本文選題：事實(shí)推定　切入點(diǎn)：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法審判中,被控侵權(quán)人往往會(huì)針對(duì)被控侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品與其自身的關(guān)聯(lián)性或被控侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品并非假冒產(chǎn)品進(jìn)行抗辯,同時(shí)這也是在諸多知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法審判中事實(shí)認(rèn)定的基礎(chǔ)性問(wèn)題。所以這就引出了一個(gè)關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題,當(dāng)被控侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品的直接銷(xiāo)售行為確定,而對(duì)于直接制造商(生產(chǎn)者)是不確定的,怎樣確定侵權(quán)主體,就是本文需討論的問(wèn)題,即事實(shí)推定在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案中侵權(quán)主體認(rèn)定適用的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策。本文首先分析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)主體認(rèn)定的困境,用“中糧”案例來(lái)引出侵權(quán)主體認(rèn)定的困境;再通過(guò)分析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的特殊性來(lái)體現(xiàn)出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件侵權(quán)主體推定的前提條件;但法院在運(yùn)用事實(shí)推定也存在“兩難”境地,推定或不推定都會(huì)對(duì)雙方當(dāng)事人造成不利影響。分析了事實(shí)推定的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境后,通過(guò)具體案例的審判推定形式來(lái)研究法院是如何運(yùn)用事實(shí)推定的,再把這些案例的侵權(quán)主體信息進(jìn)行梳理或類(lèi)型化,來(lái)整理出法院對(duì)侵權(quán)主體認(rèn)定的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn);再通過(guò)案件審判運(yùn)用事實(shí)推定對(duì)當(dāng)事人所帶來(lái)的后續(xù)影響,即訴訟成本、聲譽(yù)影響、承擔(dān)實(shí)體責(zé)任等,來(lái)證明事實(shí)推定急需建立統(tǒng)一適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的緊迫性。最后通過(guò)事實(shí)推定在立法上的完善,事實(shí)推定在司法實(shí)踐中的適用規(guī)則以及事實(shí)推定對(duì)侵權(quán)主體認(rèn)定的適用條件三部分提出對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案中侵權(quán)主體認(rèn)定的對(duì)策,這些建議是為了統(tǒng)一裁判標(biāo)準(zhǔn),規(guī)范法官對(duì)案件的自由裁量,防止事實(shí)推定的濫用。
[Abstract]:In the judicial trial of intellectual property rights, the accused infringer often defends the relevance of the alleged infringing product to himself or the alleged infringing product is not a counterfeit product, At the same time, this is also a fundamental issue of fact determination in many intellectual property judicial trials. So this leads to a key issue, when the direct sale of the alleged infringing product is determined, For the direct manufacturer (producer) is uncertain, how to determine the subject of infringement is the issue to be discussed in this paper. Firstly, this paper analyzes the dilemma of the subject of intellectual property infringement, and uses the case of "Cofco" to lead to the dilemma of the subject of infringement; Through the analysis of the particularity of intellectual property litigation to reflect the premise of the presumption of infringement subject in intellectual property cases, but the court in the use of the presumption of fact also exists in a "dilemma", After analyzing the realistic predicament of the presumption of fact, this paper studies how the court applies the presumption of fact through the form of the presumption of trial in a specific case. Then combing or classifying the information of the tort subject in these cases to sort out the standard of the court's determination of the tortious subject, and then applying the presumption of fact to the parties through the trial of the case, that is, the cost of litigation, In order to prove the urgency of establishing the uniform applicable standard for the presumption of facts, it is urgent to establish a unified standard. Finally, through the perfection of the legislation of the presumption of fact, The applicable rules of the presumption of fact in judicial practice and the applicable conditions of the presumption of fact to the subject of infringement put forward the countermeasures to the subject of infringement in the case of intellectual property rights. These suggestions are aimed at unifying the standard of adjudication. Regulate the judge's discretion in the case and prevent the abuse of the presumption of fact.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 湖北省高級(jí)人民法院民三庭課題組;鐘莉;童海超;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)的主導(dǎo)作用研究——以湖北省司法與行政“雙軌制”知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)為研究對(duì)象[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

2 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于印發(fā)修改后的《民事案件案由規(guī)定》的通知[J];司法業(yè)務(wù)文選;2011年13期

3 劉友華;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛訴訟解決的現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年01期

4 馬忠法;王全弟;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的歷史成因、法定主義及其法律特征[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

5 張?jiān)迄i;徐靜;;論事實(shí)推定的規(guī)制路徑[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年02期

6 陳傳法;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體與特征新解[J];北京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉華俊;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

2 趙信會(huì);民事推定及其適用機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊林;論民事訴訟中的事實(shí)推定[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1659334