本文選題：認罪認罰從寬　切入點：法律監(jiān)督　出處：《四川省社會科學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：十八屆四中全會決定提出要完善認罪認罰從寬制度,將其作為實現(xiàn)“以審判為中心”的司法制度改革的重要舉措。在認罪認罰從寬制度中,檢察機關(guān)需對犯罪嫌疑人指控的罪名、從寬量刑、案件的適用程序等事項做出決定或者提出建議。相較于偵查機關(guān)只是將犯罪嫌疑人自愿認罪認罰在移送審查起訴時做出說明和法院主要對認罪認罰自愿性及檢察機關(guān)量刑建議的公允性進行審查,可以說檢察機關(guān)在認罪認罰案件中發(fā)揮著最為重要的作用。如何更好的發(fā)揮檢察機關(guān)在認罪認罰從寬制度中的作用,也就成為該制度有效運行的關(guān)鍵。本文第一章是認罪認罰從寬制度的基本概述。本章主要論述了認罪認罰從寬制度的內(nèi)涵、認罪認罰與辯訴交易制度和庭前認罪答辯程序間的區(qū)別以及認罪認罰從寬制度的價值取向,包括提高訴訟效率、順應(yīng)刑罰輕刑化理念、有利于犯罪人回歸社會、探索非對抗性訴訟格局和優(yōu)化司法資源配置。本文第二章闡述了認罪認罰從寬制度對檢察機關(guān)帶來的影響。第一檢察機關(guān)法律監(jiān)督權(quán)需要強化;第二是對檢察機關(guān)刑事訴訟權(quán)利的影響,包括對批準逮捕權(quán)的影響和審查起訴權(quán)的影響;第三是對檢察機關(guān)司法實踐工作的影響,包括控方證明責任的變化、訴訟對抗的前移和檢察機關(guān)工作中心的前移。本文第三章提出檢察環(huán)節(jié)適用認罪認罰從寬制度存在的問題,分為法律制度層面問題和司法實踐層面問題兩個方面。法律制度層面的問題包括犯罪嫌疑人權(quán)利保障機制不健全、犯罪嫌疑人認罪認罰的法律后果的不明確、檢察環(huán)節(jié)認罪認罰量刑規(guī)范不健全、認罪認罰從寬建議對檢察機關(guān)的效力不明以及被害人權(quán)利被忽視。司法實踐層面的問題包括檢察機關(guān)工作負擔的加重、犯罪嫌疑人虛假認罪問題和檢察機關(guān)自由裁量權(quán)較小。本文第四章針對檢察環(huán)節(jié)適用認罪認罰從寬制度存在的問題提出相應(yīng)的建議,分為法律制度層面的完善和現(xiàn)實困境的解決。法律制度的完善包括犯罪嫌疑人權(quán)利保障機制的構(gòu)建、檢察機關(guān)量刑建議規(guī)范的完善、認罪認罰從寬協(xié)議對檢察機關(guān)效力的明確以及被害人權(quán)利保護的重視�，F(xiàn)實困境的解決措施包括檢察機關(guān)工作負擔的減輕、犯罪嫌疑人虛假認罪的審查以及檢察官自由裁量權(quán)的擴大。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee decided to improve the leniency system of guilty admission and punishment as an important measure to realize the reform of the judicial system with "trial as the center". The procuratorial organs should be lenient in sentencing the charges charged by the criminal suspects. Decisions or suggestions are made on matters such as the procedure applicable to the case... As opposed to the fact that the investigating authorities only explain the criminal suspect's voluntary admission of guilt and punishment at the time of the examination of the prosecution and the court mainly on the voluntary and prosecutorial nature of the guilty plea. The fairness of the sentencing recommendations of the organs shall be examined, It can be said that the procuratorial organ plays the most important role in the case of confession and punishment. How to better play the role of the procuratorial organ in the lenient system of confession and punishment, The first chapter of this paper is a basic overview of the leniency system of guilty pleas and punishments. This chapter mainly discusses the connotation of the leniency system of guilty admission and punishment. The difference between plea admission and punishment, plea bargaining system and plea plea defense procedure before trial, and the value orientation of lenient plea admission and punishment system, including improving the efficiency of litigation, complying with the concept of light punishment of punishment, is conducive to the return of criminals to society. In the second chapter, the author expounds the influence of the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment on the procuratorial organ. The first chapter needs to strengthen the legal supervision power of the procuratorial organ. The second is the influence on the criminal litigation rights of the procuratorial organs, including the influence on the power to approve arrest and the influence on the right to examine the prosecution; the third is the influence on the judicial practice of the procuratorial organs, including the change of the burden of proof of the prosecution. The third chapter of this paper points out the problems existing in the application of the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing in the procuratorial link. It is divided into two aspects: the legal system level and the judicial practice level. The legal system level includes the criminal suspects' rights protection mechanism is not perfect, and the legal consequences of the criminal suspects' confession and punishment are not clear. In the procuratorial link, the sentencing criterion of guilty admission and punishment is not perfect, the leniency of plea admission and punishment is not clear to the procuratorial organ and the victim's rights are ignored. The problems in judicial practice include the increase of the work burden of the procuratorial organ. The problem of false admission of guilt of criminal suspects and the discretion of procuratorial organs are relatively small. In the fourth chapter of this paper, the author puts forward corresponding suggestions on the problems existing in the application of lenient admission and punishment system in procuratorial links. The perfection of the legal system includes the construction of the protection mechanism of the criminal suspect's rights, the perfection of the standard of the procuratorial organ's sentencing suggestion, the improvement of the legal system and the solution of the practical dilemma. The agreement on leniency of plea, admission and punishment is clear about the effectiveness of procuratorial organs and the importance attached to the protection of the rights of victims. The solutions to the practical difficulties include the reduction of the work burden of procuratorial organs, The examination of false confession of criminal suspects and the expansion of the discretionary power of prosecutors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 韓旭;;辯護律師核實證據(jù)問題研究[J];法學(xué)家;2016年02期

，

本文編號：1665014