本文選題：行政決策責(zé)任追究　切入點(diǎn)：法制化　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國尚未建立專門針對(duì)重大行政決策責(zé)任追究的法律法規(guī)體系,由于決策失誤缺乏權(quán)威而有效的責(zé)任追究制度,導(dǎo)致在重大決策失誤發(fā)生的情況在無人承擔(dān)責(zé)任現(xiàn)象普遍存在。加強(qiáng)對(duì)重大行政責(zé)任追究的法制化問題研究,對(duì)于強(qiáng)化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)責(zé)任,推進(jìn)決策科學(xué)化以及加強(qiáng)對(duì)決策權(quán)的監(jiān)督具有重要的意義。本文利用公共選擇理論、有限理性決策理論和制度理論等理論基礎(chǔ)分析了我國重大行政決策責(zé)任追究法制化問題和對(duì)策。首先,闡述了我國行政決策責(zé)任法制化存在的問題,表現(xiàn)為行政決策責(zé)任追究對(duì)象不清晰,行政決策權(quán)限邊界不清,行政決策責(zé)任分擔(dān)不明,行政決策的黨政責(zé)任比較模糊不清,決策追究具體事項(xiàng)范圍不確定,行政決策責(zé)任追究追究程序不規(guī)范等方面。其次,概述了行政決策責(zé)任追究法制化問題的原因,國家和地方行政決策責(zé)任追究立法不完善,行政決策責(zé)任追究制度機(jī)制不完善,我國行政責(zé)任追究程序缺失,難以認(rèn)定決策失誤責(zé)任,行政決策責(zé)任追究意識(shí)和價(jià)值定位錯(cuò)位,行政決策責(zé)任追究法制化理論支持不足等。再次,分析了國外行政決策失誤責(zé)任追究制度建設(shè)經(jīng)驗(yàn),公眾知情權(quán)的立法保障措施,輿論對(duì)行政決策監(jiān)督的重要作用。通過法律明確行政決策程序,對(duì)行政決策失誤追究的責(zé)任主體、機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置、信息方面和行政道德點(diǎn)法建設(shè)進(jìn)行分析,歸納總結(jié)出國外行政決策失誤責(zé)任追究制度對(duì)我國的啟示和經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。最后,提出了重大行政決策責(zé)任追究法制化建設(shè)的對(duì)策,完善行政決策責(zé)任追究法律及制度體系,我國有關(guān)行政責(zé)任決策追究相關(guān)制度的立法應(yīng)該堅(jiān)持權(quán)責(zé)一致原則、責(zé)任追究法定原則、程序公開、公正原則和教育與懲戒相結(jié)合原則。行政決策責(zé)任追究主體法制化建設(shè),立法明確行政決策責(zé)任追究主體框架,確立行政決策責(zé)任追究的責(zé)任主體,直接責(zé)任人為責(zé)任主體,厘清行政決策中行政機(jī)關(guān)和黨委、人大之間的關(guān)系;行政決策責(zé)任追究程序法制化建設(shè),法定化行政決策責(zé)任追究的程序,行政決策責(zé)任追究的具體程序一定要體現(xiàn)公平性。
[Abstract]:China has not yet established a system of laws and regulations specifically aimed at the investigation of responsibility for major administrative decisions. Due to the lack of authority and effectiveness of the system of accountability for decision-making mistakes, The situation that led to the occurrence of major decision-making mistakes is widespread in the absence of responsibility. To strengthen the research on the legalization of the investigation of major administrative responsibilities, It is of great significance to promote scientific decision-making and strengthen the supervision of decision-making power. Based on the theory of limited rational decision-making and system theory, this paper analyzes the problems and countermeasures of the legalization of the major administrative decision responsibility in China. First, the paper expounds the problems existing in the legalization of administrative decision-making responsibility in our country. It shows that the object of investigation of administrative decision responsibility is not clear, the boundary of administrative decision authority is unclear, the responsibility of administrative decision is not clear, the responsibility of party and government of administrative decision is relatively vague, the scope of specific matter of decision making is uncertain, Secondly, it summarizes the reasons of the legalization of administrative decision responsibility investigation, the imperfect legislation of national and local administrative decision responsibility investigation, and the imperfect system mechanism of administrative decision responsibility investigation. China's administrative responsibility investigation procedures are missing, it is difficult to identify the responsibility for decision-making errors, the sense of responsibility for administrative decision making and value positioning are misplaced, and the theory of accountability for administrative decision responsibility is not supported by the theory of legalization, etc. Again, This paper analyzes the experience of foreign countries in the construction of accountability system for administrative decision making errors, the legislative safeguard measures of the public's right to know, and the important role of public opinion in the supervision of administrative decision making. Based on the analysis of the responsibility subject, institution setting, information aspect and administrative moral point method construction of administrative decision making fault investigation, the enlightenment and experience of foreign administrative decision making fault accountability system to our country are summarized and summarized. This paper puts forward the countermeasures of the legalization construction of the major administrative decision responsibility investigation, consummates the law and system system of the administrative decision responsibility investigation, and the legislation of the related system of the administrative responsibility responsibility investigation in our country should adhere to the principle of consistent power and responsibility. Legal principles of accountability, openness of procedures, principles of justice and combination of education and discipline. Legal construction of the subject of accountability for administrative decision-making, legislative clarification of the framework of the subject of accountability for administrative decision-making, To establish the main body of responsibility for the investigation of administrative decision responsibility, with the person directly responsible for the responsibility as the subject of responsibility, to clarify the relationship between the administrative organ, the party committee and the people's Congress in administrative decision-making; and to establish the legal system of the procedure of accountability for administrative decision making, The procedure of legalizing administrative decision responsibility and the concrete procedure of administrative decision responsibility investigation must embody fairness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D63

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李江發(fā);鞠成偉;;論黨委決策法制化[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2015年06期

2 姜明安;;改革和完善行政訴訟體制機(jī)制加強(qiáng)人權(quán)司法保障[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

3 劉峰;張國玉;;把決策權(quán)先關(guān)進(jìn)制度的籠子里——如何以決策責(zé)任終身制推動(dòng)政府治理現(xiàn)代化[J];人民論壇·學(xué)術(shù)前沿;2014年12期

4 王仰文;;行政決策責(zé)任追究的制度觀察[J];法治研究;2013年12期

5 趙蕾;張創(chuàng)新;;高官問責(zé)的制度要素分析:系統(tǒng)解構(gòu)與發(fā)展困境[J];中共四川省委省級(jí)機(jī)關(guān)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

6 宋心然;楊小軍;;試論行政問責(zé)制的完善[J];理論與改革;2012年02期

7 李燕青;;行政問責(zé)制面臨的主要問題及其對(duì)策[J];黨政論壇;2012年02期

8 周實(shí);馬野;;行政決策法律責(zé)任追究機(jī)制研究[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

9 周亞越;;論公共危機(jī)管理中的問責(zé)制[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

10 楊小軍;;行政不作為問責(zé)的性質(zhì)與構(gòu)成要件[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1640338