本文選題：鍛煉行為 + 角色認(rèn)同模型��； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：鍛煉認(rèn)同指的是個(gè)體對(duì)自己是一位鍛煉者的認(rèn)同程度。鍛煉認(rèn)同與鍛煉行為的關(guān)系是鍛煉認(rèn)同研究的核心內(nèi)容。國(guó)外現(xiàn)有研究常將鍛煉認(rèn)同作為獨(dú)立變量加入到傳統(tǒng)鍛煉行為理論模型之中或?qū)⑵渑c其它鍛煉心理變量整合建立鍛煉行為模型,由于忽視了對(duì)鍛煉認(rèn)同結(jié)構(gòu)的深入了解,使其所建構(gòu)的模型出現(xiàn)了冗余現(xiàn)象。鍛煉認(rèn)同研究二十幾年來(lái),都未能在認(rèn)同理論框架內(nèi)建立起具有層次性的鍛煉行為模型,這使鍛煉認(rèn)同在預(yù)測(cè)鍛煉行為的研究中常處于從屬地位,未能充分發(fā)揮鍛煉認(rèn)同的最大價(jià)值。本研究從鍛煉認(rèn)同的構(gòu)成成分出發(fā),對(duì)EIS和AIQ兩份量表的結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行重新整合,并借鑒認(rèn)同建構(gòu)過(guò)程理論和Kendzierski等人的PASDM研制思想,建構(gòu)鍛煉角色認(rèn)同模型,在鍛煉領(lǐng)域考察角色認(rèn)同和特質(zhì)認(rèn)同的關(guān)系。為了避免在鍛煉行為模型建構(gòu)中出現(xiàn)如計(jì)劃行為理論模型中意向與行為之間的“鴻溝”現(xiàn)象,本研究在鍛煉行為模型建構(gòu)前事先通過(guò)比較研究對(duì)鍛煉認(rèn)同各變量對(duì)鍛煉行為的解釋力進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),考察鍛煉認(rèn)同各變量、鍛煉自我定義、運(yùn)動(dòng)承諾和鍛煉行為調(diào)節(jié)等對(duì)鍛煉行為的單獨(dú)預(yù)測(cè)作用和相對(duì)預(yù)測(cè)價(jià)值,為建立具有良好預(yù)測(cè)作用的青少年鍛煉行為模型奠定基礎(chǔ)。在確認(rèn)角色認(rèn)同是鍛煉行為最佳預(yù)測(cè)變量的基礎(chǔ)上,本研究進(jìn)一步探討基于角色認(rèn)同的青少年鍛煉行為模型。為了全面考察角色認(rèn)同模型對(duì)鍛煉行為的預(yù)測(cè)價(jià)值,本研究修正和建構(gòu)了多個(gè)模型進(jìn)行比較,主要有：自我定義模型、修正后的跨文化模型、SDT模型、SDT-RI模型。其中,角色認(rèn)同模型、自我定義模型均是在認(rèn)同理論框架內(nèi)建構(gòu)的鍛煉行為模型,前者體現(xiàn)的是相互依存的自我觀,后者體現(xiàn)的是獨(dú)立的自我觀；SDT模型是傳統(tǒng)的鍛煉行為模型,SDT-RI模型和修正后的跨文化模型是整合模型。最后,根據(jù)比較結(jié)果,確定最優(yōu)鍛煉行為預(yù)測(cè)模型。本研究的主要結(jié)論有：1)青少年鍛煉角色認(rèn)同模型是可以接受的分析框架；2)角色認(rèn)同對(duì)青少年鍛煉行為的單獨(dú)預(yù)測(cè)作用和相對(duì)預(yù)測(cè)作用均大于特質(zhì)認(rèn)同各變量、鍛煉自我定義、鍛煉承諾和鍛煉行為調(diào)節(jié)；3)角色認(rèn)同模型可以用于解釋、預(yù)測(cè)青少年的鍛煉行為；4)自我定義模型可以用于解釋、預(yù)測(cè)青少年的鍛煉行為；5)修正后的跨文化模型可以用于解釋、預(yù)測(cè)青少年的鍛煉行為；6)SDT可以用于解釋、預(yù)測(cè)青少年的鍛煉行為；RI顯著提高了SDT對(duì)青少年鍛煉行為的解釋力；7)與自我定義模型、修正后的跨文化模型和SDT-RI模型比較,角色認(rèn)同模型對(duì)角色水平上的認(rèn)同和鍛煉行為的解釋最為均衡,是較為理想的青少年鍛煉行為預(yù)測(cè)模型。
[Abstract]:Exercise identity refers to the degree to which an individual recognizes himself as an exerciser. The relationship between exercise identity and exercise behavior is the core content of exercise identity research. The existing research abroad often adds exercise identity as an independent variable to the traditional exercise behavior theory model or integrates it with other exercise psychological variables to establish the exercise behavior model because of neglecting the in-depth understanding of the exercise identity structure. The model is redundant. For more than 20 years, the study of exercise identity has failed to establish a hierarchical exercise behavior model within the framework of identity theory, which makes exercise identity often play a subordinate role in the research of predicting exercise behavior. Fail to give full play to the maximum value of exercise identity. Starting from the components of exercise identity, this study reintegrated the structure of EIS and AIQ, and used the theory of identity construction process and PASDM development thought of Kendzierski and others to construct the model of exercise role identity. To investigate the relationship between role identity and trait identity in the field of exercise. In order to avoid the "gap" between intention and behavior in the construction of exercise behavior model, Prior to the construction of the exercise behavior model, this study tested the explanatory power of the exercise identification variables to exercise behavior, examined the exercise identification variables, and the exercise self-definition. The individual predictive effect and relative predictive value of exercise commitment and exercise behavior regulation laid a foundation for the establishment of a good predictive model for adolescent exercise behavior. Based on the recognition that role identity is the best predictor of exercise behavior, this study further explored the model of adolescent exercise behavior based on role identity. In order to investigate the predictive value of role identity model on exercise behavior, this study revised and constructed several models, including self-definition model, modified cross-cultural model SDT model and SDT-RI model. The role identity model and the self-definition model are the exercise behavior models constructed within the framework of identity theory. The former embodies the interdependent self-concept. The latter embodies the independent self-view SDT model is the traditional exercise behavior model and the modified cross-cultural model is the integration model. Finally, according to the comparison results, the optimal exercise behavior prediction model is established. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) the model of adolescent exercise role identity is an acceptable analytical framework. (2) the individual and relative predictive effects of role identity on adolescent exercise behavior are greater than those of trait identity variables, and exercise self-definition. The role identification model can be used to explain, the self-definition model to predict the exercise behavior of adolescents can be used to explain, and the modified cross-cultural model can be used to explain the exercise behavior of adolescents. Predicting the exercise behavior of adolescents can be used to explain it. Predicting the exercise behavior of adolescents can significantly improve the explanatory power of SDT to adolescent exercise behavior. (7) compared with self-definition model, modified cross-cultural model and SDT-RI model, the prediction of exercise behavior of adolescents can be explained by SDT. Role identity model is the most balanced explanation of identity and exercise behavior at role level, and it is an ideal prediction model for adolescent exercise behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G804.8
，

本文編號(hào)：1882268