“屏蔽視頻廣告”的經(jīng)濟(jì)法思考
[Abstract]:In recent years, blocking video advertising disputes occurred frequently, blocking video advertising behavior in China's Internet industry has been controversial. In recent years, competition disputes in the Internet field are more difficult to characterize than traditional competition cases. In the current judicial practice in China, judicial organs generally hold that blocking video advertising violates the "business ethics" and the "principle of good faith" in the general provisions of the Anti-unfair Competition Law. More inclined to protect video site operators of the inherent business model and vested interests. However, China's anti-unfair competition law is not a simple protection of commercial interests, to protect the interests of market operators, consumers' interests, and social public interests all belong to its legislative purpose. Therefore, in judicial practice, we should weigh and consider the commercial interests of advertising software operators, the freedom of competition and the rights and interests of consumers. From the perspective of proportionality principle, this paper examines the legitimacy of competition behavior and the protection of consumers' right to self-choice, and holds that the blocking of video advertising acts conforms to the appropriateness of the proportionality principle, the necessity and the narrow sense of proportion principle, and three sub-principles, namely, the principle of proportionality. The behavior is within the scope of competition, while protecting the freedom of market competition without seriously threatening the commercial interests of video sites. Moreover, it is concluded that blocking video advertising is legitimate, reflects the respect for consumers' right to self-choice in Internet services, and provides the possibility for consumers to improve their browsing experience and conforms to the requirements of consumer rights and interests protection law. At the same time, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the construction of a new system and model based on consumers' right of choice, in order to realize the win-win results of the commercial value and consumers' interests of video websites.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D922.294
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 黃武雙;劉建臣;;中美屏蔽網(wǎng)頁(yè)廣告行為法律規(guī)制比較[J];競(jìng)爭(zhēng)政策研究;2015年01期
2 薛軍;;質(zhì)疑“非公益必要不干擾原則”[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年Z1期
3 黃勇;;論互聯(lián)網(wǎng)不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的“新邊界”[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年Z1期
4 石必勝;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)糾紛裁判規(guī)則的激勵(lì)分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年10期
5 張今;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)新型不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的類型及認(rèn)定[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期
6 石必勝;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的非公益必要不干擾原則 兼評(píng)百度訴360插標(biāo)和修改搜索提示詞不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)糾紛案[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年04期
7 呂加斌;;傲游廣告快進(jìn)引熱議——用戶體驗(yàn)or客戶利益?[J];市場(chǎng)w,
本文編號(hào):2444639
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2444639.html