著作權侵權判定中“通知—刪除”規(guī)則的適用研究
本文選題:知識產(chǎn)權 + 網(wǎng)絡著作權; 參考:《蘭州大學》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)高速發(fā)展的今天,信息傳播的速度早已超過人們的想象,大數(shù)據(jù)、云計算等新鮮詞匯充斥耳邊,在推動和促進經(jīng)濟和文化發(fā)展的同時,也為著作權侵權提供了滋生的土壤和法律規(guī)制的滯后,在網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下著作權侵權糾紛頻發(fā),其中以百度案、雅虎案等為代表的典型案件為我國淡薄的版權意識敲響警鐘。在這些頻繁發(fā)生的糾紛尋求解決的過程中,最為核心的就是著作權侵權的判定。在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺發(fā)生的著作權侵權問題總是面臨著責任主體及歸責原則難以確定的問題,即侵權判定上具有復雜性和多樣性,這也是解決著作權侵權糾紛的難點所在。在此背景下,“通知-刪除”規(guī)則應運而生。作為網(wǎng)絡服務提供商用于免責的“通知-刪除”規(guī)則,平衡了網(wǎng)絡服務提供商和網(wǎng)絡用戶、著作權人三方的利益。但是在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)不斷深入和拓寬我們生活的今天,知識產(chǎn)權領域以“通知-刪除”規(guī)則為代表的著作權侵權保護制度仍有侵權判定、責任原則、通知標準等問題亟待解決。本文通過考察“通知-刪除”規(guī)則的產(chǎn)生,在分析該規(guī)則的法理原理和技術手段在著作權侵權案件判定中的運用,并同時橫向比較各國關于“通知-刪除”規(guī)則的規(guī)定與司法實踐的基礎上,闡述我國“通知-刪除”的立法及司法實踐。從“通知-刪除”規(guī)則在著作權侵權糾紛中的核心要素責任主體、責任認定標準、版權領域以及當前日趨成熟的網(wǎng)絡商務平臺出發(fā),在前文分析的基礎上對我國“通知-刪除”規(guī)則在著作權侵權判定的適用提出一些粗淺的看法和建議,以期對構建一個完善的“通知-刪除”規(guī)則體系有所啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:Today, with the rapid development of the Internet industry, the speed of information dissemination has already exceeded people's imagination. Big data, cloud computing and other fresh words are full of ears, while promoting and promoting economic and cultural development,It also provides breeding soil for copyright infringement and lag of legal regulation. In the network environment, copyright infringement disputes occur frequently. Typical cases, such as Baidu case, Yahoo case and so on, serve as a wake-up call for weak copyright awareness in our country.In the process of finding a solution to these frequent disputes, the most important thing is the judgment of copyright infringement.The problem of copyright infringement on Internet platform is always faced with the problem that the subject of responsibility and the principle of imputation are difficult to determine, that is, the judgment of infringement is complicated and diverse, which is also the difficulty to solve the dispute of copyright infringement.In this context, the "Notification-Delete" rule came into being.The "Notification-Delete" rule, which is used as a network service provider, balances the interests of the network service provider, the network user and the copyright owner.However, as the Internet continues to deepen and broaden our life today, the copyright infringement protection system represented by "Notification-Delete" rules in the field of intellectual property rights still has some problems to be solved urgently, such as infringement judgment, liability principle, notification standard and so on.By investigating the emergence of "Notification-Delete" rule, this paper analyzes the legal principle and technical means of the rule and its application in the judgment of copyright infringement cases.At the same time, the legislation and judicial practice of "Notification-Delete" in China are expounded on the basis of the horizontal comparison of the rules of "Notification-Delete" and judicial practice.Starting from the "Notification-Delete" rule in copyright infringement disputes, the main elements of the responsibility of the core elements, liability standards, copyright field and the current maturing network business platform,On the basis of the above analysis, this paper puts forward some general views and suggestions on the application of "Notification-Delete" rules in the judgment of copyright infringement, in order to enlighten the construction of a perfect "Notification-Delete" rule system.
【學位授予單位】:蘭州大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D923.41
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 楊桂琴;楊金;康彥叢;;郵政跨境電子商務風險防范研究[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2016年12期
2 徐明;;避風港原則前沿問題研究——以“通知-刪除”作為訴訟前置程序為展開[J];東方法學;2016年05期
3 張賽婭;;淺析競價排名中搜索引擎的審查義務——以“魏則西事件”為引[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2016年24期
4 王遷;;王遷:電商知識產(chǎn)權保護頻遭惡意維權需完善法規(guī)[J];河南科技;2016年12期
5 徐敏;劉友華;;電商平臺專利間接侵權的注意義務研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2016年05期
6 何瓊;呂璐;;“通知—刪除”規(guī)則在專利領域的適用困境——兼論《侵權責任法》第36條的彌補與完善[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2016年05期
7 鄧蔚霞;;立法打磨專利“盔甲”[J];浙江人大;2016年01期
8 陳紹玲;王文敏;;俄羅斯《反盜版法》評析及其對我國網(wǎng)絡著作權保護的啟示[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2015年10期
9 許諒亮;;網(wǎng)絡交易平臺提供商專利侵權法律責任[J];科技與法律;2015年03期
10 司曉;范露瓊;;知識產(chǎn)權領域“通知—刪除”規(guī)則濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2015年Z1期
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 董毅智;;惡意維權暴露電商平臺“通知—刪除”規(guī)則漏洞[N];中國工商報;2017年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 郭元君;中美避風港規(guī)則研究[D];中國政法大學;2011年
2 于麗娜;中美網(wǎng)絡服務商避風港制度中“通知與刪除”規(guī)則的比較研究[D];上海交通大學;2010年
,本文編號:1773892
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1773892.html