發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-28 09:06

  本文選題：法治思維 + 政府管理方式�。� 參考：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：黨中央和習(xí)近平總書記連續(xù)發(fā)出關(guān)于“法治思維”的倡導(dǎo),要求把法治思維作為治國理政的新理念、新思路;當(dāng)下中國深刻的社會(huì)背景也表明政府管理方式亟待轉(zhuǎn)變。因此,法治思維對(duì)于轉(zhuǎn)變政府管理方式具有戰(zhàn)略性意義。當(dāng)前的政策形勢(shì)和現(xiàn)實(shí)需要都要求運(yùn)用法治思維指導(dǎo)我國政府管理方式的轉(zhuǎn)變。解析“法治思維”,對(duì)于全面把握研究主題是不可或缺的。通過對(duì)文獻(xiàn)的歸納、比較、分析等,綜合黨中央及國家領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人講話中的表述,能夠清晰、明確的解讀出法治思維的內(nèi)涵和價(jià)值指向。法治思維是以法治為基本理念,以法律為行為依據(jù)的思維方式。在政府管理語境中,法治思維主要是一種倡導(dǎo)權(quán)力有限、權(quán)利本位、正當(dāng)程序和柔性行政的思維方式。在法治思維視角下,結(jié)合社會(huì)上一些具體的、典型的、具有社會(huì)影響力的事例來說明我國政府管理方式存在的問題。以權(quán)力為本位、政府為中心的命令式、強(qiáng)制式的政府管理方式存在的問題主要表現(xiàn)為:剛性執(zhí)法、行政權(quán)力異化、漠視公民權(quán)利、蔑視法律制度、輕視程序。造成政府管理方式存在上述問題的原因主要包括:其一是管理觀念的滯后�！叭酥巍�、“管制”、“權(quán)力本位”等傳統(tǒng)政府管理理念仍然存在并影響著部分管理者的思維方式和行為方式;其二是行政權(quán)力約束不足。權(quán)力監(jiān)督的不到位和責(zé)任追究力度的不足導(dǎo)致權(quán)力約束不足、問責(zé)成本過低,沒有形成制約和規(guī)范權(quán)力正確行使的震懾力量;其三是法律程序的不完善。行政程序不統(tǒng)一,且規(guī)范性、操作性不高;第四是法律權(quán)威的缺失。傳統(tǒng)中國文化觀念的影響以及權(quán)力的膨脹濫用破壞了法律的權(quán)威,社會(huì)沒有形成一種崇尚法律、敬仰法律的風(fēng)氣;第五是行政主體法治素養(yǎng)的不足。行政主體缺少法治思維及運(yùn)用法治思維解決糾紛、化解矛盾的能力,沒有形成法治信仰和正確的權(quán)力觀。從目前政府管理方式存在的問題及問題產(chǎn)生原因來看,在法治思維視角下轉(zhuǎn)變政府管理方式就是要從縱容權(quán)力向限制權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)變、從權(quán)力本位向權(quán)利本位轉(zhuǎn)變、從重結(jié)果向重程序轉(zhuǎn)變、從剛性行政向柔性行政轉(zhuǎn)變。在政府管理過程中增加講法說理的成分,引入?yún)f(xié)商、對(duì)話、申辯等程序,切實(shí)確保政府權(quán)力合理合法運(yùn)行,保障公民權(quán)利。法治思維視角下政府管理方式轉(zhuǎn)變的路徑主要從更新政府管理理念、提升行政主體法治素養(yǎng)、完善法律程序設(shè)計(jì)、限制政府權(quán)力、保障公民合法權(quán)利、引入柔性管理手段等幾方面著手。
[Abstract]:The Central Committee of the party and general secretary Xi Jinping have issued a continuous promotion of the "thinking of the rule of law", which requires the rule of law thinking as a new idea and a new idea. The profound social background in China also shows that the government management mode needs to be changed. Therefore, the rule of law is of strategic significance to the transformation of government administration mode. Both the situation and the actual needs require the use of the rule of law to guide the transformation of our government's management mode. The analysis of the "rule of law thinking" is indispensable to the overall grasp of the subject of the study. Through the induction, comparison and analysis of the literature, the expression in the speech of the Party Central and state leaders can clearly and clearly interpret the thinking of the rule of law. In the context of government management, the thinking of the rule of law is mainly a thinking mode of advocating limited power, right standard, due process and flexible administration in the perspective of the rule of law, combining with some specific and typical society in the perspective of the rule of law. Examples of social influence to illustrate the existing problems of government management in our country. The main problems of the government as the standard, the government as the central command and the compulsory government management are as follows: rigid law enforcement, dissimilation of administrative power, disregard of civil rights, contempt of legal system and disregard of procedures. The main reasons for the above problems include: one is the lag of the management concept. The traditional government management ideas such as "rule of man", "control" and "power standard" still exist and affect the thinking mode and behavior mode of some managers; the other is the lack of administrative power constraints, the inadequacy of power supervision and the insufficiency of accountability. It leads to insufficient power constraints, low accountability costs and no deterrent force to restrict and regulate the right exercise of power; third, the legal procedure is not perfect. The administrative procedures are not unified, and the legal authority is not high; fourth is the lack of legal authority. The influence of the traditional Chinese cultural concept and the abuse of power's expansion have destroyed the law. Authority, the society does not form a custom of advocating law and admired the law; fifth is the deficiency of the administrative subject rule of law. The administrative subject lacks the rule of law thinking and the use of the rule of law to solve the disputes, dissolves the contradiction, and does not form the belief of the rule of law and the right view of power. From the problems and problems existing in the current government management mode, the problems and problems are produced. The reason is that the transformation of government management mode from the perspective of rule of law is to change the way of government management from power to limited power, from power standard to right standard, from heavy result to reprocedure, from rigid administration to flexible administration. In the process of government management, it is necessary to increase the principles of speaking, and introduce the procedures of negotiation, dialogue and pleading. In order to ensure the rational and legitimate operation of government power and guarantee the rights of citizens, the path of the transformation of government management mode from the perspective of rule of law is mainly to update the government management concept, improve the legal accomplishment of the administrative subject, improve the design of the legal procedure, restrict the power of the government, guarantee the right of the civil law, and introduce the flexible management means.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 寧立成;鄧超;;法治思維與法治中國建設(shè)[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年06期

2 黃麗云;;論法治思維的向度、困境與常態(tài)化[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2016年01期

3 馮彥君;;關(guān)于“法律信仰”的遐思與追問[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

4 陳金釗;宋保振;;法治國家、法治政府與法治社會(huì)的意義闡釋——以法治為修辭改變思維方式[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2015年05期

5 張國祺;;論法治思維與依法治國[J];成都工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

6 閆雨;劉小強(qiáng);;依法行政:政府創(chuàng)新管理的路徑策略[J];創(chuàng)新;2015年02期

7 李云霖;胡正昌;陳歡;;法治中國建設(shè)中的公務(wù)員法治思維[J];湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年01期

8 呂世倫;金若山;;法治思維探析[J];北方法學(xué);2015年01期

9 王敬波;;法治思維的邏輯起點(diǎn)[J];新疆師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

10 彭中禮;;論領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部行政決策中的法治思維[J];中國井岡山干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1946114