本文選題：三網(wǎng)融合 + 信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)��； 參考：《煙臺大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自2000年首提三網(wǎng)融合概念以來我國在三網(wǎng)融合方面進行了大量的嘗試,2015年國務院頒布的《三網(wǎng)融合推廣方案》標志著三網(wǎng)融合在我國開始了全面推廣的進程。三網(wǎng)融合帶來的便利顯而易見,但是設備終端的多功能化在給用戶帶來便利的同時也給著作權(quán)法尤其是信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)和廣播權(quán)層面帶來了極大的沖擊。究其原因,一是由于立法本身的滯后屬性,二是我國著作權(quán)法中關于信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)與廣播權(quán)的法律設置與技術層面聯(lián)系太深。我國學界先后提出了多種重構(gòu)方案,然而對于重構(gòu)方案的理論依據(jù)和實踐支撐尚缺乏深入的分析和探索。以學界現(xiàn)有的重構(gòu)方案為出發(fā)點,通過對現(xiàn)有重構(gòu)方案進行分類與評價,選擇技術中立的遠程傳播權(quán)重構(gòu)方案作為研究對象;橫向?qū)Ρ任覈⒎ㄅc世界的向公眾傳播權(quán),為遠程傳播權(quán)重構(gòu)方案的選擇尋求理論支撐;通過剖析我國司法中的典型案例提出對信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)與廣播權(quán)進行重構(gòu)的現(xiàn)實需求;結(jié)合我國著作權(quán)法草案的修改歷程提出送審稿中對播放權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)的規(guī)定在三網(wǎng)融合的大趨勢下并非長久之計,三網(wǎng)融合并隨的技術融合局面要求立法必須保持足夠的技術中立,遠程傳播權(quán)的行為主義立法路徑是較為明智的選擇,同時對遠程傳播權(quán)進行了簡單細化。
[Abstract]:Since the concept of triple network fusion was first put forward in 2000, China has made a great deal of attempts in the field of triple network integration. In 2015, the State Council promulgated the "Tri-Network Fusion Promotion Program", which marks the beginning of the process of all-around promotion of Tri-net Fusion in China. The convenience brought by the integration of three networks is obvious, but the multifunction of the equipment terminal not only brings convenience to the user, but also brings great impact to the copyright law, especially the information network transmission right and the broadcasting right level. The reasons are, firstly, the lagging attribute of the legislation itself, and second, the legal setting and technical connection between the right of information network communication and the right of broadcasting in the copyright law of our country are too deep. The academic circles of our country have put forward many kinds of reconstruction schemes, but the theoretical basis and practical support of the reconstruction schemes are still lack of deep analysis and exploration. By classifying and evaluating the existing reconstruction schemes, the author chooses the technology neutral reconstruction scheme as the research object, and compares the legislation of our country with the public transmission right in the world. By analyzing the typical cases in our country, the author puts forward the realistic demand for the reconstruction of information network communication right and broadcasting right. According to the revision course of the draft copyright Law of our country, it is not a long-term plan to put forward the regulations on broadcast right and information network transmission right in the draft submitted for review under the general trend of the integration of three networks. The integration of three networks and accompanying technology requires legislation to maintain sufficient technical neutrality. The behaviorist legislative path of remote communication right is a more sensible choice, and the remote communication right is simply refined.
【學位授予單位】：煙臺大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馮曉青;費氧;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)電視著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年02期

2 祝建軍;;“三網(wǎng)融合”著作權(quán)案件梳理與問題分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年01期

3 王遷;;論廣播組織轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)的擴張——兼評《著作權(quán)法修訂草案(送審稿)》第42條[J];法商研究;2016年01期

4 何懷文;;我國著作人身權(quán)與著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)調(diào)的法律原則[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年09期

5 鮑征燁;;IPTV版權(quán)問題探析——以“回看”模式為例[J];重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2015年04期

6 蘇志甫;;網(wǎng)絡著作權(quán)保護法律適用問題研究——以法院相關判例為切入點[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年06期

7 王言昭;;新媒體背景下我國體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)的保護研究[J];山東體育學院學報;2015年01期

8 王遷;;IPTV限時回看服務性質(zhì)研究[J];中國版權(quán);2015年01期

9 張照龍;;論三網(wǎng)融合下對廣播權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)重構(gòu)方案的選擇[J];傳播與版權(quán);2014年12期

10 車紅蕾;;司法經(jīng)驗是完善信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權(quán)制度的寶貴資源[J];人民司法;2014年19期

，

本文編號：1852122