本文選題：政府信息 + 行政機(jī)關(guān)��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自《中華人民共和國政府信息公開條例》(以下簡稱《條例》)實(shí)施以來,司法實(shí)踐過程中,信息公開類案件逐漸增多,中國行政法學(xué)界對于“政府信息”這一概念的研究與討論有加無已。關(guān)于政府信息的定義,主要體現(xiàn)在《條例》的第二條規(guī)定中,通過《條例》第二條規(guī)定可以看出,政府信息的構(gòu)包含,政府信息的產(chǎn)生主體、履行職責(zé)的方式、制作或者獲取的性質(zhì)、以一定形式記錄與保存載體的形式四方面的因素,這四點(diǎn)是司法實(shí)踐中界定政府信息關(guān)鍵因素,是信息公開制度理論架構(gòu)建立的基礎(chǔ)。該文重點(diǎn)研究對于政府信息這一基本概念構(gòu)成與認(rèn)定方式,構(gòu)建政府信息理論研究框架,該文章從“政府信息”四方面逐一剖析,分析和界定每一構(gòu)成部分所應(yīng)有的內(nèi)涵及外延,對信息產(chǎn)生主體、信息產(chǎn)生方式、信息的產(chǎn)生性質(zhì)、信息的存在形式四個關(guān)鍵要素逐一進(jìn)行研究。首先,對政府信息公開義務(wù)主體,即《條例》規(guī)定的義務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)的主要類型進(jìn)行界定。研究信息公開義務(wù)主體,需要通過分析信息的產(chǎn)生主體,并結(jié)合《條例》具體規(guī)定,逐一分析政府信息的制作主體,行政機(jī)關(guān)、法律法規(guī)授權(quán)的組織、國有公共企事業(yè)單位三類。為第三部分深入分析公開義務(wù)主體交叉問題,提供一個討論平臺。其次,研究信息產(chǎn)生的主體問題,即行政機(jī)關(guān)履行職責(zé)的界定,該章主要提出我國行政法學(xué)界對“履行職責(zé)”概念的不同理解,以及對主要履行職責(zé)的類型進(jìn)行歸納分析。此外,對行政機(jī)關(guān)履行職責(zé)中,爭議較大三個問題逐一研究,分別是內(nèi)部信息、過程性信息與刑事執(zhí)法信息,通過相關(guān)案例與相關(guān)學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn),進(jìn)行比較分析后提出文章觀點(diǎn)。再次,研究政府信息的產(chǎn)生方式,對政府信息制作與獲取進(jìn)行界定,該章涉及對于履行職責(zé)過程中制作與獲取的理解,分別將制作與獲取兩個概念分別討論,結(jié)合有關(guān)法律法規(guī)對制作與獲取概念分別進(jìn)行界定。文章通過對,政府信息產(chǎn)生性質(zhì)莫衷一是的問題分析,如多機(jī)關(guān)共同制作信息、既有制作機(jī)關(guān)又有保存機(jī)關(guān)、保存機(jī)關(guān)從行政相對人手中獲取的其他機(jī)關(guān)制作的政府信息,分別結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐過程中的代表性案例進(jìn)行分析,并得出該文觀點(diǎn)。最后,對政府信息的存在形式進(jìn)行研究,界定記錄、保存載體,關(guān)鍵對以一定形式記錄、保存的理解,對基本概念的分析,通過正反兩方面進(jìn)行比較,明確一定形式這一概念的界限,得出信息存在形式的客觀條件。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the "regulations of the Government of the people's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as "the regulations"), in the course of judicial practice, the number of cases of information disclosure has gradually increased. The concept of "government information" has been studied and discussed in the field of administrative law in China. With regard to the definition of government information, it is mainly reflected in the second provision of the regulations. Through the provisions of Article 2 of the regulations, it can be seen that the construction of government information contains, the main body of government information is produced, and the way in which it performs its duties, The nature of production or acquisition and the form of record and preservation carrier in a certain form are the four factors which are the key factors of defining government information in judicial practice and the foundation of the theoretical framework of information disclosure system. This paper focuses on the formation and identification of the basic concept of government information, and constructs the theoretical framework of government information, which is analyzed from the four aspects of "government information" one by one. This paper analyzes and defines the connotation and extension of each component, and studies the four key elements one by one: the main body of information generation, the way of information generation, the nature of information generation and the form of existence of information. First of all, define the main types of government information disclosure obligation subject, that is, the obligation organization stipulated by regulations. In order to study the subject of information disclosure obligation, we need to analyze the main body of information production, administrative organs and organizations authorized by laws and regulations one by one in combination with the specific provisions of the regulations. There are three types of state-owned public enterprises and institutions. For the third part of the in-depth analysis of the subject of public obligations cross-issue, to provide a discussion platform. Secondly, the paper studies the subject of information production, that is, the definition of administrative organ's performing duty. This chapter mainly puts forward the different understanding of the concept of "performing duty" in the field of administrative law in our country, as well as the inductive analysis of the type of main performing duty. In addition, the administrative organs in the performance of their duties, there are three controversial issues one by one, namely, internal information, process information and criminal law enforcement information, through the relevant cases and related academic views, after comparative analysis of the article point of view. Thirdly, it studies the way of government information generation, defines the production and acquisition of government information, which involves the understanding of making and obtaining in the process of performing duties, and discusses the two concepts of production and acquisition, respectively. Combined with relevant laws and regulations, the concept of production and acquisition are defined respectively. Through the analysis of the different nature of the government information, such as the joint production of information by many organs, the government information produced by other organs obtained from the administrative counterpart, both the production organ and the preservation organ, Combined with the judicial practice of the representative case analysis, and draw the point of view. Finally, to study the existence form of government information, define the record, preserve the carrier, the key to a certain form of record, the understanding of preservation, the analysis of the basic concepts, through the positive and negative aspects of comparison, The definition of a certain form is defined and the objective conditions of the existence of information are obtained.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 程琥;;《政府信息公開條例》的修改[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

2 孟鴻志;張_g;;政府信息公開主體的重構(gòu)——以“三張清單”制度為路徑[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2016年01期

3 梁藝;;政府信息公開中“內(nèi)部管理信息”的判定[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2015年01期

4 王軍;;“政府信息”的司法認(rèn)定——基于86件判決的分析[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

5 朱芒;;公共企事業(yè)單位應(yīng)如何信息公開[J];中國法學(xué);2013年02期

6 劉波;;政府信息概念理解上的三個問題[J];中國行政管理;2012年08期

7 郭華;;行政執(zhí)法與刑事司法銜接機(jī)制的立法問題研究——以公安機(jī)關(guān)的經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪偵查為中心[J];犯罪研究;2009年01期

8 滕恩榮;;對政府信息保存機(jī)關(guān)公開原則的界定與理解[J];中國審判;2015年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉行;;政府信息：“誰保存，，誰公開”行得通嗎？[N];中國國土資源報(bào);2016年

本文編號：1880314