【摘要】：十八大以來,以習(xí)近平為首的黨中央治國理政新理念新思想新戰(zhàn)略為基層社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新指明了方向。街道作為基層政府的派出機(jī)關(guān),它既是政府行政權(quán)力體系的一部分,又是社會(huì)治理體系的重要組成部分。街道治理是社會(huì)治理的重心,街道體制創(chuàng)新是社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型的根本性問題。當(dāng)前,我國社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)向現(xiàn)代化變遷的轉(zhuǎn)型過程中,政府職能轉(zhuǎn)移逐步制度化,城鄉(xiāng)社會(huì)組織不斷發(fā)展;街道改革逐步多元化,社區(qū)治理不斷創(chuàng)新;公共服務(wù)均等化,供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革不斷深入;治理手段不斷技術(shù)化,現(xiàn)代社會(huì)治理理論不斷深入發(fā)展。因此,在社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新語境下,街道治理所追求的終極目標(biāo)是社區(qū)公共服務(wù)的共建共享,街道職能回歸與重新定位有其現(xiàn)實(shí)需求。在“管理”向“治理”轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展過程中,街道職能轉(zhuǎn)移與服務(wù)管理方式創(chuàng)新正逐步由由單一管理向多元服務(wù)、由政社不分向政社分開、由全面覆蓋向突出重點(diǎn)、由機(jī)構(gòu)臃腫向有效精簡的趨勢發(fā)展。同時(shí),在街道的行政性與社會(huì)性雙重屬性驅(qū)動(dòng)下,各地圍繞街道治理創(chuàng)新展開了豐富實(shí)踐,形成了“街道政府化”、“撤銷街道辦”、“虛區(qū)實(shí)街”和“強(qiáng)化街道職能”四種典型發(fā)展模式。就各地開展的具體實(shí)踐活動(dòng)而言,各地探索主要是圍繞多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)化治理、樞紐型信息化建構(gòu)、整體性扁平化改革、全方位精準(zhǔn)化服務(wù)以及賦權(quán)式組織化協(xié)同等方式進(jìn)行,在促進(jìn)多元民主協(xié)商、驅(qū)動(dòng)服務(wù)流程再造、強(qiáng)化社區(qū)自治功能、提升服務(wù)管理能力和拓寬政社互動(dòng)空間等方面取得了顯著成效。然而,從街道職能轉(zhuǎn)移的合法性基礎(chǔ)、街道治理創(chuàng)新的社會(huì)期待和社區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)向等街道治理轉(zhuǎn)型的結(jié)構(gòu)性條件來看,街道職能轉(zhuǎn)移與服務(wù)管理創(chuàng)新在法治化、制度化和信息化建設(shè)方面還存在不足。而街道治理中存在的問題將是不斷推動(dòng)治理機(jī)制創(chuàng)新的強(qiáng)大推動(dòng)力,梳理街道服務(wù)管理體制改革變遷歷史、探索街道治理的內(nèi)在邏輯、總結(jié)街道治理改革創(chuàng)新模式,對于推動(dòng)街道治理創(chuàng)新,回應(yīng)社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新的發(fā)展需求,響應(yīng)中央和地方進(jìn)行社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新的號召,為國家治理體系和治理能力的現(xiàn)代化探索現(xiàn)實(shí)路徑具有重要意義。
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC Central Committee, the Party Central Committee's new ideas and new strategies have pointed out the direction of social governance innovation at the grass-roots level. As the dispatch organ of grass-roots government, street is not only a part of government administrative power system, but also an important part of social governance system. Street governance is the focus of social governance, and the innovation of street system is the fundamental problem in the modernization of social structure. At present, in the process of transformation from social structure to modernization, the transfer of government functions is gradually institutionalized, the social organizations in urban and rural areas continue to develop, the street reform is gradually diversified, and the community governance is constantly innovated. The equalization of public services, the deepening of supply-side structural reform, the continuous technological development of governance means, and the deepening development of modern social governance theory. Therefore, in the context of social governance innovation, the ultimate goal of street governance is the co-construction and sharing of community public services. In the process of transition from "management" to "governance", the transformation of street functions and the innovation of service management methods are gradually changing from single management to pluralistic service, from government to society, from comprehensive coverage to emphases. The trend from bloated organizations to efficient streamlining. At the same time, driven by the dual attributes of administration and sociality of the street, various localities have carried out rich practices around the street governance innovation, forming "street governmentalization" and "abolishing the street office". There are four typical development models of "virtual district real street" and "strengthening street function". As far as the specific practical activities carried out by various localities are concerned, local exploration is mainly carried out by means of multi-center networked governance, hub information construction, overall flat reform, all-directional precision service, and organization and coordination of empowerment, and so on. It has achieved remarkable results in promoting pluralistic democratic negotiation, driving service process reengineering, strengthening the function of community autonomy, enhancing service management ability and broadening the interaction space between government and society. However, from the legal basis of street function transfer, the social expectation of street governance innovation and the structural conditions of street governance transformation such as community transformation, street function transfer and service management innovation are governed by law. There are still deficiencies in institutionalization and information construction. The existing problems in street governance will be a powerful driving force to continuously promote the innovation of governance mechanism, comb the history of the reform and change of street service management system, explore the inherent logic of street governance, sum up the innovative mode of street governance reform. It is of great significance to promote the innovation of street governance, to respond to the development demand of social governance innovation, to respond to the call of central and local governments to innovate in social governance, and to explore the realistic path for the modernization of national governance system and governance ability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉冰;;精準(zhǔn)化服務(wù) 精細(xì)化治理——探索“全響應(yīng)”網(wǎng)格化社會(huì)治理新模式[J];社會(huì)治理;2016年03期

2 陳榮卓;申魯菁;;我國城市社區(qū)公共服務(wù)創(chuàng)新:地方經(jīng)驗(yàn)與發(fā)展趨勢[J];當(dāng)代世界社會(huì)主義問題;2016年01期

3 吳曉霞;;當(dāng)代中國城市基層治理的歷史演進(jìn)[J];當(dāng)代中國史研究;2016年02期

4 袁方成;羅家為;;十八大以來城鄉(xiāng)基層治理的新方向、新格局與新路徑[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2016年01期

5 王慶明;;城市治理轉(zhuǎn)型與基層權(quán)力重組——以沈陽街道辦改革為例[J];人文雜志;2015年08期

6 李立國;;創(chuàng)新社會(huì)治理體制[J];求是;2013年24期

7 陳榮卓;陳鵬;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化背景下現(xiàn)代農(nóng)村社會(huì)組織管理體制構(gòu)建研究[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2013年06期

8 田恒;;論城市基層治理分權(quán)化改革——基于撤銷街道辦事處的分析[J];中州學(xué)刊;2013年09期

9 敬海新;;基層政府社會(huì)管理扁平化機(jī)制建設(shè)對策[J];理論探討;2013年05期

10 劉明君;劉天旭;;精細(xì)化管理與基層政府治理創(chuàng)新——以桃園模式為例[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 何海兵;;街道體制改革的路徑與方向[N];文匯報(bào);2015年

，

本文編號：2331835