中美選秀節(jié)目中禮貌補救策略的順應性研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-14 13:06
【摘要】：本文的研究對象是中美選秀節(jié)目中的禮貌補救策的語言選擇。禮貌是一種語用現(xiàn)象,也是一種社會現(xiàn)象,廣泛運用于日常生活與工作中。近年來,禮貌問題引起了許多語言學者的關注。在眾多有關禮貌的理論中,由Brown和Levinson于1978年提出的“面子理論”是最具影響力。他們認為“面子”是每個人都想要和期望其他人認可的在公眾中的自我形象。在交際中,人們面子不可避免地會受到某些言語行為的威脅。一旦有人威脅到了聽話人的面子,面子威脅行為即FTAs(face threatening acts)繼而產(chǎn)生。因此,說話人需要采取適當?shù)拇胧┮詼p輕對聽話人的冒犯。在電視選秀節(jié)目中,評委必須對選手的表演作出評價。在面子威脅行為不可避免時,評委需要采用一些禮貌策略來減輕對選手的言語冒犯的程度,并形成一種和諧的娛樂的氛圍。因此在選秀目中,采取補救措施是一種很有效的語用策略。Verschueren的順應論從一個新的語用學視角,結(jié)合了語言使用過程中的心理、社會以及文化因素,很好地闡釋了禮貌補救策略的動態(tài)順應。鑒此,本文擬以Verschueren的順應論為理論框架,對選秀節(jié)目中關于面子威脅行為的補救策略的選擇進行較為全面的分析。本文語料來自于兩檔選秀節(jié)目:《中國夢之聲》和《美國偶像》。本文分別以此兩檔選秀節(jié)目中六集的補救面子威脅的言語行為建立封閉性語料庫,采用了以定性研究為主,定量研究為輔的研究方法對語料中補救策略的選擇進行了分析。通過對語料的分析,本文提出了以下兩個研究問題:1.《中國夢之聲》和《美國偶像》中的評委各自使用了哪些補救策略?以順應論為理論框架,在此兩檔節(jié)目中,中國評委和美國評委使用補救策略的原因是什么?2.對兩國評委補救策略選擇的相同之處和不同點是什么?如何以順應論的角度來解釋產(chǎn)生這些異同的因素?通過研究,本文發(fā)現(xiàn):1.中國評委和美國評委都使用了禮貌策略。在25種補救策略中,中國評委和美國評委分別使用了15種策略。在此兩檔選秀節(jié)目中,所使用的補救策略的頻次分布表已呈現(xiàn)在第五章中。在兩檔選秀節(jié)目中,這些補救策略的選擇是說話人動態(tài)順應社交世界和心理世界等語境因素的結(jié)果。2.中國評委和美國評委都使用了大部分的補救策略,并且一些使用頻率較高的策略幾乎相同。同時,兩檔節(jié)目中評委所使用到的消極禮貌策略多于積極禮貌策略。但分別對所使用到的積極禮貌策略和消極禮貌策略進行對比發(fā)現(xiàn),中國評委偏愛使用積極禮貌策略,而美國評委相對較多使用消極策略。除此之外,個別子策略的使用頻率也有較為明顯的差異。以順應論的角度來看,在兩檔選秀節(jié)目中,評委都需要順應選秀節(jié)目中的共同的目的以及相同的選秀環(huán)境。但同時也要順應各自的社會與文化規(guī)范。面子威脅行為在日常交際中不可避免。因此,本研究不僅希望從順應論的角度更好地闡釋禮貌現(xiàn)象,并且能夠有助于語言使用者在特定的語境中選擇更為恰當?shù)�、更具有策略性的語用措施以保證交際的順利進行。
[Abstract]:The object of this study is the language selection of politeness remedies in Chinese and American show shows. Politeness is a pragmatic phenomenon and a social phenomenon. It is widely used in daily life and work. In recent years, politeness problems have aroused the attention of many linguists. In many theories, Brown and Levinson have been put forward in 1978. "Face theory" is the most influential. They believe that "face" is a public image that everyone wants and expects other people to recognize. In communication, face is inevitably threatened by some speech acts. Once someone threatens the face of the listener, face threat is FTAs (face threa). As a result, the speaker needs to take appropriate measures to mitigate the offense to the listener. In the TV show, the judges must evaluate the performance of the players. When the face threat is unavoidable, the judges need to adopt some politeness strategies to reduce the degree of offense to the contestants, and form a kind of tening. A harmonious atmosphere of entertainment. Therefore, in the draft, the adoption of remedial measures is a very effective pragmatic strategy,.Verschueren's adaptation theory, from a new pragmatic perspective, combining the psychological, social and cultural factors in the process of language use. It is a good explanation of the dynamic adaptation of the politeness supplementing strategy. Therefore, this article is intended to be Verschuere N's theory of adaptation is the theoretical framework to make a more comprehensive analysis of the choice of remedial strategies for face threatening behavior in the show. The corpus of this article comes from two show shows: < the sound of Chinese dream > and < American Idol >. This article sets up a closed language with the speech act of six sets of rescue face threats in the two show shows. In the material bank, the selection of remedial strategies in the corpus is analyzed with the qualitative research and quantitative research supplemented. Through the analysis of the corpus, the following two research questions are put forward: what are the remedial strategies used by the 1.< Chinese dream and the American Idol Judge? What are the reasons for the use of remedial strategies by the Chinese judges and the American judges in these two programs? What are the similarities and differences between the 2. remedial strategies of the judges of the two countries? How to explain the differences and similarities in the perspective of adaptation theory? Through research, 1. the Chinese judges and the American judges have used politeness strategies. Among the 25 remedial strategies, the Chinese judges and the American judges used 15 strategies respectively. In the two show, the frequency distribution table of the remedial strategies used in the two show has been presented in the fifth chapter. In the two draft show, the choice of these remedial strategies is the junctions of the speaker's dynamic adaptation to the social and psychological contexts. .2. both Chinese judges and the American judges have used most of the remedial strategies, and some of the more frequently used strategies are almost the same. At the same time, the negative politeness strategies used by the judges in the two programs are more than the positive politeness strategies. But the positive politeness strategy and the negative politeness strategy used are compared to China, respectively. The judges prefer the use of positive politeness strategies, while the American judges use more negative strategies. In addition, the use frequency of the sub strategy is also distinct. In the perspective of adaptation, the judges need to comply with the common purposes and the same talent show environment in the two show shows. It is also necessary to conform to their social and cultural norms. Face threat is unavoidable in daily communication. Therefore, this study not only hopes to explain politeness better from the perspective of adaptation theory, but also helps language users choose more appropriate and more strategic pragmatic measures in specific contexts to ensure communication. Proceed smoothly.
【學位授予單位】：西北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H030
[Abstract]:The object of this study is the language selection of politeness remedies in Chinese and American show shows. Politeness is a pragmatic phenomenon and a social phenomenon. It is widely used in daily life and work. In recent years, politeness problems have aroused the attention of many linguists. In many theories, Brown and Levinson have been put forward in 1978. "Face theory" is the most influential. They believe that "face" is a public image that everyone wants and expects other people to recognize. In communication, face is inevitably threatened by some speech acts. Once someone threatens the face of the listener, face threat is FTAs (face threa). As a result, the speaker needs to take appropriate measures to mitigate the offense to the listener. In the TV show, the judges must evaluate the performance of the players. When the face threat is unavoidable, the judges need to adopt some politeness strategies to reduce the degree of offense to the contestants, and form a kind of tening. A harmonious atmosphere of entertainment. Therefore, in the draft, the adoption of remedial measures is a very effective pragmatic strategy,.Verschueren's adaptation theory, from a new pragmatic perspective, combining the psychological, social and cultural factors in the process of language use. It is a good explanation of the dynamic adaptation of the politeness supplementing strategy. Therefore, this article is intended to be Verschuere N's theory of adaptation is the theoretical framework to make a more comprehensive analysis of the choice of remedial strategies for face threatening behavior in the show. The corpus of this article comes from two show shows: < the sound of Chinese dream > and < American Idol >. This article sets up a closed language with the speech act of six sets of rescue face threats in the two show shows. In the material bank, the selection of remedial strategies in the corpus is analyzed with the qualitative research and quantitative research supplemented. Through the analysis of the corpus, the following two research questions are put forward: what are the remedial strategies used by the 1.< Chinese dream and the American Idol Judge? What are the reasons for the use of remedial strategies by the Chinese judges and the American judges in these two programs? What are the similarities and differences between the 2. remedial strategies of the judges of the two countries? How to explain the differences and similarities in the perspective of adaptation theory? Through research, 1. the Chinese judges and the American judges have used politeness strategies. Among the 25 remedial strategies, the Chinese judges and the American judges used 15 strategies respectively. In the two show, the frequency distribution table of the remedial strategies used in the two show has been presented in the fifth chapter. In the two draft show, the choice of these remedial strategies is the junctions of the speaker's dynamic adaptation to the social and psychological contexts. .2. both Chinese judges and the American judges have used most of the remedial strategies, and some of the more frequently used strategies are almost the same. At the same time, the negative politeness strategies used by the judges in the two programs are more than the positive politeness strategies. But the positive politeness strategy and the negative politeness strategy used are compared to China, respectively. The judges prefer the use of positive politeness strategies, while the American judges use more negative strategies. In addition, the use frequency of the sub strategy is also distinct. In the perspective of adaptation, the judges need to comply with the common purposes and the same talent show environment in the two show shows. It is also necessary to conform to their social and cultural norms. Face threat is unavoidable in daily communication. Therefore, this study not only hopes to explain politeness better from the perspective of adaptation theory, but also helps language users choose more appropriate and more strategic pragmatic measures in specific contexts to ensure communication. Proceed smoothly.
【學位授予單位】：西北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H030
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前8條
1 譚克新;;俄漢互譯時的形式信息失真及其補救策略[J];中國俄語教學;2010年01期
2 龔琳;;面子保全論視角下奧巴馬總統(tǒng)2009年開學演講[J];蘭州工業(yè)高等�？茖W校學報;2012年01期
3 陳e，
本文編號：2121742
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/2121742.html
教材專著
