本文關(guān)鍵詞：王陽(yáng)明“知行合一”說(shuō)探析　出處：《沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 王陽(yáng)明 知行合一 心即理 致良知 成圣

【摘要】：“知”與“行”是我國(guó)古代哲學(xué)史上的重要范疇。從古至今,“知行觀”作為熱門(mén)論題被世人所詮釋和發(fā)展,在中國(guó)哲學(xué)史上占據(jù)極為重要的位置。王陽(yáng)明的知行觀概括了“知”與“行”之間的聯(lián)系,而他的“知行合一”更是作為陽(yáng)明學(xué)思想體系中影響最大的學(xué)說(shuō),被國(guó)內(nèi)外的后繼者奉為圭臬,被無(wú)數(shù)有此志趣的學(xué)人探討與研究,其中不乏有很多新的理解和創(chuàng)建。本文主要對(duì)王陽(yáng)明心學(xué)體系中極為重要的核心思想“知行合一”進(jìn)行探討和分析,以王陽(yáng)明“知行合一”思想的形成背景、主要內(nèi)容以及社會(huì)意義這三個(gè)主要部分進(jìn)行闡述和分析。文章的開(kāi)篇從時(shí)代背景、個(gè)人經(jīng)歷以及思想淵源介紹“知行合一”說(shuō)的由來(lái)。進(jìn)而著重分析王陽(yáng)明“知行合一”思想的主要內(nèi)容,強(qiáng)調(diào)“知行合一”就是知善知惡、為善去惡。同時(shí)明確“知行合一”分別與“心即理”、“致良知”的關(guān)系,指出心中的良知就是所謂的天理,在為人處世上要遵循內(nèi)心的良知,做到“知行合一”,才能達(dá)到至善的境界,成為圣賢。通過(guò)以上內(nèi)容的分析,最終論述“知行合一”說(shuō)的歷史意義與時(shí)代價(jià)值,意在強(qiáng)調(diào)“知行合一”說(shuō)在當(dāng)今社會(huì)中不同領(lǐng)域的實(shí)踐作用。近些年來(lái),隨著當(dāng)下中國(guó)人文精神和傳統(tǒng)文化的強(qiáng)化與發(fā)揚(yáng),中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)哲學(xué)思想魅力也凸顯在社會(huì)的各個(gè)層面和領(lǐng)域,不論是對(duì)“知行合一”說(shuō)奉若秘笈,還是褒貶不一,都有必要本著謙恭的心態(tài),準(zhǔn)確闡釋和把握“知行合一”思想,充分認(rèn)識(shí)到自身的“主體性”,發(fā)揮在治國(guó)為民和安身立業(yè)實(shí)踐中的自覺(jué)性、能動(dòng)性,顯得尤為重要。
[Abstract]:"knowledge" and "action" are important categories in the history of ancient Chinese philosophy. From ancient to present, the concept of "knowing and doing" has been interpreted and developed by the world as a hot topic. Wang Yangming's concept of knowing and doing sums up the relationship between "know" and "action", and his "unity of knowledge and action" is the most influential theory in the thought system of Yangming. It is regarded as the standard by successors at home and abroad, and has been explored and studied by countless scholars with this interest. Among them, there are many new understanding and creation. This paper mainly discusses and analyzes Wang Yangming's core thought of "integration of knowledge and action", which is very important in the psychological system of Wang Yangming, in order to form the background of the thought of "integration of knowledge and action". The main content and social significance of these three main parts of the elaboration and analysis. The beginning of the article from the background of the times. Personal experience and ideological origin introduce the origin of the theory of "unity of knowledge and action", and then focus on the analysis of the main content of Wang Yangming's thought of "integration of knowledge and practice", and emphasize that "unity of knowledge and practice" is knowledge of good and knowledge of evil. At the same time, it is clear that the relationship between "the unity of knowledge and action" and "the heart is reason" and "to the conscience", pointing out that the conscience of the heart is the so-called God's principle, and we should follow the inner conscience in dealing with people in the world. To achieve the "unity of knowledge and action", we can achieve the state of the greatest good and become saints. Through the analysis of the above contents, we can finally discuss the historical significance and the value of the times of the theory of "unity of knowledge and action". In recent years, with the strengthening and development of the present Chinese humanistic spirit and traditional culture, it is intended to emphasize the practical role of the theory of "integration of knowledge and action" in different fields of society today. The charm of Chinese traditional philosophy is also highlighted in all levels and fields of society. It is necessary to be humble in the attitude of "unity of knowledge and practice", whether it is a secret or a mixed appraisal. It is particularly important to accurately explain and grasp the thought of "integration of knowledge and action", fully realize its "subjectivity", and give play to its consciousness and initiative in the practice of running the country for the people and establishing its own business.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B248.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盛珂;;“致良知”工夫論的新視角——王陽(yáng)明的“立志說(shuō)”[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2012年10期

2 張少蘭;;知行合一:高等職業(yè)院�！八枷氲赖滦摒B(yǎng)與法律基礎(chǔ)”課教學(xué)探究[J];思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊;2012年10期

3 余純;;淺析“知行合一”的現(xiàn)代價(jià)值[J];人民論壇;2012年23期

4 姚才剛;;王陽(yáng)明心學(xué)的理論缺失及其對(duì)中晚明儒學(xué)發(fā)展的影響[J];哲學(xué)研究;2010年12期

5 楊國(guó)榮;;理學(xué)的倫理向度——從張載到王陽(yáng)明[J];倫理學(xué)研究;2009年01期

6 翟奎鳳;;致良知與致中和——王陽(yáng)明中和論思想發(fā)微[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

7 何靜;;論王陽(yáng)明的致良知說(shuō)對(duì)儒釋道三教的融合[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期

8 張?zhí)鞎?;知行合一的傳統(tǒng)倫理意蘊(yùn)[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年09期

9 胡小林;;朱熹與王守仁的知行觀[J];孔子研究;2005年06期

10 戴岳;王陽(yáng)明“知行合一”論在現(xiàn)代思想道德建設(shè)中的意義[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1419644