本文選題：共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 權(quán)利行使規(guī)則的確定原則��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)是指兩個或兩個以上民事主體基于法定或約定的關(guān)系對同一對象依據(jù)法律規(guī)定所享有權(quán)利的共有。共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)可以基于兩個或兩個以上民事主體共同創(chuàng)作作品、對同一商標(biāo)提出共同申請、共同研發(fā)技術(shù)方案后共同申請專利、通過受讓、遺贈、繼承和承繼同一知識產(chǎn)權(quán)等以及約定對同一知識產(chǎn)權(quán)共有而產(chǎn)生。由于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對象的無體性以及公共利益性等特性,共有物權(quán)權(quán)利行使規(guī)則難以直接適用。基于共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的多主體性、權(quán)利的單一性等特性,并結(jié)合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)本身所固有的特性,共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的行使規(guī)則應(yīng)遵循的原則有:約定優(yōu)先、約定受限、法定補(bǔ)充以及防止權(quán)利沖突等四個原則。我國現(xiàn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)立法中,對共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的行使規(guī)則的規(guī)定,存在不契合共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行使規(guī)則的確定原則,應(yīng)該以共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的確定原則為基準(zhǔn)改進(jìn)具體的共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利行使規(guī)則。由于專利、商標(biāo)與著作權(quán)等權(quán)利的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)共性,應(yīng)該將該三種知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的共有權(quán)利行使規(guī)則統(tǒng)一調(diào)整為:約定優(yōu)先,但共有商標(biāo)權(quán)利行使的約定,不得導(dǎo)致消費(fèi)者混淆;沒有約定或約定不明時,共有人都有權(quán)自己行使權(quán)利與普通許可他人行使權(quán)利,普通許可他人行使權(quán)利所獲得利益應(yīng)該與其他共有人分配,分配按照共有人對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的各自份額進(jìn)行分配,無法確定共有份額的,平均分配。共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓、獨(dú)占許可與排他許可需要共有人協(xié)商一致予以決定,協(xié)商不成按照共有份額表決決定,沒有共有份額的約定,又不能協(xié)商一致的,共有人不得對轉(zhuǎn)讓共有的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)、對共有的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)進(jìn)行獨(dú)占許可與排他許可;共有人轉(zhuǎn)讓其共有份額的,其他共有人在同等條件下,享有優(yōu)先權(quán)。共有人欲放棄權(quán)利的經(jīng)通知其他共有人后即可,其所放棄的權(quán)益份額由其他共有人按其所占的權(quán)益份額分享,如未約定權(quán)益份額的由其他共有人平均享有。共有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)受到任何侵害時,各共有人均有權(quán)單獨(dú)提起訴訟,對于訴訟所獲賠償金,扣除訴訟成本后的可分配金額在各共有人之間按照各自享有的份額進(jìn)行分配,如各共有人未約定各自所享有的份額,則在各共有人之間進(jìn)行均等分配。共有人可放棄追責(zé)權(quán)利,放棄追責(zé)權(quán)利的共有人無權(quán)參與該次侵權(quán)訴訟獲得的賠償金的分配。為此,我國《專利法》、《商標(biāo)法》與《著作權(quán)法》相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的調(diào)整。
[Abstract]:Joint intellectual property rights refer to two or more civil subjects based on the legal or agreed relationship with the same object according to the legal provisions of the rights shared. A joint intellectual property right may be based on the joint creation of a work by two or more civil subjects, a joint application for the same trademark, a joint application for a patent after joint research and development of a technical scheme, and a joint application for a legacy through transfer, Inheritance and inheritance of the same intellectual property, etc., and the agreement to share the same intellectual property. Due to the characteristics of the object of intellectual property and public interest, it is difficult to directly apply the rules of exercise of common real right. Based on the characteristics of common intellectual property rights such as multi-subjectivity, singularity of rights, and combining the inherent characteristics of intellectual property rights, the rules governing the exercise of joint intellectual property rights should follow the following principles: agreement first, agreement limited, and so on. Legal supplement and prevention of conflict of rights four principles. In the current intellectual property legislation of our country, the rules for the exercise of joint intellectual property rights are not in accordance with the rules for the exercise of joint intellectual property rights. Specific rules for the exercise of joint intellectual property rights should be improved on the basis of the principle of the determination of joint intellectual property rights. Due to the common intellectual property rights of patent, trademark and copyright, the rules of exercise of common rights of these three kinds of intellectual property rights should be unified and adjusted as follows: agreement takes precedence, but the agreement on the exercise of common trademark rights should not lead to confusion among consumers; If there is no agreement or the agreement is unclear, the joint owners shall have the right to exercise their own rights and those of others to exercise their rights, and the benefits derived from the exercise of the rights by the ordinary licensees shall be distributed among the other co-owners, The distribution shall be according to the respective shares of the joint owners of intellectual property rights, and shall be equally distributed if there is no way to determine the common share. Where a joint intellectual property right is transferred, the exclusive license and exclusive license shall be decided by consensus by the co-owner, and no decision shall be reached through consultation in accordance with the common share, and there shall be no agreement on the common share, and there shall be no consensus through consensus, A joint owner may not license or license exclusive ownership of a joint intellectual property right; if a joint owner transfers its common share, the other joint owners shall enjoy priority under the same conditions. If a joint owner wishes to waive his rights, he may, after notice to the other joint owners, share the shares of the rights renounced by the other joint owners according to their share of the rights and interests, such as those which are not agreed upon by the other joint owners. In the event of any infringement of joint intellectual property rights, each joint owner shall have the right to initiate a separate action, and the distributable amount after deducting the costs of litigation shall be distributed among the co-owners according to their respective shares of the compensation received in the proceedings, If the co-owners do not agree on their respective shares, they are equally distributed among the co-owners. The joint owner may waive the right to pursue liability, and the joint owner who waives the right of liability has no right to participate in the distribution of compensation obtained in the tort lawsuit. Therefore, the relevant systems of Patent Law, Trademark Law and copyright Law in China are adjusted accordingly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳之榮;王智源;王輝;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)共有問題研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年12期

2 王東京;;商標(biāo)共有權(quán)行使規(guī)則構(gòu)建探討[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

3 孫敏潔;曹新明;;專利共有——交易與許可的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 趙姍姍;商標(biāo)權(quán)共有研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2015年

2 郭雨灑;著作權(quán)共有制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年

3 陳夢斯;專利權(quán)共有制度初探[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

4 王伴伴;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)共有制度研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2010年

5 王永青;著作權(quán)共有法律關(guān)系初探[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1861978