本文選題：司法裁判 + 村務(wù)公開(kāi)�。� 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：村務(wù)公開(kāi)是我國(guó)村委會(huì)組織法規(guī)定的保障村民自治制度健康運(yùn)行的重要方式,是維護(hù)村民知情權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán)的必要途徑,是防止村民自治組織和村干部濫用權(quán)力、以權(quán)謀私的主要手段。在司法實(shí)踐中,由于村委會(huì)的行政主體地位尚未被法院廣泛認(rèn)可,村務(wù)公開(kāi)爭(zhēng)議發(fā)生后,村民不能直接以村委會(huì)為被告提起訴訟。而村委會(huì)組織法第三十一條規(guī)定當(dāng)村委會(huì)不及時(shí)公布或者不真實(shí)公布應(yīng)當(dāng)公布的事項(xiàng),村民可以向鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府或者縣級(jí)政府及有關(guān)主管部門(mén)反映,有關(guān)政府及管理部門(mén)應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行調(diào)查和核實(shí),責(zé)令依法公布。因此,目前村民請(qǐng)求法院解決村務(wù)公開(kāi)爭(zhēng)議的渠道是先申請(qǐng)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府或者縣級(jí)政府及有關(guān)主管部門(mén)進(jìn)行調(diào)查處理,當(dāng)有關(guān)政府或者主管部門(mén)不依法履行對(duì)村務(wù)公開(kāi)爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行調(diào)查處理職責(zé)時(shí),村民可以該行政機(jī)關(guān)為被告提起行政訴訟,此即基于村務(wù)公開(kāi)的行政訴訟。這種行政訴訟主要解決行政機(jī)關(guān)是否履行監(jiān)督村務(wù)公開(kāi)的職責(zé)的問(wèn)題以及村民與村民自治組織之間的村務(wù)公開(kāi)爭(zhēng)議。基于村務(wù)公開(kāi)的行政訴訟為村民的知情權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán)受到侵犯時(shí)提供了救濟(jì)渠道,然而其也存在諸多問(wèn)題。通過(guò)分析、歸納和總結(jié)我國(guó)法院的相關(guān)裁判文書(shū),其問(wèn)題主要表現(xiàn)在,一是相關(guān)法律對(duì)村務(wù)公開(kāi)規(guī)定不完善,法院對(duì)相同問(wèn)題與爭(zhēng)議的裁決存在不統(tǒng)一之處,不利于村民知情權(quán)的保障;二是法律規(guī)范沖突的解決機(jī)制缺位,法院適用違反上位法的規(guī)范時(shí)無(wú)法救濟(jì);三是法院不認(rèn)可村委會(huì)被告資格,使得村民尋求司法救濟(jì)過(guò)程復(fù)雜,增加了村民的訴訟負(fù)擔(dān)。最后在分析基于村務(wù)公開(kāi)的行政訴訟現(xiàn)存問(wèn)題的基礎(chǔ)上提出了完善建議,以期當(dāng)村務(wù)公開(kāi)爭(zhēng)議發(fā)生后,為村民知情權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán)的司法保障研究提供參考。
[Abstract]:The openness of village affairs is an important way to ensure the healthy operation of the villagers' autonomy system stipulated in the Organic Law of the Village Committee of our country. It is a necessary way to safeguard the villagers' right to know and supervise, and to prevent the villagers' autonomous organizations and village cadres from abusing their power. The main means of abuse of power for personal gain. In judicial practice, because the status of the administrative subject of the village committee has not been widely recognized by the court, villagers can not directly take the village committee as the defendant after the village affairs open dispute occurs. Article 31 of the Organic Law of the Village Committee stipulates that when the village committee fails to publish in a timely or untrue manner, the villagers may reflect the matter to the township government or the county government and the relevant competent departments. The relevant government and administrative departments shall carry out investigations and verification and order them to be promulgated in accordance with the law. Therefore, at present, the channel through which villagers request the court to resolve open disputes about village affairs is to first apply for the township government or county government and the relevant competent departments to investigate and handle the dispute. When the relevant government or competent department does not perform the duty of investigating and handling the open dispute of village affairs according to law, the villager may file administrative suit for the defendant, which is based on the administrative lawsuit of open village affairs. This kind of administrative lawsuit mainly solves the question whether the administrative organ performs the duty of supervising the village affairs open and the dispute between the villagers and the villagers' autonomous organization. Administrative litigation based on village affairs open provides relief channels for villagers' right to know and supervision when infringed, but there are many problems. Through the analysis, summarizes and summarizes our country's court related adjudication document, its question mainly manifests in: first, the related law to the village affairs public stipulation is not perfect, the court to the same question and the dispute ruling existence does not unify place, It is not conducive to the protection of villagers' right to know; the second is the absence of a mechanism for resolving conflicts between laws and norms, and the court cannot remedy the violation of the norms of the superior law; third, the court does not recognize the qualification of the village committee as a defendant, which makes the process of seeking judicial relief for villagers complicated. Increased the burden of litigation on the villagers. Finally, on the basis of analyzing the existing problems of administrative litigation based on village affairs publicity, the author puts forward some suggestions, in order to provide a reference for the study of the villagers' right to know and the judicial guarantee of supervision right after the village affairs open dispute.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D921.8

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周成林;;貫徹村委會(huì)組織法亟待解決的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];楚天主人;2002年11期

2 王世智;黃定美;;當(dāng)前要從三方面認(rèn)真執(zhí)行村委會(huì)組織法[J];楚天主人;2004年Z1期

3 ;村委會(huì)組織法有了新規(guī)定[J];農(nóng)家顧問(wèn);2010年12期

4 孫孝建;;村委會(huì)組織法修訂后的五大完善[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;2010年34期

5 姜力;;深入貫徹實(shí)施好村委會(huì)組織法[J];中國(guó)民政;2011年02期

6 李頌銀;;村民委員會(huì)組織法試行中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1990年05期

7 本刊編輯部;;要深入貫徹村委會(huì)組織法[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;1990年06期

8 袁天錫;;進(jìn)一步貫徹村委會(huì)組織法推動(dòng)村民自治[J];人大工作通訊;1996年15期

9 ;切實(shí)把村委會(huì)組織法貫徹好[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;1998年11期

10 ;村委會(huì)組織法給我撐了腰[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;1998年11期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 李保林　通訊員 鐘源 周麗;就村委會(huì)組織法進(jìn)行立法調(diào)研[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

2 全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)法制工作委員會(huì)副主任 闞珂;村委會(huì)組織法制定過(guò)程一波三折(上)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

3 全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)法制工作委員會(huì)副主任 闞珂;村委會(huì)組織法制定過(guò)程一波三折(下)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

4 本報(bào)記者 陳麗平;村委會(huì)組織法頒行十年即將“大修”[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

5 黃晏銘;村委會(huì)組織法實(shí)施十周年座談會(huì)在京舉行[N];中國(guó)特產(chǎn)報(bào);2008年

6 記者 吳林紅;王金山王三運(yùn)會(huì)見(jiàn)國(guó)家村委會(huì)組織法修訂調(diào)研組一行[N];安徽日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

7 記者 楊艷玲;州人大檢查組檢查“村委會(huì)組織法”實(shí)施情況[N];大理日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2009年

8 記者 劉延慶;村委會(huì)組織法修改調(diào)查報(bào)告出爐[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)報(bào);2010年

9 李寶庫(kù);村委會(huì)組織法：農(nóng)民民主權(quán)利的可靠保障[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2000年

10 記者 曹顯鈺;國(guó)家村委會(huì)組織法修訂調(diào)研組來(lái)皖[N];安徽日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李亞航;基于村務(wù)公開(kāi)的行政訴訟研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 付楊;論我國(guó)的行政訴訟政策[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

3 楊偉萍;行政訴訟交叉集中管轄制度研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年

4 王鳳嬌;政府信息公開(kāi)行政訴訟焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題探究[D];青島大學(xué);2017年

5 董曉U，

本文編號(hào)：1878444