股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-26 14:15
【摘要】：伴隨著我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展而壯大起來,公司已經(jīng)成為社會經(jīng)濟(jì)生活最重要的主體。但是,在公司發(fā)展歷程中,由于市場規(guī)制、法制完善、投資理念等等因素的影響,在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)股東任意侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)等種種不利于公司健康發(fā)展的問題。雖然近些年來對公司法的研究專著頗多,但是關(guān)于股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化方面的研究卻頗少,更多是集中在新公司法背景下抽逃出資罪去罪化的爭議,而鮮少有學(xué)者從事關(guān)于股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)其他相關(guān)犯罪如職務(wù)侵占罪、挪用資金罪去罪化的研究,其中還夾雜著一些混沌不清的觀點(diǎn)、只言片語的解釋、以訛傳訛的謬論,三這不僅于學(xué)術(shù)有害,而且誤導(dǎo)著刑法實(shí)踐。在公司法實(shí)務(wù)上,股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)的現(xiàn)象非常普遍。在司法實(shí)踐中,盡管入罪的并非常態(tài),但是囿于認(rèn)知所限,同案不同判的現(xiàn)象也時(shí)有發(fā)生,筆者搜集了許多有關(guān)公司方面的犯罪案例,就發(fā)現(xiàn)了這一問題。有很多的刑事公訴書和判決書,直接將在商法領(lǐng)域使用的公司理論直接套用到刑事訴訟中。民事糾紛和刑事犯罪隨著立法、司法環(huán)境的變化也逐漸產(chǎn)生了更加復(fù)雜、更加疑難、相互交錯(cuò)的趨勢,許多關(guān)于刑事犯罪和民事糾紛之間的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別方面的實(shí)務(wù)問題急需解決。橘生淮南則為橘,生于淮北則為枳,筆者有感于民法和刑法在財(cái)產(chǎn)性權(quán)益保護(hù)方面的差異性、刑法當(dāng)中是否可以直接移植公司法的理論等問題,深入研究了股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪去罪化的問題。同時(shí),在股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)的糾紛解決中,傳統(tǒng)的解決之道常常偏重于追究股東的刑事責(zé)任和行政責(zé)任,往往忽視民事責(zé)任。刑罰資源是有限的,而刑法打擊的成本卻很高。這必然決定了刑法成為權(quán)益保護(hù)的最后手段。就必然存在如何以最小的刑法成本投入來實(shí)現(xiàn)刑法資源分配的最佳化,這也是刑法領(lǐng)域經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的理論和方法應(yīng)用于的必然。筆者闡述了股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化后的責(zé)任構(gòu)建。本文共分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分引言,介紹了論題研究的背景和意義,簡述了文章的主要內(nèi)容和研究方法。第二部分簡述了股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的立法司法現(xiàn)狀和以及理論界關(guān)于股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化的研究現(xiàn)狀。第三部分分析了股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化的必要性。主要刑法的謙抑性、民法和刑法對公司財(cái)產(chǎn)保護(hù)的差異性、刑罰經(jīng)濟(jì)性等方面進(jìn)行了闡述。第四部分分析了股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化后責(zé)任構(gòu)建問題。本文從民事、行政、刑法的多方位角度闡述股東侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)去罪化后的應(yīng)對。從侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)的股東對債權(quán)人、公司、其他誠信股東三個(gè)層次的責(zé)任著重闡述了民事責(zé)任的完善。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's socialist market economy, the company has become the most important subject of social and economic life. However, in the course of the development of the company, due to the influence of market regulation, perfect legal system, investment idea and other factors, the shareholders arbitrarily occupy the property of the company in practice and so on, which are not conducive to the healthy development of the company. Although there are many monographs on company law in recent years, there are few researches on decriminalization of shareholders' embezzlement of company property, and more on the controversy of decriminalization of the crime of escaping from capital contribution under the background of the new company law. However, few scholars are engaged in the research on other crimes related to shareholders' embezzlement of company property, such as the crime of duty embezzlement and the decriminalization of the crime of misappropriating funds. Among them, there are still some confused views, a few words and phrases, and a fallacy of falsehood. This is not only harmful to the academic, but also misleading the practice of criminal law. In the practice of company law, the phenomenon of shareholders encroaching on company property is very common. In judicial practice, although the incriminating is not normal, but limited by cognition, the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case also occurs from time to time. The author has collected a lot of criminal cases related to the company, and found this problem. There are many criminal indictments and judgments, which directly apply the corporate theory used in the field of commercial law to criminal proceedings. With the legislation of civil disputes and criminal offences, the changes in the judicial environment have gradually produced a trend of more complex, more difficult and interlaced. Many practical problems concerning the connection and distinction between criminal offences and civil disputes need to be solved urgently. Orange student Huainan is orange, born in Huaibei is trifoliate orange. The author feels the difference between civil law and criminal law in the protection of property rights and interests, whether the theory of company law can be directly transplanted in criminal law and so on. The problem of decriminalization of the crime of shareholder embezzlement of company property is studied in depth. At the same time, in the dispute resolution of shareholders' encroachment on the company's property, the traditional solution often emphasizes on investigating the shareholders' criminal responsibility and administrative responsibility, and often neglects civil liability. The penalty resource is limited, but the cost of the criminal law attack is very high. This will inevitably determine the criminal law as the last resort for the protection of rights and interests. It is inevitable that how to optimize the allocation of criminal law resources with the minimum cost of criminal law, which is the necessity of the theory and method of economics in criminal law field. The author expounds the construction of the liability after the shareholders' embezzlement of the company's property is decriminalized. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the background and significance of the research, and describes the main contents and research methods. The second part briefly describes the legislative and judicial status of shareholders' embezzlement of corporate property and the research status of the decriminalization of shareholders' embezzlement of corporate property in the theoretical circle. The third part analyzes the necessity of decriminalization of shareholders'embezzlement of company property. The modesty of the main criminal law, the difference between the civil law and the criminal law to the company property protection, the penalty economy and so on are expounded. The fourth part analyzes the problem of liability construction after shareholder embezzlement of company property. In this paper, from the civil, administrative, criminal law from the perspective of the shareholders after the decriminalization of corporate property. This paper expounds the perfection of civil liability from the three levels of liability of shareholders who occupy the property of the company to creditors, companies and other honest shareholders.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2295995
[Abstract]:With the development of China's socialist market economy, the company has become the most important subject of social and economic life. However, in the course of the development of the company, due to the influence of market regulation, perfect legal system, investment idea and other factors, the shareholders arbitrarily occupy the property of the company in practice and so on, which are not conducive to the healthy development of the company. Although there are many monographs on company law in recent years, there are few researches on decriminalization of shareholders' embezzlement of company property, and more on the controversy of decriminalization of the crime of escaping from capital contribution under the background of the new company law. However, few scholars are engaged in the research on other crimes related to shareholders' embezzlement of company property, such as the crime of duty embezzlement and the decriminalization of the crime of misappropriating funds. Among them, there are still some confused views, a few words and phrases, and a fallacy of falsehood. This is not only harmful to the academic, but also misleading the practice of criminal law. In the practice of company law, the phenomenon of shareholders encroaching on company property is very common. In judicial practice, although the incriminating is not normal, but limited by cognition, the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case also occurs from time to time. The author has collected a lot of criminal cases related to the company, and found this problem. There are many criminal indictments and judgments, which directly apply the corporate theory used in the field of commercial law to criminal proceedings. With the legislation of civil disputes and criminal offences, the changes in the judicial environment have gradually produced a trend of more complex, more difficult and interlaced. Many practical problems concerning the connection and distinction between criminal offences and civil disputes need to be solved urgently. Orange student Huainan is orange, born in Huaibei is trifoliate orange. The author feels the difference between civil law and criminal law in the protection of property rights and interests, whether the theory of company law can be directly transplanted in criminal law and so on. The problem of decriminalization of the crime of shareholder embezzlement of company property is studied in depth. At the same time, in the dispute resolution of shareholders' encroachment on the company's property, the traditional solution often emphasizes on investigating the shareholders' criminal responsibility and administrative responsibility, and often neglects civil liability. The penalty resource is limited, but the cost of the criminal law attack is very high. This will inevitably determine the criminal law as the last resort for the protection of rights and interests. It is inevitable that how to optimize the allocation of criminal law resources with the minimum cost of criminal law, which is the necessity of the theory and method of economics in criminal law field. The author expounds the construction of the liability after the shareholders' embezzlement of the company's property is decriminalized. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the background and significance of the research, and describes the main contents and research methods. The second part briefly describes the legislative and judicial status of shareholders' embezzlement of corporate property and the research status of the decriminalization of shareholders' embezzlement of corporate property in the theoretical circle. The third part analyzes the necessity of decriminalization of shareholders'embezzlement of company property. The modesty of the main criminal law, the difference between the civil law and the criminal law to the company property protection, the penalty economy and so on are expounded. The fourth part analyzes the problem of liability construction after shareholder embezzlement of company property. In this paper, from the civil, administrative, criminal law from the perspective of the shareholders after the decriminalization of corporate property. This paper expounds the perfection of civil liability from the three levels of liability of shareholders who occupy the property of the company to creditors, companies and other honest shareholders.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 趙旭東;;資本制度變革下的資本法律責(zé)任——公司法修改的理性解讀[J];法學(xué)研究;2014年05期
2 袁魁;;資本制度改革的刑法匹配——論抽逃出資罪保留的必要性及其重構(gòu)[J];時(shí)代金融;2014年21期
3 盧建平;;公司注冊門檻降低對刑法的挑戰(zhàn)——兼論市場經(jīng)濟(jì)格局中的刑法謙抑[J];法治研究;2014年01期
4 樊云慧;;從“抽逃出資”到“侵占公司財(cái)產(chǎn)”:一個(gè)概念的厘清——以公司注冊資本登記制度改革為切入點(diǎn)[J];法商研究;2014年01期
5 張保華;;分配概念解析——兼評《公司法司法解釋(三)》中的抽逃出資[J];政治與法律;2011年08期
6 趙旭東;從資本信用到資產(chǎn)信用[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 田丹;高利轉(zhuǎn)貸行為去罪化分析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年
2 蒙瑞;中國上市公司控制股東侵占公司資產(chǎn)：問題與對策[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年
，本文編號：2295995
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2295995.html
最近更新
教材專著
