本文選題：利益 + 利益衡量��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)初,概念法學(xué)逐漸走向沒落,利益法學(xué)逐漸興起,日本學(xué)者在利益法學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)上把利益衡量論本土化,使之與日本法律規(guī)則相協(xié)調(diào)。20世紀(jì)90年代,梁慧星教授將利益衡量論帶入到我國,時(shí)至今日,司法案件中隨處可見利益衡量的影子,但是從判決的內(nèi)容來看,各有差異,也就是說衡量的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)非常之模糊,有的判決甚至很難看出究竟適用了何種標(biāo)準(zhǔn),值得承認(rèn)的是,利益衡量的適用使得判決的實(shí)質(zhì)性結(jié)果更為公正,但這僅僅只是相對于沒有適用利益衡量所作的判決。實(shí)際上,利益衡量作為法官行使自由裁量權(quán)的體現(xiàn),同樣也需要受到約束,限權(quán)思想同樣也適用利益衡量理論,規(guī)范利益衡量最為理想的辦法就是確定利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),究竟要構(gòu)建何種利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來應(yīng)對當(dāng)今復(fù)雜的利益關(guān)系,是研究利益衡量理論的要求,更是法治民主化的需要。本文意在確定利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以此來規(guī)范法官利益自由裁量權(quán),使得司法判決更趨向于合法、合理化,文章從結(jié)構(gòu)上分四部分:第一部分是利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的概述部分,此部分包括利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相關(guān)概念的界定、利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理論問題評述,以及適用利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的必要性,這一部分意在為全文的研究提供理論基礎(chǔ)。第二部分是利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題的反思,包括影響利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的因素分析、利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)難題所在、利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的目標(biāo)問題以及利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的理想模式,此部分是為下一部分做鋪墊。第三部分構(gòu)建利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模型,主要包含利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模型的構(gòu)建步驟、利益的劃分和評價(jià)、價(jià)值位階以及比例的設(shè)定,此部分是本文寫作的主旨部分。第四部分論述利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模型如何適用。以“索特公司與新萬基公司合同糾紛案”為例,意在論證本文所提倡的利益衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模型是具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義的,是具有可操作性的。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the 20th century, the concept of law gradually declined, and the law of interests gradually rose. Japanese scholars localized the theory of interest measurement on the basis of the law of interest, making it coordinate with the Japanese legal rules in the 1990s.Professor Liang Huixing brought the theory of interest measurement into our country. Up to now, the shadow of interest measurement can be seen everywhere in judicial cases. However, judging from the content of the judgment, there are differences, that is to say, the standard of measurement is very vague.Some judgments are even difficult to see what criteria are applied. It is worth acknowledging that the application of interest measurement makes the substantive outcome of the judgment more just, but this is only relative to the judgment made without applying the measure of interest.In fact, as the embodiment of the judge's discretion, the measure of interests also needs to be restricted. The idea of limiting the right also applies to the theory of the measurement of interests. The most ideal way to standardize the measurement of interests is to determine the standard of measuring interests.What kind of interest measurement standard should be constructed to deal with the complex interest relationship is the requirement of studying the theory of interest measurement and the need of democratization of the rule of law.The purpose of this paper is to determine the standard of interest measurement, so as to standardize the discretion of the judge's interests, and to make the judicial decision more legal and reasonable. The article is structured into four parts: the first part is an overview of the standard of interest measurement.This part includes the definition of the relevant concepts of the interest measurement standard, the comment on the theory of the interest measurement standard, and the necessity of applying the interest measurement standard. This part is intended to provide the theoretical basis for the research of the full text.The second part is the reflection of the standard of interest measurement, including the analysis of factors that influence the standard of interest measurement, the difficult problem of the standard of interest measurement, the goal problem of the standard of interest measurement and the ideal model of the standard of interest measurement.This part is to pave the way for the next part.The third part constructs the standard model of interest measurement, which mainly includes the steps of constructing the standard model of interest measurement, the division and evaluation of interest, the setting of value rank and proportion. This part is the main purpose of this paper.The fourth part discusses how to apply the standard model of interest measurement.Taking the case of contract dispute between Sot Company and Xinwangji Company as an example, it is intended to prove that the standard model of interest measurement advocated in this paper has practical significance and maneuverability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D916

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁上上;;制度利益衡量的邏輯[J];中國法學(xué);2012年04期

2 張偉強(qiáng);;利益衡量及其理論的反思——一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)分析的視角[J];法學(xué)論壇;2012年04期

3 陳曉英;;中國社會(huì)主流價(jià)值觀分析[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 朱瑞;朱國平;;論利益衡量的正當(dāng)化[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年21期

5 杜月秋;;論裁判的正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ) 以法律效果和社會(huì)效果的相互關(guān)系為視角[J];法律適用;2007年03期

6 陳金釗;;法治、法律方法與法律智慧[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

7 呂世倫;;論德沃金的“整體性法律”理論[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年07期

8 暍哲夫;王充;;法益概念與多元的保護(hù)法益論[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

9 梁慧星;從法律的性質(zhì)看裁判的方法[J];金陵法律評論;2005年01期

10 陳興華,李娜;論利益衡量在民法適用中的展開[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2004年06期

，

本文編號：1760020