當(dāng)代中國(guó)的文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)研究
[Abstract]:At the end of the 1980s, the western literary ethics criticism returned to the upsurge, but the revival was not to return to the traditional criticism, nor to the reaffirmation of the moral criticism, but to refute the formalism literary theory. It is the reorientation of literature as a cognitive way. At the beginning of the new century, the literary criticism circle also appeared the literary ethics criticism turn. In the ten years of development, it put forward a series of critical core terms on the basis of ethical choice. The use of practice has increased significantly, and the number of articles used to analyze literary works from the perspective of this critical method is increasing year by year. However, compared with other critical methods, this method starts late and develops slowly in our country, showing some problems. For example, the concept of ethical criticism and moral criticism is not clear, which directly leads to the mixed use and misuse of criticism practice, and the articles that claim to use this method are still the product of traditional moral criticism, but the critics do not know themselves; The confusion between ethics and instruction makes the bipolar opposition between education and aesthetics become the opposite of ethics and aesthetics, and makes the method of criticism develop in the extreme direction; the misuse and over-interpretation of criticism practice, The phenomenon of low-level replication of similar propositions also gradually appears. This method of criticism provides a new perspective and a new way of thinking for literary criticism in China. However, in the process of future development, Chinese scholars and related researchers still need to continue to improve the theoretical system and clarify the relevant concepts. Continue to expand the scope and depth of practical use, deal with, and solve the problems arising from this critical method. In the future development of our country, this pluralistic and inclusive criticism method will continue to show its strong vitality and creativity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:I06
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 唐代興;;倫理本體性:文學(xué)研究的真正基礎(chǔ)[J];天府新論;2016年02期
2 范淵凱;;我國(guó)文學(xué)倫理學(xué)研究的歷史與現(xiàn)狀[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年04期
3 楊和平;熊元義;;文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)與當(dāng)代文學(xué)的道德批判[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2015年02期
4 宋志宇;;文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)研究綜述[J];呂梁學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期
5 宋皓;;文學(xué)倫理批評(píng)視角下的杰克·倫敦及其經(jīng)典作品[J];宿州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年11期
6 聶珍釗;;文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng):論文學(xué)的基本功能與核心價(jià)值[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2014年04期
7 郭麗;;阿米爾的自我救贖之路——從文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)角度分析《追風(fēng)箏的人》[J];海外英語(yǔ);2013年18期
8 周德海;;論道德和倫理概念及其相互關(guān)系[J];唐都學(xué)刊;2012年02期
9 聶珍釗;;文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng):倫理選擇與斯芬克斯因子[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2011年06期
10 聶珍釗;;文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng):基本理論與術(shù)語(yǔ)[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2010年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 修樹(shù)新;托妮·莫里森小說(shuō)的文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 史友玉;文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)與中學(xué)語(yǔ)文閱讀教學(xué)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年
2 徐迪彥;彌爾頓詩(shī)歌倫理學(xué)批評(píng)初探[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號(hào):2132151
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/2132151.html