本文選題：道德　切入點(diǎn)：垂直空間　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：道德概念隱喻的相關(guān)研究,一定程度上說明了道德概念隱喻的心理現(xiàn)實(shí)性,但對(duì)于道德概念與垂直空間啟動(dòng)關(guān)系的結(jié)論并不一致。有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)概念表征的映射是單向的,也有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)概念表征的映射是雙向的,而兩個(gè)方向的聯(lián)結(jié)強(qiáng)度是不對(duì)稱的。本研究通過啟動(dòng)實(shí)驗(yàn)范式,探討道德概念對(duì)垂直空間的啟動(dòng),以及垂直空間對(duì)道德概念的啟動(dòng)。兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)分別控制目標(biāo)刺激的注意指向,探討在不同注意指向條件下,概念隱喻一致性效應(yīng)的區(qū)別,進(jìn)而揭示道德概念與垂直空間之間的映射關(guān)系是否是對(duì)稱的,以及這種映射關(guān)系的神經(jīng)電生理機(jī)制。實(shí)驗(yàn)1分別采用不指向空間(字母判斷)和指向空間(空間位置判斷)的任務(wù),探討從道德概念到垂直空間的啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),在不指向空間的任務(wù)中,一致性條件(道德—上、不道德—下)與不一致性條件(道德—下、不道德—上)被試判斷的反應(yīng)時(shí)無差異,誘發(fā)的ERP成分無差異;在指向空間任務(wù)中,一致性條件下被試判斷得更快,不一致性條件下占用了更多的認(rèn)知資源,誘發(fā)了更大的P300。實(shí)驗(yàn)2分別采用指向道德(道德效價(jià)判斷)與不指向道德(字體判斷)的任務(wù),探討從垂直空間到道德概念的啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),在指向道德的任務(wù)中,一致性條件下在“道德—上”這一維度被試的判斷更快,一致性條件誘發(fā)更大的P200,目標(biāo)刺激探測(cè)更快,不一致條件下誘發(fā)了更大的N400,語義違反程度更強(qiáng);在不指向道德的任務(wù)中,一致性條件與不一致性條件被試判斷的反應(yīng)時(shí)無差異,誘發(fā)的ERP成分無差異。綜合兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明,道德概念與垂直空間之間存在雙向啟動(dòng)關(guān)系,但這種啟動(dòng)關(guān)系會(huì)受到注意指向的影響,支持了協(xié)同工作模型(Coherent Working Models,CWM)的假設(shè)。
[Abstract]:To some extent, the study of moral conceptual metaphor illustrates the psychological reality of moral conceptual metaphor, but the conclusion of the relationship between moral concept and vertical spatial priming is inconsistent. Some studies have found that the mapping of conceptual representation is unidirectional. Some studies have also found that the mapping of conceptual representation is bidirectional, and the intensity of connection between the two directions is asymmetric. And the initiation of moral concept in vertical space. The two experiments respectively controlled the attention direction of target stimulus, and explored the difference of the consistency effect of conceptual metaphor under different attention points. And then reveal whether the mapping relationship between moral concepts and vertical space is symmetric, In experiment 1, the priming effect from moral concept to vertical space was discussed by using the tasks of not pointing to space (alphabetical judgment) and pointing to space (spatial position judgment), respectively. In the task that does not point to space, there is no difference in the reaction time between the consistency condition (moral-upper, immoral-lower) and the inconsistent condition (moral-lower, immoral-upper), and there is no difference in the induced ERP component; In the task of pointing to space, the subjects judged more quickly under the condition of consistency, and occupied more cognitive resources under the condition of inconsistency. In experiment 2, the priming effect from vertical space to moral concept was explored by using the task of pointing to morality (moral value judgment) and not pointing to morality (font judgment). Under the condition of consistency, the subjects' judgment is faster in the dimension of "moral-upper", the consistency condition induces a larger P200, the target stimulus detects faster, the inconsistent condition induces a larger N400, and the degree of semantic violation is stronger. In the task that does not point to morality, there is no difference in the reaction time between the consistency condition and the inconsistent condition, and there is no difference in the induced ERP component. The two experimental results show that there is a bidirectional priming relationship between the moral concept and the vertical space. However, this startup relationship is influenced by attention points, supporting the hypothesis of a cooperative work model, coherence Working models (CWM).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魯忠義;賈利寧;翟冬雪;;道德概念垂直空間隱喻理解中的映射:雙向性及不平衡性[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2017年02期

2 武向慈;王恩國;;權(quán)力概念加工對(duì)視覺空間注意定向的影響:一個(gè)ERP證據(jù)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2014年12期

3 殷融;葉浩生;;道德概念的黑白隱喻表征及其對(duì)道德認(rèn)知的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2014年09期

4 王锃;魯忠義;;道德概念的垂直空間隱喻及其對(duì)認(rèn)知的影響[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2013年05期

5 呂軍梅;魯忠義;;為什么快樂在“上”,悲傷在“下”——語篇閱讀中情緒的垂直空間隱喻[J];心理科學(xué);2013年02期

6 殷融;蘇得權(quán);葉浩生;;具身認(rèn)知視角下的概念隱喻理論[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年02期

7 葉浩生;;具身認(rèn)知、鏡像神經(jīng)元與身心關(guān)系[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

8 葉浩生;;有關(guān)具身認(rèn)知思潮的理論心理學(xué)思考[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

9 李其維;;“認(rèn)知革命”與“第二代認(rèn)知科學(xué)”芻議[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2008年12期

10 齊振海;彭聃齡;;第三代認(rèn)知科學(xué)下的語言研究[J];中國外語;2007年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 顧倩;道德概念垂直空間隱喻的心理現(xiàn)實(shí)性[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

2 賈利寧;道德概念垂直空間隱喻映射的雙向性[D];河北師范大學(xué);2014年

3 常晶晶;情緒具身觀：來自ERP和fMRI的證據(jù)[D];西南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1684369