本文選題：刑事到案 + 權(quán)力擴(kuò)張��； 參考：《江西理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事到案是刑事訴訟中一個(gè)重要的環(huán)節(jié)。當(dāng)前,一方面犯罪案件不斷增多,打擊犯罪,維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的壓力不斷增大;另一方面侵害犯罪嫌疑人合法權(quán)益的情況屢禁不止,保障人權(quán)呼聲不斷,民眾權(quán)利意識(shí)和權(quán)利本位觀念不斷增強(qiáng)。打擊犯罪和保障人權(quán)處于一種相對(duì)緊張狀態(tài),而構(gòu)建科學(xué)合理的刑事到案制度有利于平衡打擊犯罪與保障人權(quán)之間的關(guān)系。本文將圍繞如何處理好二者之間的關(guān)系展開分析論述,從厘清刑事到案的內(nèi)涵與外延出發(fā),對(duì)刑事到案做一個(gè)系統(tǒng)性的解析,結(jié)合域外到案的經(jīng)驗(yàn)做法,提出解決我國(guó)當(dāng)前刑事到案存在問題的對(duì)策。本文除引言和結(jié)論外,正文共分為五章。第一章為刑事到案概述,包含兩個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容。第一個(gè)方面包括刑事到案的基本范疇;第二個(gè)方面包括我國(guó)及外國(guó)刑事到案的歷史脈絡(luò)。第二章主要論述刑事到案的基本理論,具體論述刑事到案控權(quán)原則、程序正義原則,以及刑事到案防止犯罪嫌疑人逃避追訴、及時(shí)查證并確定處理方式、保全證據(jù)及保障人權(quán)的基本功能。第三章對(duì)我國(guó)刑事到案制度的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行評(píng)析。從我國(guó)刑事到案措施運(yùn)用混亂、到案期間查證與權(quán)利保障沖突及終結(jié)到案不力這三大現(xiàn)實(shí)困境入手,簡(jiǎn)析我國(guó)刑事到案問題出現(xiàn)的原因主要為制度缺陷、到案適用權(quán)力控制不足及法定到案措施適用被限制過嚴(yán)。第四章以域外刑事到案制度為參考,分析并歸納不同國(guó)家和地區(qū)刑事到案制度的異同點(diǎn),通過分析比較,以求充分借鑒其行之有效的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)。第五章以問題為導(dǎo)向,就本文闡述的問題,一是提出建立無證到案制度、刑事立案登記程序等制度性改革措施,二是針對(duì)到案權(quán)力行使提出如何擴(kuò)張到案措施適用權(quán)并限制到案期間公權(quán)力行使的改革性措施,三是針對(duì)我國(guó)刑事到案制度如何具體配置提出本文的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Criminal to case is an important link in criminal proceedings. At present, on the one hand, the number of criminal cases is increasing, the pressure of cracking down on crimes and maintaining social stability is increasing; on the other hand, the situation of infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects is repeatedly prohibited, and there are constant calls for protecting human rights. People's consciousness of rights and the concept of right-based have been constantly strengthened. The fight against crime and the protection of human rights are in a relatively tense state, and the establishment of a scientific and reasonable criminal to case system is conducive to balancing the relationship between combating crime and safeguarding human rights. This article will focus on how to deal with the relationship between the two, starting from clarifying the connotation and extension of criminal cases, making a systematic analysis of criminal cases, combining with the experience of extraterritorial cases, This paper puts forward the countermeasures to solve the problems existing in the criminal cases in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an overview of criminal cases, including two aspects of the content. The first includes the basic category of criminal cases and the second includes the historical context of criminal cases in China and foreign countries. The second chapter mainly discusses the basic theory of criminal cases, including the principle of criminal case control right, the principle of procedural justice, and the prevention of criminal suspects from prosecution, timely investigation and determination of the way to deal with it. The basic function of preserving evidence and protecting human rights. The third chapter analyzes the present situation of criminal cases system in China. Starting from the three practical dilemmas of the application of criminal to case measures in China, the conflict between investigation and protection of rights during the case, and the weak ending to the case, this paper briefly analyzes that the main reasons for the emergence of the problem of criminal cases in our country are the defects of the system. The power to apply to the case control is inadequate and the application of statutory measures is too strict. The fourth chapter analyzes and summarizes the similarities and differences between different countries and regions in order to fully learn from its effective practical experience. The fifth chapter is problem-oriented, as to the problems described in this paper, the first is to put forward the system reform measures, such as the establishment of the system of undocumented cases, the procedure of criminal filing and registration, and so on. The second is how to expand the right to apply to the case and limit the public power to the case, and the third is to put forward the views of this article on how to allocate the criminal case to the case system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 馬靜華;;偵查到案制度比較研究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2009年05期

2 馬靜華;;我國(guó)偵查到案制度沿革述評(píng)[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年07期

3 馬靜華;;偵查到案:查證功能與期限配置[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2009年05期

4 楊成;;從抓捕的濫用看法定偵查到案措施的缺陷[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年33期

5 高茜;;刑事強(qiáng)制到案制度構(gòu)建芻議[J];武漢公安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

6 吳暢;;偵查中強(qiáng)制到案措施基本問題研究[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 吳暢;;我國(guó)刑事強(qiáng)制到案制度的現(xiàn)狀與改革[J];財(cái)經(jīng)政法資訊;2006年06期

8 曹文安;;論留置及其與強(qiáng)制到案措施之整合[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

9 彭慶麗;偵查中強(qiáng)制到案措施的不足與整合[J];玉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 馬靜華;;偵查到案制度:從現(xiàn)實(shí)到理想[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李影;中國(guó)警察刑事職權(quán)配置問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張寧寧;我國(guó)偵查到案措施體系研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

2 吳暢;刑事強(qiáng)制到案制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1862639