天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 碩博論文 > 社科博士論文 >

國際法視角下巴勒斯坦被占領(lǐng)土上戰(zhàn)俘的法律保護(hù)

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-07-21 05:15
  本文旨在大體闡述國際法特別是國際人道主義法在保護(hù)戰(zhàn)俘中所扮演的角色,因?yàn)樵摲ㄍㄟ^保護(hù)人權(quán)和維護(hù)人的尊嚴(yán)的條約以及公約來保護(hù)戰(zhàn)俘的權(quán)利。自1967年以色列占領(lǐng)巴勒斯坦領(lǐng)土以來,三分之一以上的巴勒斯坦人被監(jiān)禁。盡管國際上認(rèn)可巴勒斯坦人民的民族自決權(quán),國際社會也不斷譴責(zé)以色列占領(lǐng)當(dāng)局的非法占領(lǐng),但是以色列仍然將巴勒斯坦人民作為無國家和無主權(quán)的群體對待。因而,以色列在對待巴勒斯坦囚犯時(shí)不是把他們視為戰(zhàn)俘和捍衛(wèi)其家園的合法自由的斗士,而是把他們當(dāng)作刑事罪犯和危害國家安全的囚犯來對待,這是對戰(zhàn)士和一般巴勒斯坦公民尊嚴(yán)的嚴(yán)重侵犯。以色列任意拘留巴勒斯坦人,否認(rèn)他們受國際人道主義法和人權(quán)法保障的法律和人道主義權(quán)利,這顯然違反了這些法律和司法規(guī)則。通過這項(xiàng)研究,可以進(jìn)一步明確許多國際公約和條約所載巴勒斯坦囚犯的權(quán)利,這些國際公約和條約也為巴勒斯坦囚犯的權(quán)利提供了許多細(xì)節(jié)。然而,問題是如何使以色列占領(lǐng)當(dāng)局尊重這些公約和協(xié)定。為了向巴勒斯坦囚犯提供保護(hù)并歸還他們應(yīng)有的一切權(quán)利,我們還描述了根據(jù)國際人道主義法對巴勒斯坦囚犯進(jìn)行法律變通的情況。此外,文章還闡明了被占領(lǐng)的巴勒斯坦領(lǐng)土的法律地位、巴勒斯坦囚犯的法律... 

【文章來源】:中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】:225 頁

【學(xué)位級別】:博士

【文章目錄】:
Abstract
摘要
Dedication
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations and Symbols
General Background
Chapter1 Controversial Legal Status of the Occupied Palestinian Territories
    1.1 Legal adaptation of the Palestinian Territories
        1.1.1 Israeli interpretation and arguments
            1.1.1.1 Israeli interpretation of common article(2)of the Geneva Conventions
            1.1.1.2 Israeli interpretation of article(6)of the Fourth Geneva Convention
            1.1.1.3 Ruling on the status quo or the rule of law(de jure)or(de facto)?
        1.1.2 Rejection of Israeli interpretation by Palestinian Authority and official international bodies
            1.1.2.1 Response to the Israeli interpretation of common article(2)of the Geneva Conventions
            1.1.2.2 Response to the Israeli interpretation of article(6)of the Fourth Geneva Conventions
            1.1.2.3 Ruling on the status quo or the rule of law(de jure)or(de facto)?
    1.2 How legitimate are the legal justifications for the Israeli presence in Palestine
        1.2.1 Partition Resolution No.181 as justification for Israeli sovereignty over the Palestinian territories
        1.2.2 The legal theories by which Israel justifies its sovereignty over the Palestinian territories beyond the limits laid down in the Partition Resolution
    1.3 The right of the Palestinian people to Self-determination and resist
        1.3.1 Legal basis for the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination
        1.3.2 UN resolutions on the legitimacy of the Palestinian people to resist occupation
    1.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter2 The situation of Palestinian Prisoners in Israeli Occupation Prisons
    2.1 The concept of prisoners of war and the historical evolution of their legal status
        2.1.1 Definition of prisoners of war
            2.1.1.1 The definition of prisoners of war according to The Hague Regulations(1889_1907)
            2.1.1.2 The Definition of prisoners of war according to the Geneva Conventions(1949)
                2.1.1.2.1 The scope of application of concept prisoners of war in the Geneva Conventions(1949)
        2.1.2 Differences between prisoners of war and similar concepts
            2.1.2.1 The difference between prisoners of war and detainees
            2.1.2.2 The difference between prisoners of war and Security Prisoners
            2.1.2.3 The difference between prisoners of war and abductees
        2.1.3 Historical development of the legal status of prisoners of war
            2.1.3.1 The legal status of prisoners of war in antiquity
            2.1.3.2 The legal status of prisoners of war in modern times
    2.2 The Legal Description of Palestinian Prisoners in the occupied Palestinian territories
        2.2.1 Description of Palestinian prisoners as detainees by the Fourth Geneva Convention
        2.2.2 Description of Palestinian prisoners as prisoners of war by the third Geneva Convention
        2.2.3 Description of Palestinian prisoners as abductees in accordance with the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages
    2.3 The applicability of description prisoners of war to Palestinian Prisoners in the Occupied Palestinian territories
        2.3.1 Palestine and Israel are members of the Geneva Conventions
        2.3.2 Before and after the Oslo Accords between Palestine and Israel
        2.3.3 Before and after the accession of Palestine to the UN in
    2.4 International Attitudes Toward the Issue of Palestinian Prisoners in occupied Palestinian territory
        2.4.1 The UN Stance towards the Palestinian Prisoners
        2.4.2 The ICRC’s Stance towards the Palestinian Prisoners
        2.4.3 The Stance of the permanent members of the Security Council
    2.5 Chapter summary
Chapter3 Israeli violations of the rules for the protection of prisoners of war
    3.1 Israeli domestic law conflicts with international law
        3.1.1 Arbitrary administrative detention law in contravention of article78 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
        3.1.2 Law on forced feeding of prisoners on hunger strike in violation of article6 of the Tokyo Declaration
        3.1.3 Law on the detention of children under14 in contravention of article16 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child
    3.2 Israeli violations at the arrest and during detention
        3.2.1 Methods of the arrest of the Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
            3.2.1.1 Arrest of Palestinians through raiding houses
            3.2.1.2 Arrest of Palestinians from international crossing points
            3.2.1.3 Arrest of Palestinians at Israeli military checkpoints in the occupied Palestinian territories
        3.2.2 Conditions of detention of the Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails
            3.2.2.1 Torture of Palestinian prisoners in violation of Article1 of the Convention against Torture
            3.2.2.2 Medical negligence and lack of medical care in violation of articles29-31 of the Third Geneva Convention
            3.2.2.3 Long-term solitary confinement in violation of article119 of the Fourth Geneva Convention
            3.2.2.4 Denial of family visits violates article71 of the Third Geneva Convention
            3.2.2.5 Deprivation of the right to education of Palestinian prisoners in violation of article38 of the Third Geneva Convention
            3.2.2.6 The detention outside the borders of the occupied territories in violation of article76 of the Fourth Geneva convention
    3.3 International evidence of Israeli violations against Palestinian
        3.3.1 UNICEF report on the mistreatment of Palestinian children in Israeli prisons in
        3.3.2 Report of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the arbitrary detention by Israeli authorities in
        3.3.3 Report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia(ESCWA)on the torture of Palestinian prisoners in the occupied territories in
        3.3.4 The European Parliamentary Committee was prevented from visiting prisons in the occupied territories by the Israeli authorities in
    3.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter4 Palestinian and international practices and mechanisms for the protection of prisoners of war
    4.1 Palestinian practices to obtain protection for Palestinian prisoners
        4.1.1 Palestinian Authority Practices for the Protection of Palestinian Prisoners
            4.1.1.1 Conduct Political negotiations and good-faith initiatives between the Palestinian Authority and Israeli Occupation
            4.1.1.2 Palestine submitted ICC referral to open probe into Israeli crimes
            4.1.1.3 Palestine's accession to the Third Geneva Convention
        4.1.2 The practices of official Palestinian institutions for the Protection of Palestinian Prisoners
            4.1.2.1 The duties of the official Palestinian institutions in defending the Palestinian prisoners
            4.1.2.2 The role of the Palestinian judiciary in prosecuting the crimes of the occupation against the Palestinian prisoners
        4.1.3 Practices of Palestinian non-official institutions in the protection of Palestinian prisoners
            4.1.3.1 The Palestinian public's practices in defending the Palestinian prisoners
            4.1.3.2 Activities of Palestinian non-official institutions in defending Palestinian prisoners
    4.2 Palestinian mechanisms for the protection of prisoners of war
        4.2.1 Commitment to prevention
            4.2.1.1 Obligation to disseminate knowledge of the rules for the Protection of prisoners of war
            4.2.1.2 Obligation to harmonise domestic legislation
            4.2.1.3 Accession to international conventions on the protection of prisoners of war
        4.2.2 Commitment to oversight
            4.2.2.1 Commitment to establish a formal office for the Declaration of Prisoners of War
            4.2.2.2 Oversight The right of prisoners to lodge complaints
            4.2.2.3 Oversight The right of prisoners to choose their representatives
        4.2.3 Commitment to repression
            4.2.3.1 To suppress crimes committed against prisoners of war
            4.2.3.2 To prosecute and hold accountable perpetrators of grave violations against prisoners
    4.3 Practices of international mechanisms for the protection of prisoners of war
        4.3.1 International Committee of the Red Cross(ICRC)
            4.3.1.1 A brief history about the International Committee of the Red Cross
            4.3.1.2 Role of the Committee in overseeing the implementation of the Rules for the Protection of prisoners of war
        4.3.2 The neutral state
            4.3.2.1 Replacing the Protecting state with the Neutral State
            4.3.2.2 Agreement of the disputing parties to detain prisoners in a neutral state
            4.3.2.3 The effect of the prisoner’s asylum on the territory of a neutral State
        4.3.3 International Fact-Finding Commission
        4.3.4 Practices of human rights bodies for the protection of prisoners of war
            4.3.4.1 Human Rights Council
            4.3.4.2 Human Rights Watch
            4.3.4.3 The European Network to Support the Rights of Palestinian Prisoners(U free)
    4.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter5 Responsibility for Violation of the rules for the Protection of Prisoners of War
    5.1 Israeli responsibility towards Palestinian prisoners in the occupied territories
        5.1.1 The Basis of Israel's international legal responsibility
            5.1.1.1 Commission of an unlawful act under international law
                5.1.1.1.1 Responsibility of the State for acts of the legislative power
                5.1.1.1.2 Responsibility of the State for the acts of the judicial authority
                5.1.1.1.3 State responsibility for the acts of the executive power
            5.1.1.2 The wrongful act violates an international obligation entered into by the State in the context of its international relations
            5.1.1.3 Damage caused by the wrongful act
        5.1.2 Ways of proving Israeli violations against Palestinian prisoners in the occupied territories
            5.1.2.1 Through the International Fact-Finding Commission
            5.1.2.2 Through international arbitration
            5.1.2.3 Through the International Court of Justice
        5.1.3 The results of proving Israel's international responsibility
            5.1.3.1 Obligation to cease unlawful acts
                5.1.3.1.1 Israel's commitment to stop violations of international law emanating from its legislative authority
                5.1.3.1.2 Israel's commitment to stop the illegal acts of its executive authority
                5.1.3.1.3 Israel's commitment to cease unlawful acts of its judicial authority
            5.1.3.2 Obligation to repair the damage
                5.1.3.2.1 Restore the situation to what it was before the wrongful act occurred(compensation in kind)
                5.1.3.2.2 Financial compensation
                5.1.3.2.3 Satisfaction(Submit an official apology)
        5.1.4 Israel's Responsibility towards Palestinian prisoners under the rules of international humanitarian law
            5.1.4.1 Israel must comply with the rules of IHL as a member of the Geneva Conventions under Common Article1 of the Geneva Conventions
            5.1.4.2 Ensuring the safety of Palestinian prisoners under Article13 of the Third Geneva Convention
            5.1.4.3 Bringing Palestinian detentions to a fair trial in the occupied territories under article66 of the Fourth Geneva
    5.2 Individual’s international legal responsibility
        5.2.1 The basis of international legal responsibility for individuals
            5.2.1.1 Initiation and criminal contribution to the commission of International Crimes
                5.2.1.1.1 Attempt to commit war crimes
                5.2.1.1.2 Personal criminal contribution to the commission of International Crimes
            5.2.1.2 The establishment of individual international responsibility and reasons for its abstention
        5.2.2 Legal mechanisms for the prosecution of individuals who commit crimes against humanity
            5.2.2.1 Formation of a particular war criminals court for Israeli war criminals by a resolution of the SC UN
            5.2.2.2 Their trial before the national courts of the States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention of1949 by article
            5.2.2.3 Their trial before the national courts of States parties to the UN on the basis of the principle of international criminal jurisdiction
            5.2.2.4 Trial before the International Criminal Court
    5.3 US responsibility for Israeli crimes against Palestinians
        5.3.1 US political support for Israel
            5.3.1.1 The use of the veto against the Palestinian demands
            5.3.1.2 The US has used economic pressure tactics on some countries of the world in order not to condemn Israel
            5.3.1.3 US Political statements in favour of Israel
        5.3.2 US military support for Israel
            5.3.2.1 The signing of the Strategic Cooperation Agreement between the US and Israel in
            5.3.2.2 The use of US weapons against the Palestinian people
    5.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter6 General Conclusion and Recommendations
    6.1 Conclusion
    6.2 Recommendations
        6.2.1 Internationalization of the issue of Palestinian prisoners
        6.2.2 It is necessary to approach the UNGA to request an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the issue of Palestinian prisoners
        6.2.3 Restoring the Palestinian cause to the UN and getting rid of USA hegemony
        6.2.4 Urge the UNSC to establish a permanent International Monitoring Committee in the occupied Palestinian territories
Bibliography



本文編號:3294388

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/3294388.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶9412b***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com