本文選題：刑事錯(cuò)案 + 刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)　； 參考：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文的研究對(duì)象是刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度的完善,關(guān)于刑事錯(cuò)案追究制度沒(méi)有明確統(tǒng)一的法律規(guī)定,主要的立法規(guī)定散見(jiàn)于各個(gè)單行的法律法規(guī)或者部門規(guī)章之中,未形成統(tǒng)一的刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度,因此無(wú)法統(tǒng)一進(jìn)行法律適用。關(guān)于該制度的規(guī)定欠缺刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)的程序立法,在追責(zé)過(guò)程中,追責(zé)機(jī)關(guān)自由的選擇追責(zé)的程序,造成程序的混亂模糊。目前,我國(guó)正在進(jìn)行如火如荼的司法改革,刑事錯(cuò)案的問(wèn)題也一次次的引起人們廣泛的關(guān)注,一旦錯(cuò)案被曝光就會(huì)引起廣泛的討論。對(duì)于刑事錯(cuò)案研究較多的是刑事錯(cuò)案應(yīng)當(dāng)怎樣進(jìn)行預(yù)防的問(wèn)題,但是預(yù)防刑事錯(cuò)案的發(fā)生只是刑事錯(cuò)案研究的一個(gè)方面,對(duì)刑事錯(cuò)案的研究應(yīng)向刑事錯(cuò)案的責(zé)任追究制度投向更多的目光,加強(qiáng)刑事錯(cuò)案的追責(zé)力度,這對(duì)于預(yù)防刑事錯(cuò)案也是非常有益的。刑事錯(cuò)案發(fā)生之后不僅僅應(yīng)當(dāng)在“名義上”進(jìn)行糾正,而必須將具體的責(zé)任落實(shí)到有過(guò)錯(cuò)的人員身上。本文在前言部分對(duì)刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度建立的社會(huì)背景進(jìn)行分析,闡述這一制度建立的必要性和制度建立的意義。第一章主要闡述刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度的兩個(gè)基本問(wèn)題,首先,在目前的理論界,對(duì)刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度應(yīng)否存在是有爭(zhēng)議的,肯定的觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為這項(xiàng)制度的建立符合權(quán)責(zé)統(tǒng)一的理論,同時(shí)有利于對(duì)司法權(quán)進(jìn)行監(jiān)督,否定的觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,建立刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度,不利于司法獨(dú)立精神的實(shí)現(xiàn),容易滋生司法不作為。其次,關(guān)于刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度與國(guó)家賠償制度之間的關(guān)系在認(rèn)識(shí)上人們存在一些誤區(qū),本文對(duì)這個(gè)問(wèn)題也進(jìn)行了闡述。第二章對(duì)刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行解釋,刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度的建立,最關(guān)鍵的無(wú)疑就是刑事錯(cuò)案的概念,因?yàn)檫@關(guān)系到一個(gè)案件能否被確定為刑事錯(cuò)案的定性問(wèn)題。同時(shí)本文將對(duì)刑事錯(cuò)案責(zé)任的構(gòu)成體系進(jìn)行分析,以甄別哪些案件應(yīng)當(dāng)作為錯(cuò)案對(duì)其進(jìn)行責(zé)任追究,防止將不應(yīng)當(dāng)追責(zé)的案件納入追責(zé)的范圍。本文第三章簡(jiǎn)述了西方國(guó)家對(duì)司法人員的懲戒制度,通過(guò)域外制度的分析以期選擇可以借鑒的因素,幫助我國(guó)建立完善的刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度。最后是刑事錯(cuò)案制度完善的具體措施,也是本文的重點(diǎn)部分,主要從刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度的啟動(dòng)主體、刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)的程序運(yùn)行、刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度追責(zé)范圍、刑事錯(cuò)案責(zé)任承擔(dān)形式這幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述,以期形成完整的刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度的框架�？偠灾�,就是要建立統(tǒng)一規(guī)范的刑事錯(cuò)案追責(zé)制度體系,防止法律適用的混亂。這樣才能做到“有錯(cuò)必有責(zé)”,彰顯社會(huì)公正,弘揚(yáng)法治精神。在依法治國(guó)的大背景之下,該制度的完善將使法治的理念更加深入人心。
[Abstract]:The object of this study is the perfection of the system of pursuing criminal misdemeanours. There are no clear and uniform legal provisions on the system of investigating criminal errors. The main legislative provisions are scattered among the individual laws and regulations or departmental regulations. There is no uniform system of criminal malpractice, so it is impossible to apply the law uniformly. The provisions of this system lack of procedural legislation for the prosecution of criminal misdemeanours. In the process of pursuing responsibility, the free choice of the procedures of the accountability agencies results in confusion of the procedures. At present, our country is carrying on the judicial reform in full swing, the problem of the criminal wrong case also causes the widespread concern time and again, once the wrong case is exposed, will cause the widespread discussion. For the study of criminal error cases, it is more about how to prevent them, but the prevention of the occurrence of criminal wrong cases is only one aspect of the study of criminal wrong cases. The research on the criminal wrong case should pay more attention to the system of investigating the responsibility of the criminal wrong case, and strengthen the pursuit of the criminal wrong case, which is also very beneficial to the prevention of the criminal wrong case. After the occurrence of criminal error, it should not only be corrected in nominal terms, but also should be put into practice to the person who is at fault. In the preface of this paper, the author analyzes the social background of the establishment of the criminal misdemeanor system, and expounds the necessity of the establishment of the system and the significance of the establishment of the system. The first chapter mainly expounds two basic problems of the system of pursuing criminal misdemeanor. Firstly, in the current theoretical circle, it is controversial whether there should be a criminal misdemeanor system. The positive view is that the establishment of this system accords with the unified theory of power and responsibility. At the same time, it is beneficial to the supervision of judicial power. The negative view is that the establishment of the system of pursuing responsibility in criminal cases is not conducive to the realization of the spirit of judicial independence, and it is easy to breed judicial inaction. Secondly, there are some misunderstandings about the relationship between the system of pursuing criminal malpractice and the system of national compensation. The second chapter explains the related concepts of the criminal misdemeanor system. The most important thing in the establishment of the criminal misdemeanor system is undoubtedly the concept of the criminal wrong case, because it is related to whether a case can be determined as the qualitative problem of the criminal wrong case. At the same time, this paper will analyze the constitution system of the responsibility of the criminal wrong case, in order to identify which cases should be investigated as the wrong cases, and prevent the cases that should not be pursued with the scope of the pursuit of responsibility. The third chapter briefly describes the western countries' disciplinary system for judicial personnel, through the analysis of the extraterritorial system in order to choose the factors that can be used for reference, to help our country to establish a perfect system of criminal misdemeanor. Finally, it is the specific measures to perfect the criminal mismatch system, which is also the key part of this paper. It mainly starts from the starting subject of the criminal mismatch system, the procedure operation of the criminal misdemeanor system, and the scope of the criminal misdemeanor pursuit system. In order to form a complete framework of criminal misdemeanor system, this paper expounds the forms of criminal misdemeanor responsibility. In a word, it is necessary to establish a unified and standardized system of criminal misdemeanor to prevent confusion in the application of the law. Only in this way can we achieve "mistakes and responsibilities", highlight social justice and promote the spirit of rule of law. Under the background of ruling the country by law, the perfection of this system will make the idea of rule of law more popular.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳海鋒;;錯(cuò)案責(zé)任追究的主體研究[J];法學(xué);2016年02期

2 李松;;國(guó)家賠償:追償規(guī)定“懸空”[J];法治與社會(huì);2014年11期

3 楊夢(mèng)玉;;刑事錯(cuò)案的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];天津市經(jīng)理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

4 嚴(yán)仁群;美國(guó)法官懲戒制度論要——兼析中美懲戒理念之差異[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年06期

5 王晨光;法律運(yùn)行中的不確定性與“錯(cuò)案追究制”的誤區(qū)[J];法學(xué);1997年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1779118