研究范圍擴(kuò)展到時間域,方式域,狀態(tài)域以及邏輯關(guān)系域。這一方法對于介詞空間教學(xué)的啟發(fā)意義在于:學(xué)習(xí)者可以在分析介詞空間認(rèn)知意義的基礎(chǔ)上更好的理解其抽象意義。本文同時也證明了意象圖示,隱喻理論對于詞語多義現(xiàn)象具有很強(qiáng)的解釋力度。而認(rèn)知框架下的介詞意義分析為認(rèn)識世界和語言提供了一種新的方式。 

【文章來源】：西安理工大學(xué)陜西省

【文章頁數(shù)】：70 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Significance of the Study
    1.3 Corpus and Data Collection
    1.4 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter2 Literature Review
    2.1.Previous Studies on Polysemy
    2.2 Cognitive Study on Prepositions’Polysemy
        2.2.1 Cognitive Study on Prepositions Polysemy Abroad
        2.2.2 Cognitive Study Prepositions Polysemy at Home
    2.3 Previous Cognitive Study on in,on and at
Chapter3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Image Scheme
        3.1.1 Definition of Image Scheme
        3.1.2 Internal Structure of Image Scheme
        3.1.3 Categorization of Image Scheme
        3.1.4 Function of Image Scheme
        3.1.5 Summary
    3.2 Metaphor
        3.2.1 Traditional View on Metaphor
        3.2.2 Cognitive Feature of Metaphor
        3.2.3 Essence of Metaphor—Similarity
        3.2.4 Working Mechanism of Metaphor
        3.2.5 Classification of Metaphor
        3.2.6 Summary
    3.3.The Theory of Prototype
    3.4 Summary
Chapter4 Analyses of in,on and at from the Perspectives of Cognitive Linguistics
    4.1 Prototypical Meanings of in,on and at
    4.2 Image Scheme of in,on and at
        4.2.1 Image Scheme of in
        4.2.2 Image Scheme of on
        4.2.3 Image Scheme of at
        4.2.4 Summary
    4.3 Metaphorical Extensions in Other Domains of in,on,and at
        4.3.1 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Time
        4.3.2 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Manner
        4.3.3 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Situation
        4.3.4 From Spatial Domain to Domain of Logical Relation
        4.3.5 Summary
    4.4 Analyses of in,on and at in Other Domains
        4.4.1 Differences Between in and at in Other Domains
        4.4.2 Differences Between in and on in Other Domains
        4.4.3 Differences Between on and at in Other Domains
        4.4.4 Summary
Chapter5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 Limitations of the Study
    5.3 Suggestions for Future Studies
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
Achievements



本文編號：3602554