【摘要】：財(cái)物是刑法中的基礎(chǔ)性概念,作為一類非常重要的犯罪對象,財(cái)物的界定關(guān)系到犯罪的認(rèn)定和刑罰的適用。侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪和賄賂犯罪都是古老的犯罪,我國刑法歷來規(guī)定侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)的犯罪對象是財(cái)物,賄賂以財(cái)物為中介實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力的交易。在刑法中界定財(cái)物可以幫助我們認(rèn)識犯罪的本質(zhì),判斷刑法所保護(hù)的社會(huì)關(guān)系的性質(zhì)及其受損程度。該文共有以下幾個(gè)部分:第一個(gè)部分介紹了刑法中財(cái)物的概念和在刑法中界定財(cái)物的意義所在。第二個(gè)部分歸納了刑法中財(cái)物的特征和性質(zhì)。該部分通過梳理司法機(jī)關(guān)在具體司法實(shí)踐中對財(cái)物的不同認(rèn)定方法,力求歸納出刑法中財(cái)物的三個(gè)基本特征:第一,財(cái)物應(yīng)具有價(jià)值,并且這種價(jià)值應(yīng)當(dāng)同經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的價(jià)值概念相一致。其次,財(cái)物應(yīng)可為人力控制,人力不僅可以占有和支配該財(cái)物,而且可以通過人力實(shí)現(xiàn)財(cái)物的價(jià)值。第三,財(cái)物應(yīng)是客觀存在的,觀念的擬制物不是財(cái)物。第三部分詳細(xì)分析了刑法中的部分有體財(cái)物在不同案件中所體現(xiàn)出的不同司法觀點(diǎn),如來源是否合法對認(rèn)定財(cái)物的影響,違禁物是否納入刑法中財(cái)物的范疇,提貨憑證的不同界定主張等等問題。該文的第四部分分析了在何種情況下可以將財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益和虛擬財(cái)物納入刑法保護(hù)范疇。
[Abstract]:Property is a basic concept in criminal law. As a very important object of crime, the definition of property is related to the identification of crime and the application of penalty. Crime of infringing property and crime of bribery are ancient crimes. Our criminal law has always stipulated that the object of crime of infringing property is property, and bribery takes property as intermediary to realize the transaction of power. Defining property in criminal law can help us understand the nature of crime and judge the nature and damage of social relations protected by criminal law. This paper consists of the following parts: the first part introduces the concept of property in criminal law and the meaning of defining property in criminal law. The second part summarizes the characteristics and nature of property in criminal law. This part tries to sum up three basic characteristics of property in criminal law by combing the different methods of identifying property in specific judicial practice: first, property should have value. And this value should be consistent with the concept of value in economics. Secondly, property should be controlled by manpower, who can not only possess and dispose the property, but also realize the value of property by manpower. Third, the property should be objective existence, the idea fictitious thing is not the property. The third part of the detailed analysis of some of the criminal law embodied in different cases of physical property in different judicial views, such as whether the source of the legal impact on the identification of property, prohibited property into the scope of the criminal law. Claim of different definition of receipt of goods, and so on. The fourth part of this paper analyzes the circumstances under which property interests and virtual property can be brought into the scope of criminal law protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 馬一德;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)繼承問題探析[J];法商研究;2013年05期

2 陳青青;;《1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》中私有財(cái)產(chǎn)概念簡析[J];西安文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

3 張建文;朱帥;;撿到已知密碼的信用卡在自動(dòng)取款機(jī)上取款行為的定性[J];人民司法;2008年12期

，

本文編號：2146927