本文選題：制度反腐　切入點(diǎn)：黨內(nèi)法規(guī)　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：黨的十八屆四中全會(huì)提出的“把黨內(nèi)法規(guī)體系納入到中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法治體系中,將黨紀(jì)與國(guó)法更好的融合起來(lái)”,肯定了紀(jì)法銜接理論研究的重要性。黨的十八屆六中全會(huì)提出“要以更大力度管黨治黨”,再一次提高了對(duì)“全面從嚴(yán)治黨”的重視程度。中央紀(jì)律檢查委員會(huì)第七次全體會(huì)議總結(jié)十八大以來(lái)的工作經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出“全面從嚴(yán)治黨,必須抓住嚴(yán)肅黨內(nèi)政治生活這個(gè)根本,扎緊制度籠子,強(qiáng)化黨內(nèi)監(jiān)督�！边@說(shuō)明“制度反腐”在推進(jìn)黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)和反腐敗斗爭(zhēng)中有著十分重要的作用。黨內(nèi)法規(guī)是黨的各項(xiàng)紀(jì)律要求的制度化形態(tài),黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律都是實(shí)現(xiàn)依法治國(guó)的基礎(chǔ),也是“制度反腐”不可或缺的左膀右臂。基于制度反腐,要實(shí)現(xiàn)依法治國(guó)和依規(guī)治黨的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一,使二者更能高效率懲治腐敗犯罪,需要明確黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律有哪些不同的功能。同時(shí),還要使黨內(nèi)法規(guī)和國(guó)家法律合理區(qū)分又有效銜接:合理區(qū)分主要是區(qū)分黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律的不同界限、不同領(lǐng)域和不同標(biāo)準(zhǔn);有效銜接主要是實(shí)現(xiàn)黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律目標(biāo)指向的有效銜接、規(guī)范對(duì)象的有效銜接、和內(nèi)容實(shí)體的有效銜接。黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律也會(huì)出現(xiàn)銜接不暢的問(wèn)題,需要我們確立二者銜接要堅(jiān)持哪些基本原則,如何才能加強(qiáng)黨內(nèi)法規(guī)制定與國(guó)家立法之間的溝通與協(xié)調(diào),解決二者銜接之間的障礙,共同構(gòu)建制度的籠子,強(qiáng)化權(quán)力制約監(jiān)督,努力構(gòu)建領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐的長(zhǎng)效機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward the "incorporation of the inner-party legal system into the legal system of socialism with Chinese characteristics," Better integration of party discipline and state law "affirmed the importance of the theoretical study on the convergence of discipline and law." the sixth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed that "we should administer the Party with greater efforts", which once again raised the importance of "managing the Party in a comprehensive and strict manner". The seventh plenary meeting of the Central Commission for discipline Inspection summed up the work experience since the 18th National Congress of the CPC Central Committee for discipline Inspection, It is proposed that "in order to administer the Party in an all-round and strict manner, we must grasp the fundamental principle of serious political life within the Party and tighten the cage of the system." Strengthening inner-party supervision. "this shows that" institutional anti-corruption "plays a very important role in promoting the building of a clean and honest party and in the struggle against corruption. Inner-party laws and regulations are the institutionalized form of the Party's various disciplinary requirements. Both inner-party laws and national laws are the basis for administering the country according to law, and they are also indispensable for "institutional anti-corruption." based on institutional anti-corruption, the organic unity of governing the country according to law and governing the party in accordance with regulations is to be realized. To make them more efficient in punishing corruption crimes, it is necessary to clarify the different functions of inner-party laws and national laws. At the same time, The reasonable distinction between the inner-party law and the national law should be effectively connected: the reasonable distinction is mainly to distinguish the different boundaries between the inner-party laws and the national laws, different fields and different standards; Effective cohesion is mainly to realize the effective connection between the inner-party law and the national law, the effective connection between the normative object and the content entity, and the problem that the inner-party law and the national law will not be connected smoothly. It is necessary for us to establish which basic principles to adhere to, how to strengthen the communication and coordination between the formulation of laws and regulations within the Party and the national legislation, to solve the obstacles between the two, to build the cage of the system together, and to strengthen the supervision of power restriction. Efforts to build leading cadres dare not rot, can not rot, do not want to rot long-term mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D262.6;D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳柳裕;;黨內(nèi)法規(guī):內(nèi)涵、外延及與法律之關(guān)系——學(xué)習(xí)貫徹黨的十八屆六中全會(huì)精神的思考[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2017年01期

2 王娟;;關(guān)于建立備案審查銜接聯(lián)動(dòng)機(jī)制的思考[J];上海人大月刊;2017年01期

3 劉煥明;;堅(jiān)持紀(jì)在法前 推動(dòng)紀(jì)法銜接[J];紅旗文稿;2016年24期

4 新華社評(píng)論員;;以更大力度管黨治黨[J];實(shí)踐(思想理論版);2016年11期

5 習(xí)近平;;關(guān)于《關(guān)于新形勢(shì)下黨內(nèi)政治生活的若干準(zhǔn)則》和《中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨黨內(nèi)監(jiān)督條例》的說(shuō)明[J];黨建;2016年11期

6 李岳鵬;;基于政黨政治角度對(duì)新修訂《條例》的思考[J];新西部(理論版);2016年17期

7 劉振宇;;論黨內(nèi)法規(guī)和國(guó)家法律的銜接路徑[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年04期

8 屠凱;;黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律共處中的兩個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)法律評(píng)論;2016年03期

9 劉松山;;權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)行使職權(quán)中的黨內(nèi)法規(guī)與國(guó)家法律[J];中國(guó)法律評(píng)論;2016年03期

10 黃新根;;著力構(gòu)建不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐的機(jī)制研究[J];中共南昌市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前6條

1 姜潔;;推動(dòng)全面從嚴(yán)治黨邁向標(biāo)本兼治[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2017年

2 李紅權(quán);;全面從嚴(yán)治黨思想的四個(gè)戰(zhàn)略維度[N];吉林日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

3 付子堂;;為依法治國(guó)提供學(xué)理支撐[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

4 李紅權(quán);李忠軍;;法治精神與禮治精華[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 李紅權(quán);;構(gòu)建新時(shí)期的腐敗預(yù)防機(jī)制[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 習(xí)近平;;認(rèn)真學(xué)習(xí)黨章 嚴(yán)格遵守黨章[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 葛金川;十八大以來(lái)中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨制度反腐建設(shè)研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

2 熊媛媛;十八大以來(lái)我國(guó)制度反腐建設(shè)研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

3 高兵;論完善我國(guó)反腐敗立法[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2015年

4 陳玲;論黨紀(jì)與國(guó)法的關(guān)系[D];上海大學(xué);2015年

5 李波;中國(guó)反腐敗法律體系構(gòu)建研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2013年

6 路雨微;中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨黨內(nèi)法規(guī)制度體系建設(shè)研究[D];中共中央黨校;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1681403